Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Immunol ; 189(4): 2023-32, 2012 Aug 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22798670

ABSTRACT

Extracellular cyclophilin A (CyPA) and CyPB have been well described as chemotactic factors for various leukocyte subsets, suggesting their contribution to inflammatory responses. Unlike CyPA, CyPB accumulates in extracellular matrixes, from which it is released by inflammatory proteases. Hence, we hypothesized that it could participate in tissue inflammation by regulating the activity of macrophages. In the current study, we confirmed that CyPB initiated in vitro migration of macrophages, but it did not induce production of proinflammatory cytokines. In contrast, pretreatment of macrophages with CyPB attenuated the expression of inflammatory mediators induced by LPS stimulation. The expression of TNF-α mRNA was strongly reduced after exposure to CyPB, but it was not accompanied by significant modification in LPS-induced activation of MAPK and NF-κB pathways. LPS activation of a reporter gene under the control of TNF-α gene promoter was also markedly decreased in cells treated with CyPB, suggesting a transcriptional mechanism of inhibition. Consistent with this hypothesis, we found that CyPB induced the expression of B cell lymphoma-3 (Bcl-3), which was accompanied by a decrease in the binding of NF-κB p65 to the TNF-α promoter. As expected, interfering with the expression of Bcl-3 restored cell responsiveness to LPS, thus confirming that CyPB acted by inhibiting initiation of TNF-α gene transcription. Finally, we found that CyPA was not efficient in attenuating the production of TNF-α from LPS-stimulated macrophages, which seemed to be due to a modest induction of Bcl-3 expression. Collectively, these findings suggest an unexpected role for CyPB in attenuation of the responses of proinflammatory macrophages.


Subject(s)
Cyclophilins/metabolism , Macrophages/metabolism , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/biosynthesis , Signal Transduction/physiology , Transcription Factors/biosynthesis , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/biosynthesis , B-Cell Lymphoma 3 Protein , Blotting, Western , Cells, Cultured , Chemotaxis, Leukocyte/immunology , Chromatin Immunoprecipitation , Cyclophilins/immunology , Flow Cytometry , Gene Expression Regulation/immunology , Humans , Lipopolysaccharides/pharmacology , Macrophages/immunology , RNA, Small Interfering , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/immunology
2.
J Biol Chem ; 285(3): 1701-15, 2010 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19940140

ABSTRACT

Cyclophilin B (CyPB) induces migration and adhesion of T lymphocytes via a mechanism that requires interaction with 3-O-sulfated heparan sulfate (HS). HS biosynthesis is a complex process with many sulfotransferases involved. N-Deacetylases/N-sulfotransferases are responsible for N-sulfation, which is essential for subsequent modification steps, whereas 3-O-sulfotransferases (3-OSTs) catalyze the least abundant modification. These enzymes are represented by several isoforms, which differ in term of distribution pattern, suggesting their involvement in making tissue-specific HS. To elucidate how the specificity of CyPB binding is determined, we explored the relationships between the expression of these sulfotransferases and the generation of HS motifs with CyPB-binding properties. We demonstrated that high N-sulfate density and the presence of 2-O- and 3-O-sulfates determine binding of CyPB, as evidenced by competitive experiments with heparin derivatives, soluble HS, and anti-HS antibodies. We then showed that target cells, i.e. CD4+ lymphocyte subsets, monocytes/macrophages, and related cell lines, specifically expressed high levels of NDST2 and 3-OST3 isoforms. Silencing the expression of NDST1, NDST2, 2-OST, and 3-OST3 by RNA interference efficiently decreased binding and activity of CyPB, thus confirming their involvement in the biosynthesis of binding sequences for CyPB. Moreover, we demonstrated that NDST1 was able to partially sulfate exogenous substrate in the absence of NDST2 but not vice versa, suggesting that both isoenzymes do not have redundant activities but do have rather complementary activities in making N-sulfated sequences with CyPB-binding properties. Altogether, these results suggest a regulatory mechanism in which cell type-specific expression of certain HS sulfotransferases determines the specific binding of CyPB to target cells.


Subject(s)
Cyclophilins/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Enzymologic , Heparitin Sulfate/biosynthesis , Heparitin Sulfate/metabolism , Sulfotransferases/genetics , Animals , Cattle , Cell Line, Tumor , Down-Regulation , Heparin/metabolism , Heparitin Sulfate/chemistry , Humans , Isoenzymes/deficiency , Isoenzymes/genetics , Isoenzymes/metabolism , Macrophages/metabolism , Monocytes/metabolism , Nitrogen/metabolism , Organ Specificity , Protein Binding , RNA Interference , Substrate Specificity , Sulfates/metabolism , Sulfotransferases/deficiency , Sulfotransferases/metabolism , T-Lymphocytes/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...