Subacute postoperative atrial fibrillation after heart surgery: Incidence and predictive factors in cardiac rehabilitation.

Background: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is the most common arrhythmia following cardiac surgery (CS). It may occur between the 1st and the 4th postoperative day as acute POAF or between the 5th and the 30th as subacute (sPOAF). sPOAF is associated with higher thromboembolic risk, which consistently increase patients' morbidity. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a low-cost inflammatory index proposed as possible POAF predictor. Identification of patients' risk categories might lead to improved postoperative outcomes. Methods: The aim was to assess the incidence of sPOAF and to identify possible predictors in patients performing cardiovascular rehabilitation (CR) after CS. A single-center cohort study was performed on 737 post-surgical patients admitted to CR on sinus rhythm. Continuous monitoring with 12-lead ECG telemetry was performed. We evaluated the predictive role of anamnestic, clinical, and laboratory data, including baseline NLR. Results: Subacute POAF was documented in 170 cases (23.1%). At the multivariate analysis, age (OR 1.03; p = .001), mitral valve surgery (OR 1.77; p = .012), acute POAF (OR 2.97; p < .001), and NLR at baseline (OR 1.13; p = .042) were found to be independent predictive factors of sPOAF following heart surgery. Conclusions: sPOAF is common after CS. Age, mitral valve procedures, acute POAF, and preoperative NLR were proved to increase sPOAF occurrence in CR. NLR is an affordable and reliable parameter which might be used to qualify the risk of arrhythmias at CR admission. Identification of new predictors of postoperative atrial fibrillation may allow to improve patients' prognosis.

[Management of patients with type 2 diabetes during cardiac prevention and rehabilitation. An expert opinion from the Italian Alliance for Cardiovascular Rehabilitation and Prevention (ITACARE-P)]. / La gestione del paziente con diabete di tipo 2 in Cardiologia Preventiva e Riabilitativa. Expert opinion della Italian Alliance for Cardiovascular Rehabilitation and Prevention (ITACARE-P).

Patients with diabetes, regardless of their cardiovascular disease and their index event, are more and more often referred to Cardiac Rehabilitation Units. These patients usually show high or very high cardiovascular risk, marked disability and poor quality of life. Furthermore, those with older age, frailty, and female sex have even more rehabilitative needs, thus requiring fine individualized approaches. Consequently, in order to identify their therapeutic goals, the glycemic target should be pursued together with the effective reduction of the global cardiovascular risk. Modern exercise protocols are based on the synergic effect of both aerobic and strength training of moderate and high effort intensities, in order to achieve improvements of cardiorespiratory fitness and glycemic values as well. Exercise training and nutritional intervention are strictly related during the rehabilitation program, thus promoting better lifestyle in the long term too. New antidiabetic drugs (such as sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists) should be included into a specific "patient journey" along with other core components of the rehabilitation program. Therefore, the active role of all allied professionals (namely nurses, physiotherapists, dietitians and psychologists) is essential to the success of the cardiometabolic team. Diabetes should be routinely included in the outcome evaluation of cardiac rehabilitation programs and in every follow-up plan through a successful crosstalk among cardiologists, diabetologists and patients.

Imaging of the Diaphragm Following Cardiac Surgery: Focus on Ultrasonographic Assessment.

Diaphragm dysfunction is a common complication following cardiac surgery. Its clinical impact is variable, ranging from the absence of symptoms to the acute respiratory failure. Post-operative diaphragm dysfunction may negatively affect patients' prognosis delaying the weaning from the mechanical ventilation (MV), extending the time of hospitalization and increasing mortality. Ultrasonography is a valid tool to evaluate diaphragmatic impairment in different settings, like the Intensive Care Unit, to predict successful weaning from the MV, and the Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Unit, to stratify patients in terms of risk of functional recovery failure. The aim of this review is to describe the pathophysiology of post-cardiac surgery diaphragm dysfunction, the techniques used for its diagnosis and the potential applications of diaphragm ultrasound.

Diaphragm Dysfunction after Cardiac Surgery: Insights from Ultrasound Imaging during Cardiac Rehabilitation.

