Pharmacological hyperprolactinemia: a retrospective analysis of 501 hyperprolactinemia cases in primary care setting.

PURPOSE: To describe a series of cases with pharmacological hyperprolactinemia in primary care setting and the prolactin levels, clinical implications of different causes of pharmacological hyperprolactinemia. METHODS: A retrospective study of all patients with detected hyperprolactinemia in hormonal studies was performed between 2019 and 2020 in 20 Spanish primary care centers. Hyperprolactinemia is defined as a serum prolactin >19.4ng/ml in men and >26.5ng/ml in women. Four pharmacological causes of hyperprolactinemia were established: (i) oral contraceptives (OCPs) and other hormonal treatments; (ii) antipsychotics and antidepressants; (iii) other drugs (calcium antagonists, antiemetics, H2 antihistamines, opioids, and anabolic agents); and (iv) hyperprolactinemia due to several drugs. RESULTS: From a sample of 501 patients with elevated serum prolactin, 39.4% (n=162) had pharmacological hyperprolactinemia. The most common cause of pharmacological hyperprolactinemia in women was OCPs (n=61) while in men antipsychotics/antidepressants (n=21). In the cases of hyperprolactinemia due to antipsychotics/antidepressants, the prolactin levels were significantly higher in patients taking classical antipsychotics than in those taking second-generation antipsychotics (80.0±43.17 vs. 50.7±28.66 ng/dL, P=0.035). The antidepressant/antipsychotic group showed hyperprolactinemia-related symptoms more frequently than the group of other treatments (58.9% vs. 32%, P=0.001). The concomitant use of several drugs caused hyperprolactinemia-related symptoms more frequently than one drug alone (73% vs. 44%, P=0.031). CONCLUSION: In this series of cases, drugs represented the 39.4% of the causes of hyperprolactinemia. The most common drugs were OCPs in women and antipsychotics/antidepressants in men. Antidepressants/antipsychotics were drugs that caused the greatest elevation of the prolactin levels and showed hyperprolactinemia-related symptoms more frequently.

Causes of hyperprolactinaemia in the primary care setting: How to optimise hyperprolactinaemia management.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To analyse the causes of hyperprolactinaemia in patients with symptoms compatible with hyperprolactinaemia evaluated in a primary care setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of all patients tested for serum prolactin levels between 2019 and 2020 in 20 primary care centres at the Hospital Ramón y Cajal in Madrid. Hyperprolactinaemia is defined as a serum prolactin>19.4ng/ml in men and >26.5ng/ml in women. Aetiology is grouped into physiological (pregnancy, lactation, inadequate venipuncture, macroprolactinaemia), pharmacological, pathological (hypothalamic and/or pituitary diseases, chronic renal failure, primary hypothyroidism), and idiopathic. RESULTS: In 1630 patients tested for serum prolactin, 30.7% (n=501) had hyperprolactinaemia. Of these 501 patients, 89.6% were females. 149 patients were referred to the Endocrinology Department and 164 to the Gynaecology Department. Aetiological diagnosis of hyperprolactinaemia was achieved in 411 out of 501 cases. The most frequent cause of hyperprolactinaemia was pharmacological, in 39.1%. The second more frequent cause was idiopathic (29%) and less common were inadequate venipuncture extraction (13.4%), tumour (8.5%) and macroprolactinaemia (3.9%). Patients with tumoural hyperprolactinaemia presented higher serum prolactin levels (87.0±80.19 vs 49.7±39.62ng/ml, P=0.010). In addition, symptoms, such as galactorrhoea (33.3% vs 16.5%, P=0.018), and headache (25.7% vs 13.3%, P=0.045), were more frequent than in patients of the other aetiological groups. CONCLUSION: Hyperprolactinaemia is common among patients evaluated in a primary care setting with symptoms of hyperprolactinaemia, but more than 50% of cases are due to pharmacological treatments or improper sample extraction. It is necessary to establish referral protocols to specialised medicine to optimise healthcare resources and avoid unnecessary studies.

Presurgical predictive factors of surgical remission in Cushing's disease. Study of 32 cases.

PURPOSE: Identify presurgical factors associated with surgical remission in Cushing's disease (CD). METHODS: All the patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing's Syndrome in follow-up at our centre between 2014-2021 (n=40) were identified. Those patients with CD diagnosis who underwent transsphenoidal surgery by the same neurosurgeon (n=32) were included. Surgical remission was defined as plasma cortisol <1.8µg/dl and normal or low urinary free cortisol (UFC) after surgery. RESULTS: Sixty-three per cent (n=20) were women, and the mean age at diagnosis was 42.3±17.9 years. Six patients had macroadenomas, 17 had microadenomas, and in the other 9 patients, no pituitary lesion was identified on the MRI. Seven patients were previously operated on in another centre. Surgical remission was achieved in 75% (n=24). Only three patients experienced recurrence. No association between pre-surgical demographic (age, sex, comorbidities) or hormonal (UFC, ACTH, late-night salivary cortisol levels) characteristics and the probability of surgical remission was observed. The only variable associated with a greater chance of remission was the presurgical visualisation of the adenoma on MRI (OR 8.3, P=0.02). It was also observed that patients with a history of a previous pituitary surgery had a lower tendency to achieve remission, although statistical significance was not reached (OR 0.17, P=0.09). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, 75% of patients with CD achieved biochemical cure after the intervention. Surgical remission was up to eight times more frequent in those patients in whom the adenoma was visualised before the intervention, but no other presurgical predictive factors of cure were identified.

Presurgical predictive factors of surgical remission in Cushing's disease. Study of 32 cases.

PURPOSE: Identify presurgical factors associated with surgical remission in Cushing's disease (CD). METHODS: All the patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing's Syndrome in follow-up at our centre between 2014-2021 (n=40) were identified. Those patients with CD diagnosis who underwent transsphenoidal surgery by the same neurosurgeon (n=32) were included. Surgical remission was defined as plasma cortisol <1.8µg/dl and normal or low urinary free cortisol (UFC) after surgery. RESULTS: Sixty-three per cent (n=20) were women, and the mean age at diagnosis was 42.3±17.9 years. Six patients had macroadenomas, 17 had microadenomas, and in the other 9 patients, no pituitary lesion was identified on the MRI. Seven patients were previously operated on in another centre. Surgical remission was achieved in 75% (n=24). Only three patients experienced recurrence. No association between pre-surgical demographic (age, sex, comorbidities) or hormonal (UFC, ACTH, late-night salivary cortisol levels) characteristics and the probability of surgical remission was observed. The only variable associated with a greater chance of remission was the presurgical visualisation of the adenoma on MRI (OR 8.3, P=0.02). It was also observed that patients with a history of a previous pituitary surgery had a lower tendency to achieve remission, although statistical significance was not reached (OR 0.17, P=0.09). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, 75% of patients with CD achieved biochemical cure after the intervention. Surgical remission was up to eight times more frequent in those patients in whom the adenoma was visualised before the intervention, but no other presurgical predictive factors of cure were identified.