ABSTRACT
OBJECT: To assess the feasibility of measuring diffusion and perfusion fraction in vertebral bone marrow using the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) approach and to compare two fitting methods, i.e., the non-negative least squares (NNLS) algorithm and the more commonly used Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) non-linear least squares algorithm, for the analysis of IVIM data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRI experiments were performed on fifteen healthy volunteers, with a diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequence at five different b-values (0, 50, 100, 200, 600 s/mm2), in combination with an STIR module to suppress the lipid signal. Diffusion signal decays in the first lumbar vertebra (L1) were fitted to a bi-exponential function using the LM algorithm and further analyzed with the NNLS algorithm to calculate the values of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*) and perfusion fraction. RESULTS: The NNLS analysis revealed two diffusion components only in seven out of fifteen volunteers, with ADC=0.60±0.09 (10(-3) mm(2)/s), D*=28±9 (10(-3) mm2/s) and perfusion fraction=14%±6%. The values obtained by the LM bi-exponential fit were: ADC=0.45±0.27 (10(-3) mm2/s), D*=63±145 (10(-3) mm2/s) and perfusion fraction=27%±17%. Furthermore, the LM algorithm yielded values of perfusion fraction in cases where the decay was not bi-exponential, as assessed by NNLS analysis. CONCLUSION: The IVIM approach allows for measuring diffusion and perfusion fraction in vertebral bone marrow; its reliability can be improved by using the NNLS, which identifies the diffusion decays that display a bi-exponential behavior.
Subject(s)
Bone Marrow/anatomy & histology , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Algorithms , Echo-Planar Imaging/methods , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Least-Squares Analysis , Male , Reproducibility of Results , Spine , Young AdultABSTRACT
Snapping phenomena result from the sudden impingement between anatomical and/or heterotopical structures with subsequent abrupt movement and noise. Snaps are variously perceived by patients, from mild discomfort to significant pain requiring surgical management. Identifying the precise cause of snaps may be challenging when no abnormality is encountered on routinely performed static examinations. In this regard, dynamic imaging techniques have been developed over time, with various degrees of success. This review encompasses the main features of each imaging technique and proposes an overview of the main snapping phenomena in the musculoskeletal system.
