Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMJ Open ; 6(1): e009029, 2016 Jan 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26826145

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess costs associated with implementation of a strict 'search and isolate' strategy for controlling highly drug-resistant organisms (HDRO). DESIGN: Review of data from 2-year prospective surveillance (01/2012 to 12/2013) of HDRO. SETTING: Three university hospitals located in northern Paris. METHODS: Episodes were defined as single cases or outbreaks of glycopeptide-resistant enterococci (GRE) or carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriacae (CPE) colonisation. Costs were related to staff reinforcement, costs of screening cultures, contact precautions and interruption of new admissions. Univariate analysis, along with simple and multiple linear regression analyses, was conducted to determine variables associated with cost of HDRO management. RESULTS: Overall, 41 consecutive episodes were included, 28 single cases and 13 outbreaks. The cost (mean ± SD) associated with management of a single case identified within and/or 48 h after admission was €4443 ± 11,552 and €11,445 ± 15,743, respectively (p<0.01). In an outbreak, the total cost varied from €14,864 ± 17,734 for an episode with one secondary case (€7432 ± 8867 per case) to €136,525 ± 151,231 (€12,845 ± 5129 per case) when more than one secondary case occurred. In episodes of single cases, contact precautions and microbiological analyses represented 51% and 30% of overall cost, respectively. In outbreaks, cost related to interruption of new admissions represented 77-94% of total costs, and had the greatest financial impact (R(2)=0.98, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In HDRO episodes occurring at three university hospitals, interruption of new admissions constituted the most costly measure in an outbreak situation.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/economics , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Drug Resistance , Infection Control/economics , Hospitals, University/economics , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/statistics & numerical data , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/economics , Paris , Prospective Studies
2.
J Infect Dis ; 206(9): 1399-406, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22930806

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Emergence of quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli (QREC) is an increasing clinical challenge mostly originating in fecal microbiota. The dynamics of the emergence of QREC in feces from individuals exposed to ciprofloxacin is unknown. METHODS: A total of 48 healthy volunteers received oral ciprofloxacin for 14 days. Fecal specimens were collected on days 0, 8, 14, and 42. Subpopulations of QREC were detected on selective agar, genetically characterized, and compared with quinolone-susceptible E. coli (QSEC) strains collected on different days. RESULTS: On day 42, 34 subjects carried QSEC, and 14 carried QREC. Of the 14 who carried QREC, 9 carried quinolone-susceptible E. coli on day 0, 1 carried E. coli with a lower level of quinolone resistance on day 0, and 4 carried E. coli with similar levels of resistance and RAPD-genotypes on days 0 and 42. No plasmid acquisition and no selection of resistant mutants from the initial microbiota was evidenced in any case. CONCLUSIONS: In QREC emerging under ciprofloxacin pressure in the fecal microbiota, no proof of selection of quinolone-resistant mutants from the initial microbiota was evidenced, suggesting that QREC strains on day 42 were either present at undetectable levels in the initial microbiota or that exogenous acquisition of QREC strains occurred. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT00190151.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Ciprofloxacin/administration & dosage , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Feces/microbiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Ciprofloxacin/pharmacology , DNA Fingerprinting , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Escherichia coli/classification , Escherichia coli/genetics , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Molecular Typing , Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique , Selection, Genetic
3.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 63(1): 67-71, 2009 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18931389

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Escherichia coli producing CTX-M-15 and CTX-M-14 extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) are spreading worldwide. The aim of this work was to investigate the replicons involved in the emergence and spread of ESBLs in relation to ESBL type. METHODS: A collection of 125 TEM, SHV and CTX-M ESBL-producing E. coli strains was analysed. The replicons carrying the ESBLs and the total plasmid content of the strains have been characterized by PCR replicon typing in relation to the type of ESBL. The ESBL replicons were then compared with the replicon content of E. coli strains carrying TEM-1 or inhibitor-resistant TEM (IRT) beta-lactamases. RESULTS: IncF plasmids were the most frequently carried replicons in our collection, but none carried TEM ESBL. Of TEM ESBLs, 67% were carried on IncA/C replicons except for TEM-52 genes, which were carried preferentially on IncI1 replicons. Although CTX-M enzymes can be carried by various replicons, the great majority of genes encoding CTX-M-14 and CTX-M-15 ESBLs were carried by IncF replicons, as were TEM-1 and IRT beta-lactamases. CONCLUSIONS: Resistance genes borne by the narrow host-range IncF replicon spread readily as this replicon is well adapted to E. coli. This is observed for blaTEM-1 and blaCTX-M-15 and, to a lesser extent, for blaCTX-M-14. Transposition immunity seems to play an important role in the diffusion process.


Subject(s)
DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Escherichia coli/enzymology , Escherichia coli/genetics , Plasmids/classification , Replicon , beta-Lactamases/genetics , DNA Transposable Elements , Humans , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , beta-Lactamases/biosynthesis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...