Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Trauma ; 25(3): 228-31, 1985 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3981675

ABSTRACT

A retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate peritoneal lavage in detecting abdominal penetration. Two hundred thirty-five patients with thoracoabdominal, flank, or tangential abdominal gunshot wounds were lavaged. Of these patients, 44 (18.7%) had positive lavages, defined as red blood cell counts greater than 10,000 cells/mm3, white blood cell counts greater than 500 cells/mm3, or the presence of bile, feces, or vegetable matter. There were 13.6% false positives and 1.0% false negatives, with an overall accuracy of 96.6%. The results were unaffected by mechanism or site of injury. If the criteria were changed to include red blood cell counts greater than 100,000 cells/mm3, there would have been no false positives, but an unacceptably high 11.1% false negative rate. Therefore we conclude that peritoneal lavage can be a reliable indicator of abdominal penetration provided sufficiently sensitive criteria are used. These criteria should include red blood cell counts greater than 10,000 cells/mm3 instead of 100,000 cells/mm3.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Injuries/diagnosis , Peritoneal Cavity , Therapeutic Irrigation , Wounds, Penetrating/diagnosis , Abdominal Injuries/surgery , Adult , Erythrocyte Count , False Negative Reactions , False Positive Reactions , Hemoperitoneum/diagnosis , Humans , Laparotomy , Leukocyte Count , Male , Wounds, Penetrating/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...