Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(16): e37819, 2024 Apr 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38640317

ABSTRACT

Patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy may have different cancer symptom clusters (CSC) that negatively impact their quality of life (QoL). These symptoms can sometimes arise from the disease itself or as a result of their cancer treatment. This study aimed to: examine the feasibility of longitudinal testing of CSC pattern and QoL in a sample of adult cancer patients undergoing outpatient chemotherapy; to identify the cardiovascular risk of patients with cancer undergoing outpatient chemotherapy; and to investigate the most prevalent CSC and their impact on the QoL of these patients. A longitudinal pilot study was conducted with eleven participants with a mean age of 56.09 years (range: 27-79) diagnosed with malignant neoplasm and undergoing outpatient chemotherapy treatment were evaluated during 6 cycles of chemotherapy. The CSC, cardiovascular risk, and QoL were assessed using the MSAS, FRS, and EQ-5D-3L™, respectively. Descriptive statistical and non-parametric bivariate analyses were performed. Patients who started chemotherapy treatment generally had a low to moderate cardiovascular risk and were likely to have a family history of hypertension, acute myocardial infarction, and stroke. Cardiovascular risk was found to be correlated with patient age (Rhos = 0.64; P = .033). In addition, the results showed a reduction in the QoL scoring over the 6 chemotherapy sessions. Regarding the most prevalent CSC, 2 clusters were identified: the neuropsychological symptom cluster (difficulty concentrating-sadness-worry) and the fatigue-difficulty sleeping cluster. Between the first and sixth chemotherapy sessions, there was a decrease in the perception of "mild" severity (P = .004) and an increase in the perception of "severe" and "very severe" (P = .003) for all symptoms. Adequate attention to CSC should be the basis for the accurate planning of effective interventions to manage the symptoms experienced by cancer patients.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Cardiovascular Diseases , Neoplasms , Adult , Humans , Middle Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Quality of Life/psychology , Syndrome , Pilot Projects , Cardiovascular Diseases/chemically induced , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Heart Disease Risk Factors
2.
Nutrition ; 123: 112411, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38518541

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the nutritional status of women with stage I to III breast cancer in the first and third cycles of outpatient chemotherapy and to identify factors associated with it. METHODS: The prospective longitudinal study was conducted at a Reference Hospital for Cancer Care in Brazil and included women aged ≥18 y diagnosed with stage I to III breast cancer receiving outpatient chemotherapy. Assessments were performed during the 1st and 3rd cycles of chemotherapy, including anthropometric measurements, sociodemographic data, clinical information, and quality of life. Nutritional risk was assessed using the NRS-2002. RESULTS: Overweight was predominant in both chemotherapy cycles. Approximately 6.67% and 10% of patients were at nutritional risk in the 1st and 3rd chemotherapy cycles, respectively. Anxiety/depression was prevalent in the 1st chemotherapy cycle and was significantly associated with nutritional risk (P = 0.002). The variables age in cycle 3 and pain/discomfort in cycle 1 (P = 0.049 and P = 0.043, respectively) showed a significant association with nutritional risk. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the complex interaction between nutritional status, neuropsychological symptoms, and sociodemographic characteristics in breast cancer patients during chemotherapy, and underscores the need for personalized interventions to improve oncological care.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Nutritional Status , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Brazil , Longitudinal Studies , Adult , Outpatients/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Life , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Depression , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Ambulatory Care/methods , Anxiety , Nutrition Assessment , Overweight
3.
Nutrients ; 15(23)2023 Nov 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38068818

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer poses a significant public health concern owing to its high prevalence and the risk of mortality associated with delayed diagnosis and treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the nutritional status of women with non-metastatic breast cancer and to identify factors associated with it. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted at a High Complexity Oncology Assistance Center in the southeast region of Brazil, with the aim of assessing the nutritional status in women undergoing treatment for stage I, II, or III breast cancer. Patients in palliative care or undergoing reconstructive surgery were excluded. Data collection took place between June 2022 and March 2023 and included questionnaires, physical examinations, laboratory tests, and anthropometric assessments. Nutritional status was assessed using measures such as BMI and skinfold thickness, while nutritional risk was assessed using the Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002) tool. RESULTS: Significant associations were found between nutritional risk and educational level (p = 0.03) and BMI (p = 0.01). Binary logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association between educational level and nutritional risk, indicating that lower educational level was associated with higher odds of nutritional risk (OR = 4.59; 95% CI = 1.01-21.04; p = 0.049). In addition, regarding BMI, it was observed that a BMI above 20.5 kg/m2 was associated with a higher likelihood of nutritional risk (OR = 0.09; 95% CI = 0.01-0.89; p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: It is crucial to consider the nutritional status of breast cancer patients, alongside clinical factors, to offer comprehensive and personalized care. Gaining insight into the sociodemographic variables linked to nutritional risk can significantly contribute to our understanding of breast cancer. This knowledge, in turn, can aid in identifying effective strategies for public policy, health promotion, and prevention efforts aimed at tackling this condition.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Nutritional Status , Humans , Female , Brazil/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...