Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36078860

ABSTRACT

Sharp injuries, determining the risk of bloodborne infections and psychological distress in healthcare workers, may be prevented by a set of strategies, legally enforced in Europe through the Directive 2010/32/EU. To assess its level of implementation in Italy, a national survey was conducted in 2017 and again in 2021, evaluating the progress and possible drawbacks of the COVID-19 pandemic. Altogether, 285 safety managers and 330 nurses from a representative sample of 97 and 117 public hospitals were interviewed using a standardized questionnaire. Knowledge of the Directive requirements decreased significantly, with <60% of participants answering correctly in 2021, and nurses' attendance in specific courses dropped to 25% in 2021 compared to 54% in 2017. Over 75% of hospitals introduced multiple safety-engineered devices (SED), though total replacement occurred in <50% of cases; routine SED availability increased for blood collection (89%) and venous access devices (83%). Incorrect behaviors in handling sharps decreased significantly over time. Nurses' HBV vaccination coverage was high (89% in both surveys); in the last year, 97% were vaccinated against COVID, and 47% against influenza. Average annual injuries per hospital did not increase significantly (32 in 2021 vs. 26 in 2017). In 2017, nurses' perceived safety barriers were working in emergency situations (49%) and lack of resources (40%); in 2021, understaffing (73%), physical fatigue (62%), and handling difficulties while wearing full protective equipment (59%). Safety measures were implemented in Italian hospitals, and although the average injuries per hospital did not show a decrease, these measures could have helped protect healthcare workers during the pandemic, mitigating its potential impact on the increase in situations at risk of injury.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Needlestick Injuries , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Health Personnel , Hospitals, Public , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Needlestick Injuries/epidemiology , Pandemics/prevention & control
2.
J Water Health ; 11(4): 738-47, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24334848

ABSTRACT

Legionella colonization in hospital hot water distribution networks was evaluated following 36 months of continuous treatment with monochloramine and compared with chlorine dioxide. Nitrite, nitrate, chlorite, chlorate, bromide, trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids as well as the biocide concentration at sampled points were measured. Only 8/84 samples treated with monochloramine were found contaminated and after the first 8 months of treatment no Legionella was isolated. Chlorine dioxide was associated with a strong reduction in Legionella contamination compared to pre-treatment, but differences according to the device were observed. Monochloramine between 2 and 3 mg l(-1) and chlorine dioxide between 0.50 and 0.70 mg l(-1) were needed to control Legionella colonization. Comparing no- and post-flush samples, a higher frequency of no-flush positive samples was noted using chlorine dioxide, suggesting an increased risk for patients when they open the tap. No increase in chlorite levels and no water nitrification occurred by using monochloramine. Chlorite at levels exceeding the limit requested for drinking water was measured when chlorine dioxide was applied. In conclusion, we highlight that continuous injection of monochloramine should be considered as an effective alternative to chlorine dioxide in controlling legionellae contamination inside hospital water distribution systems.


Subject(s)
Chloramines/pharmacology , Chlorine Compounds/pharmacology , Disinfection/methods , Hospitals , Legionella pneumophila/drug effects , Oxides/pharmacology , Water Microbiology , Disinfectants/pharmacology , Time Factors , Water Purification/methods
3.
New Microbiol ; 36(4): 373-83, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24177299

ABSTRACT

We investigated two consecutive Serratia marcescens (S. marcescens) outbreaks which occurred in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of a tertiary level hospital in North Italy in a period of 10 years (January 2003-December 2012). Risk factors associated with S. marcescens acquisition were evaluated by a retrospective case-control study. A total of 21,011 clinical samples was examined: S. marcescens occurred in 127 neonates: 43 developed infection and 3 died. Seven clusters were recorded due to 12 unrelated clones which persisted for years in the ward, although no environmental source was found. The main epidemic clone A sustaining the first cluster in 2003 reappeared in 2010 as an extended spectrum ?-lactamase (ESBL)-producing strain and supporting the second epidemic. Birth weight, gestational age, use of invasive devices and length of stay in the ward were significantly related to S. marcescens acquisition. The opening of a new ward for non-intensive care-requiring neonates, strict adherence to alcoholic hand disinfection, the timely identification and isolation of infected and colonized neonates assisted in containing the epidemics. Genotyping was effective in tracing the evolution and dynamics of the clones demonstrating their long-term persistence in the ward.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/epidemiology , Serratia Infections/epidemiology , Serratia marcescens/isolation & purification , Case-Control Studies , Cross Infection/microbiology , Disease Outbreaks , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Italy , Male , Retrospective Studies , Serratia Infections/microbiology , Serratia marcescens/genetics
4.
Case Rep Med ; 2013: 303712, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23476661