Diaphragm dysfunction is common after cardiac surgery and can be evaluated with ultrasonography (US). We aimed at assessing with US the incidence of diaphragmatic dysfunction and the impact of cardiovascular rehabilitation (CR) on its recovery. A single-center cohort study was performed. Patients were enrolled after cardiac surgery. The 6-min walking test (6MWT) and diaphragm US were performed at CR admission and after 10 rehabilitative sessions. One hundred eighty-five patients were eligible for final analysis. One hundred thirty-one patients (70.8%) were found to have diaphragm dysfunction (excursion <2 cm). After CR, 68 patients regained normal diaphragmatic function; those with persistent dysfunction had a lower level of functional performance on the 6MWT (metabolic equivalents of tasks: 3.3 vs. 3.6, p = 0.013). The patients who underwent combined surgery (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 4.09, p = 0.001) and those with post-operative pneumothorax (aOR = 3.02, p = 0.042) were at increased risk of failure to improve diaphragmatic excursion. US parameters were more powerful tools in predicting diaphragmatic evolution compared with the 6MWT indexes: baseline diaphragm excursion and thickening fraction were associated with complete diaphragmatic functional recovery after CR (aOR = 9.101, p < 0.001, and aOR = 1.058, p = 0.020 respectively). US is a valuable tool for the assessment of post-operative diaphragmatic dysfunction and can identify patients at risk of diaphragmatic recovery failure.

Post-pericardiotomy syndrome: insights into neglected postoperative issues.

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: Pericardial effusion is a common complication after cardiac surgery, both isolated and in post-pericardiotomy syndrome (PPS), a condition in which pleuropericardial damage triggers both a local and a systemic inflammatory/immune response. The goal of this review was to present a complete picture of PPS and pericardial complications after cardiac surgery, highlighting available evidence and gaps in knowledge. METHODS: A literature review was performed that included relevant prospective and retrospective studies on the subject. RESULTS: PPS occurs frequently and is associated with elevated morbidity and significantly increased hospital stays and costs. Nevertheless, PPS is often underestimated in clinical practice, and knowledge of its pathogenesis and epidemiology is limited. Several anti-inflammatory drugs have been investigated for treatment but with conflicting evidence. Colchicine demonstrated encouraging results for prevention. CONCLUSIONS: Wider adoption of standardized diagnostic criteria to correctly define PPS and start early treatment is needed. Larger studies are necessary to better identify high-risk patients who might benefit from preventive strategies.

Cardiologist's approach to the diabetic patient: No further delay for a paradigm shift.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is constantly increasing worldwide and its most critical determinant of morbidity and mortality is still represented by cardiovascular (CV) complications. For years, cardiologists' approach to diabetic patients has been focused on risk factors optimization, with positive results. However, the management of DM per se was never truly considered in order to obtain prevention from major CV events, because medications used for glycemic control were not expected to gain CV benefit. Early trials concerning intensive versus conventional glycemia control did not prove useful in reducing the number of CV events. The introduction of new molecules led to a game change in DM treatment, as some new glucose-lowering drugs (GLDs), such as sodium-glucose linked transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA), showed not only to be safe but also to ensure CV benefit. A combination of anti-atherogenic effects and hemodynamic improvements are likely explanations of the observed reduction of CV events and mortality. These evidence opened a completely new era in the field of GLDs and of DM treatment. Nonetheless, the presence of residual cardiovascular risk despite optimal medical therapy remains an issue and an aggressive strategy against multiple risk factors is suggested. A paradigm shift toward a new approach to DM management should be made with no further delay with the use of medications that may prevent CV events in an integrated strategy of CV risk reduction.

Delphi consensus recommendations on how to provide cardiovascular rehabilitation in the COVID-19 era.

This Delphi consensus by 28 experts from the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC) provides initial recommendations on how cardiovascular rehabilitation (CR) facilities should modulate their activities in view of the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A total number of 150 statements were selected and graded by Likert scale [from -5 (strongly disagree) to +5 (strongly agree)], starting from six open-ended questions on (i) referral criteria, (ii) optimal timing and setting, (iii) core components, (iv) structure-based metrics, (v) process-based metrics, and (vi) quality indicators. Consensus was reached on 58 (39%) statements, 48 'for' and 10 'against' respectively, mainly in the field of referral, core components, and structure of CR activities, in a comprehensive way suitable for managing cardiac COVID-19 patients. Panelists oriented consensus towards maintaining usual activities on traditional patient groups referred to CR, without significant downgrading of intervention in case of COVID-19 as a comorbidity. Moreover, it has been suggested to consider COVID-19 patients as a referral group to CR per se when the viral disease is complicated by acute cardiovascular (CV) events; in these patients, the potential development of COVID-related CV sequelae, as well as of pulmonary arterial hypertension, needs to be focused. This framework might be used to orient organization and operational of CR programmes during the COVID-19 crisis.

Cardiac arrest due to acute thrombosis after surgical closure of coronary fistula: the role of anticoagulation.

Described herein the case of a 47-year-old woman who underwent surgical closure of a large fistula between the right coronary artery (RCA) and the superior vena cava with subsequent thrombosis of the ectatic RCA determining myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest. After resuscitation, rheolitic thrombectomy with AngioJet device was performed and anticoagulant treatment was started in addition to antiplatelet therapy. The type of antithrombotic therapy after coronary fistula closure is still debated but long-term anticoagulation should be considered in high-risk cases.

Glycaemic Control and Vascular Complications in Diabetes Mellitus Type 2.

Diabetes mellitus is constantly increasing worldwide. Vascular complications are the most common in the setting of long-standing disease, claiming the greatest burden in terms of morbidity and mortality. Glucotoxicity is involved in vascular damage through different metabolic pathways, such as production of advanced glycation end-products, activation of protein kinase C, polyol pathway activation and production of reactive oxygen species. Vascular complications can be classified according to the calibre of the vessels involved as microvascular (such as diabetic retinopathy, nephropathy and neuropathy) or macrovascular (such as cerebrovascular, coronary and peripheral artery disease). Previous studies showed that the severity of vascular complications depends on duration and degree of hyperglycaemia and, as consequence, early trials were designed to prove that intensive glucose control could reduce the number of vascular events. Unfortunately, results were not as satisfactory as expected. Trials showed good results in reducing incidence of microvascular complications but coronary heart diseases, strokes and peripheral artery diseases were not affected despite optimal glycemia control. In 2008, after the demonstration that rosiglitazone increases cardiovascular risk, FDA demanded stricter rules for marketing glucose-lowering drugs, marking the beginning of cardiovascular outcome trials, whose function is to demonstrate the cardiovascular safety of anti-diabetic drugs. The introduction of new molecules led to a change in diabetes treatment, as some new glucose-lowering drugs showed not only to be safe but also to ensure cardiovascular benefit to diabetic patients. Empaglifozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, was the first molecule to show impressing results, followed on by glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists, such as liraglutide. A combination of anti-atherogenic effects and hemodynamic improvements are likely explanations of the observed reduction in cardiovascular events and mortality. These evidences have opened a completely new era in the field of glucose-lowering drugs and of diabetes treatment in particular with respect to vascular complications.

Liraglutide Reduces Carotid Intima-Media Thickness by Reducing Small Dense Low-Density Lipoproteins in a Real-World Setting of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Novel Anti-Atherogenic Effect.

INTRODUCTION: Liraglutide has several non-glycemic effects, including those on plasma lipids and lipoproteins, contributing to its cardiovascular benefit; however, the exact underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We investigated a novel anti-atherogenic effect of liraglutide in a real-world prospective study on patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). METHODS: Sixty-two patients with T2DM (31 men, 31 women; mean age ± standard deviation 61 ± 9 years) naïve to incretin-based therapies were treated with liraglutide (1.2 mg/day) as add-on therapy to metformin (1500-3000 mg/day) for 4 months. Laboratory analyses included the assessment of lipoprotein subclass profile by gel electrophoresis (Lipoprint; Quantimetrix Corp., Redondo Beach, CA, USA). Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) was assessed by Doppler ultrasonography. Statistical analyses included the paired t test, Spearman correlation and multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: The addition of liraglutide to metformin monotherapy resulted in significant reductions in fasting glycemia, hemoglobin A1c, body mass index, waist circumference, total cholesterol, triglycerides and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, as well as in cIMT. There was an increase in the large LDL-1 subfraction, with a concomitant reduction in atherogenic small dense LDL-3 and LDL-4 subfractions. Correlation analysis revealed a significant association between changes in cIMT and changes in small dense LDL-3 subfraction (r = 0.501; p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis, including all of the measured anthropometric and laboratory parameters, revealed that only changes in the small dense LDL-3 subfraction were independent predictors of changes in cIMT (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Our findings are the first to show that the vascular benefit of liraglutide in patients with T2DM is associated with reductions in atherogenic small dense LDL. This effect is independent of glycemic control and body weight reduction and may represent one of the key mechanisms by which liraglutide is able to reduce cardiovascular events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01715428.

Lung Ultrasound in COVID-19 A Role Beyond the Acute Phase?

OBJECTIVES: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a viral illness caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. With the increasing number of improved and discharged patients with COVID-19, the definition of an adequate follow-up strategy is needed. The purpose of this study was to assess whether lung ultrasound (LUS) is an effective indicator of subclinical residual lung damage in patients with COVID-19 who meet discharge criteria. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 70 consecutive patients with COVID-19 who had a prolonged hospitalization with inpatient rehabilitation between April 6 and May 22, 2020. All of the patients underwent an LUS evaluation at discharge. Data of patients with more severe disease during the acute phase (ie, required ventilatory support) were compared to those of patients with milder disease. RESULTS: Among the 70 patients with COVID-19 (22 women and 48 men; mean age ± SD, 68 ± 13 years), the LUS score before discharge was still frankly pathologic and higher in patients who had more severe disease during the acute phase compared to patients with milder disease (median [interquartile range], 8.0 [5.5-13.5] versus 2.0 [1.0-7.0]; P < .001), even when both categories met internationally defined discharge criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Lung ultrasound can identify the persistence of subclinical residual lung damage in patients with severe COVID-19 even if they meet discharge criteria. Considering the low cost, easy application, and lack of radiation exposure, LUS seems the ideal tool to be adopted in outpatient and primary care settings for the follow-up of patients with COVID-19.