ABSTRACT

We report a case of Legionella pneumonia in a 78-year-old patient affected by cerebellar haemangioblastoma continuously hospitalised for 24 days prior to the onset of overt symptoms. According to the established case definition, this woman should have been definitely classified as a nosocomial case (patient spending all of the ten days in hospital before onset of symptoms). Water samples from the oncology ward were negative, notably the patient's room and the oxygen bubbler, and the revision of the case history induced us to verify possible contamination in water samples collected at home. We found that the clinical strain had identical rep-PCR fingerprint of L. pneumophila serogroup 1 isolated at home. The description of this culture-proven case of Legionnaires' disease has major clinical, legal, and public health consequences as the complexity of hospitalised patients poses limitations to the rule-of-thumb surveillance definition of nosocomial pneumonia based on 2-10-day incubation period.

6.
Am J Infect Control ; 40(3): 279-81, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21741121

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We report the results of 1-year application of monochloramine to control Legionella pneumophila contamination in a hospital hot water distribution system. METHODS: In the main building of the hospital, a device continuously distributing monochloramine was installed. Legionella pneumophila and Pseudomonas spp contamination was followed in comparison with 2 other water networks in the same building using chlorine dioxide. RESULTS: Monochloramine significantly reduced the number of contaminated sites compared with baseline (from 97.0% to 13.3%, respectively), chlorine dioxide device I (from 100% to 56.7%, respectively), and device II (from 100% to 60.8%, respectively). No positive sample exceeded 10(4) colony-forming units/L versus 59.4% at baseline. CONCLUSION: Monochloramine could represent a good alternative to chlorine dioxide in controlling legionellae contamination in public and private buildings.


Subject(s)
Chloramines/pharmacology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Disinfectants/pharmacology , Disinfection/methods , Legionella pneumophila/drug effects , Legionnaires' Disease/prevention & control , Water Microbiology , Chlorine Compounds/pharmacology , Colony Count, Microbial , Hospitals , Humans , Legionella pneumophila/isolation & purification , Oxides/pharmacology , Pseudomonas/drug effects , Pseudomonas/isolation & purification , Pseudomonas Infections/prevention & control
7.
G Ital Med Lav Ergon ; 32(3): 235-9, 2010.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21061701

ABSTRACT

Healthcare workers (HCW) are exposed to many different pathogens, and cases of occupational infection have been reported involving the vast majority of known and emerging agents. The risk is present during all the phases of patient care and manipulation of biologic materials, and the implementation of Standard Precautions--and biosafety level 2 measures in the laboratory--and Transmission-Based Precautions in all health settings represents the necessary preventive intervention required by law. Percutaneous exposures represent an extremely frequent event in healthcare facilities; among the many pathogens acquired through this type of exposure, those of highest concern due to the frequency of exposure are HIV, HBV and HCV. Over the last 10 years, though the risk of exposure is still not negligible, occupational infection with HBV has become a rare event; conversely, the incidence of acute C hepatitis became significantly higher among HCW (1,6 per 100.000 inhabitants) with respect to the general population (0,6), with a seroconversion rate following an occupational exposure between 0,5% and 1,8%; finally, reports of occupational HIV infection have decreased, probably also as a secondary beneficial effect of antiretroviral treatment in patients and post-exposure prophylaxis in HCW. The Studio Italiano Rischio Occupazionale da HIV (SIROH) documented from 1986 to 2009 one occupational HBV case, 6 HIV cases (the last one in 2007) and 32 HCV cases. In Europe, the Directive 2010/32/EU approved on May 10 2010 requires Member State to implement within three years a global strategy to prevent occupational exposures in the healthcare setting, particularly with respect to needlestick and sharp injuries, including the adoption, based on risk assessment, of devices incorporating safety features. In Italy the introduction of these devices, according to data collected by the SIROH, showed the possibility to decrease percutaneous exposures by 75%, an effect sustained over time if supported by information, education and training.