Microvascular dysfunction in infiltrative cardiomyopathies.

Infiltrative heart diseases are characterized by myocardial tissue alterations leading to mechanical dysfunction which in turn develops into bi-ventricular congestive heart failure. Also the coronary microvasculature undergoes significant remodeling and dysfunction. The effects of the unbalance of the mechanical cross-talk between cardiac muscle and vessels and of the impairment of vasodilatory function can be measured non-invasively by means of positron emission tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance.

Cardiologist and Diabetologist crosstalk in the era of cardiovascular outcome trials of novel glucose-lowering drugs.

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes continues to increase and cardiovascular (CV) diseases remain the leading cause of death in diabetic patients. Diabetologists and Cardiologists have to work together in order to provide the best management to these patients. After years of disappointing studies showing no reduction of CV events with strict glycaemic control, some of the novel glucose-lowering drugs (GLDs) seem to offer a new approach to tackle the problem, since the CV outcome trials (CVOTs-D) of liraglutide, semaglutide, empagliflozin and canagliflozin have demonstrated not only their CV safety but also their efficacy in the reduction of CV morbidity and mortality. Along with the initial enthusiasm, concerns have been raised about the economical sustainability of long-term therapies considering higher costs of new molecules relative to the traditional ones. As expenses in the medical field are on the rise, healthcare systems need to balance the positive impact of an intervention and its overall cost. This review is meant to offer the Cardiologists a different point of view on the positive influence of GLDs, in the light of the main trials in the CV fields they are familiar with. The purpose of this article is to critically review the magnitude of the CVOTs-D results by the analysis of their statistical determinants, to establish the extent of the GLDs positive impact on patients with both diabetes and CV disease. The analysis has been performed taking into account models and statistical determinants used in the main landmark cardiology trials. It is fundamental to translate the result of CVOTs-D in clinical practice: the interdisciplinary crosstalk between the Cardiologist and Diabetologist is of paramount importance in order to fully exploit the power of the new available pharmacological strategies.

Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Correlates of Therapeutic Pharmacological Interventions in Essential Arterial Hypertension.

Treating arterial hypertension (HT) remains a hard task. The hypertensive patient is often a subject with several comorbidities and metabolic abnormalities. Clinicians everyday have to choose the right drug for the single patient among the different classes of antihypertensives. Apart from lowering blood pressure, a main therapeutic target should be that of counteracting all the possible pathophysiological mechanisms involved in HT itself and in existing/potential comorbidities. All the ancillary positive and negative effects of the administered drugs should be considered: in particular, since hypertensive patients are often glucose intolerant/diabetic, carrier of serum lipids disorder, have already developed atherosclerotic diseases and endothelial dysfunction, they should not be treated with drugs negatively interfering with these conditions but with molecules that, if possible, improve them. The main pathophysiological mechanisms and correlates of therapeutic pharmacological interventions in essential HT are reviewed here.

Long-Term Preservation of Left Ventricular Systolic Function in Patients With Refractory Angina Pectoris and Inducible Myocardial Ischemia on Optimal Medical Therapy.

Refractory angina pectoris (RAP) represents a clinical condition characterized by frequent episodes of chest pain despite therapy optimization. According to myocardial stunning and myocardial hibernation definitions, RAP should represent the ideal condition for systolic dysfunction development. We aim to investigate the evolution of left ventricular (LV) function in patients with RAP. A retrospective study which encompasses 144 patients with RAP referred to our institution from 1999 to December 2014 was performed. Of them, 88 met the inclusion criteria, and LV function was assessed by echocardiography. All of them had persistent angina episodes on top of optimal medical therapy and evidence of significant inducible myocardial ischemia and no further revascularization options. Nitrates consumption rate, time of angina duration, and the number of angina attacks were evaluated. In the whole population, ejection fraction (EF) was 44% ± 2. EF was significantly lower in patients with previous myocardial infarction (41% ± 1.5 vs 51% ± 1.8, p <0.0001). The duration time and the number of angina attacks did not correlate with EF in the whole population and in patients without previous myocardial infarction. In patients with previous myocardial infarction, the number of anginal attacks did not correlate with EF, but EF appeared higher in patients with angina duration >5 years (<5 years EF 37% ± 1 [n = 26]; >5 years 44% ± 2 [n = 44]; p 0.02). Long-term LV function in patients with RAP is generally preserved. A previous history of myocardial infarction is the only determinant in the development of systolic dysfunction. In conclusion, frequent angina attacks and a long-term history of angina are not apparently associated to worse LV function.