Subject(s)
Blood-Borne Pathogens , Communicable Diseases/epidemiology , Health Personnel , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/microbiology , Communicable Disease Control , Humans , Needlestick Injuries/complications , Needlestick Injuries/epidemiology , Needlestick Injuries/prevention & control , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control
8.
Crit Care ; 13(5): R143, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19728879

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The application in clinical practice of evidence-based guidelines for the management of patients with severe sepsis/septic shock is still poor in the emergency department, while little data are available for patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of an in-hospital sepsis program on the adherence to evidence-based guidelines and outcome of patients with severe sepsis/septic shock admitted to the ICU. METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study included 67 patients with severe sepsis/septic shock admitted to a multidisciplinary ICU at a University Hospital from January 2005 to June 2007. Compliance to 5 resuscitation and 4 management sepsis interventions and in-hospital mortality were measured following an educational program on sepsis for physician and nurses of all hospital departments and hospital implementation of a specific protocol for recognition and management of patients with severe sepsis/septic shock, including an early consultation by a skilled 'sepsis team'. RESULTS: During the study period, the compliance to all 9 interventions increased from 8% to 35% of the patients (P < 0.01). The implementation of resuscitation and management interventions was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality (23% vs 68% and 27% vs 68%, P < 0.01). In the latter 2 semesters, after activation of the 'sepsis team', in-hospital mortality of ICU septic shock patients decreased by about 40% compared with the previous period (32% vs 79%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, an in-hospital sepsis program, including education of health-care personnel and process-changes, improved the adherence to guidelines and the survival rate of patients with severe sepsis/septic shock admitted to the ICU.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units , Sepsis/drug therapy , Severity of Illness Index , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Guideline Adherence , Hospital Mortality , Hospitals, University , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Observation , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Sepsis/physiopathology , Survival , Treatment Outcome
9.
Scand J Infect Dis ; 38(8): 725-8, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16857627

ABSTRACT

We report a case of Legionella pneumonia in a patient with psoriasis. The clinical strain had an identical PFGE pattern of 1 subtype of L. pneumophila serogroup 1 isolated at low concentration in a sporting club bath. Diagnostic, clinical and epidemiological aspects are discussed for their relevant public health implications.


Subject(s)
Legionella pneumophila/isolation & purification , Legionnaires' Disease/microbiology , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/methods , Humans , Legionnaires' Disease/epidemiology , Lung/microbiology , Male , Middle Aged , Public Health
10.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 172(5): 631-5, 2005 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15961696

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Interferon (IFN)-gamma blood tests may improve the current level of diagnostic accuracy for tuberculosis infection. The QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT-Gold) has been used in selected populations and shows higher specificity than the tuberculin skin test (TST). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the QFT-Gold test in unselected patients and assess the level of agreement with the TST. METHODS: The test has been routinely performed on whole blood samples in our microbiology laboratory for 8 months. Demographic, clinical, and microbiological data have been collected and correlated to the QFT-Gold results. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 318 patients tested, 68 (21.4%) gave an indeterminate (low positive mitogen control) QFT-Gold result. Indeterminate results were significantly overrepresented in patients with a negative TST (28.9% vs. 6.6% in TST-positive patients; p < 0.0001, chi2 test) and were more frequent in patients receiving immunosuppressive therapies than in those who were not receiving such treatments (odds ratio, 3.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.84-6.08; p < 0.0001). After excluding indeterminate results, the concordance between QFT-Gold and TST was significantly lower in Bacille Calmette-Guérin-vaccinated individuals (41.5%) than in nonvaccinated individuals (80.3%) (p < 0.0001). In 11 patients with active tuberculosis (5 culture-confirmed), QFT-Gold provided more positive results than the TST (66.7% vs. 33.3%; p = 0.165). CONCLUSIONS: The QFT-Gold test is feasible in routine hospital use for the diagnosis of tuberculosis infection. As with the TST, immunosuppression may negatively affect the test's performance, with a significant rate of indeterminate results in the most vulnerable population.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Tests, Routine/methods , Interferon-gamma/blood , Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Immunoassay/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Skin Tests
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...