Comparison of procedural outcomes between morning and afternoon colonoscopies performed by colorectal surgeons.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Colonoscopy is a common procedure performed by colorectal surgeons for screening, diagnosis, and surveillance of various colorectal diseases. Existing literature has conflicting data on quality outcomes of colonoscopies performed in the afternoon and the morning schedules and only includes colonoscopies performed by gastroenterologists. We sought to analyze procedural outcomes between morning and afternoon colonoscopies performed by colorectal surgeons. DATA SOURCES AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A retrospective chart review of colonoscopies performed by colorectal surgeons at a tertiary care center from October 2018 through July 2020 was performed. Complete colonoscopies with documented times were included. Patients with colonic resection and incomplete colonoscopy were excluded. Main outcome measures adenoma and polyp detection rates and colonoscopy time variables were compared between morning and afternoon colonoscopies. RESULTS: A total of 781 patients were analyzed. Colonoscopies were evenly distributed during shifts (49% morning and 51% afternoon). The overall polyp and adenoma detection rates were 46% and 29%, respectively. There were no significant differences in adenoma and polyp detection rates and colonoscopy duration between morning and afternoon colonoscopies. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that history of prior polypectomy was an independent predictor of adenoma detection rate (OR: 2.17, 95% CI 1.33-3.54, p = 0.002) and was associated with significantly increased colonoscopy times in afternoon shift. CONCLUSION: There were no differences in quality outcomes of adenoma and polyp detection rates between morning and afternoon colonoscopies performed by colorectal surgeons. In addition to known predictors, cecal intubation time and history of polypectomy were also independent predictors of adenoma detection rate. Patients with prior polypectomy had increased colonoscopy times in afternoon shift. Since colorectal surgeons perform higher proportion of diagnostic and surveillance colonoscopies, these patients may be better suited for colonoscopies in morning shift.

Differential abundance of CK1α provides selectivity for pharmacological CK1α activators to target WNT-dependent tumors.

Constitutive WNT activity drives the growth of various human tumors, including nearly all colorectal cancers (CRCs). Despite this prominence in cancer, no WNT inhibitor is currently approved for use in the clinic largely due to the small number of druggable signaling components in the WNT pathway and the substantial toxicity to normal gastrointestinal tissue. We have shown that pyrvinium, which activates casein kinase 1α (CK1α), is a potent inhibitor of WNT signaling. However, its poor bioavailability limited the ability to test this first-in-class WNT inhibitor in vivo. We characterized a novel small-molecule CK1α activator called SSTC3, which has better pharmacokinetic properties than pyrvinium, and found that it inhibited the growth of CRC xenografts in mice. SSTC3 also attenuated the growth of a patient-derived metastatic CRC xenograft, for which few therapies exist. SSTC3 exhibited minimal gastrointestinal toxicity compared to other classes of WNT inhibitors. Consistent with this observation, we showed that the abundance of the SSTC3 target, CK1α, was decreased in WNT-driven tumors relative to normal gastrointestinal tissue, and knocking down CK1α increased cellular sensitivity to SSTC3. Thus, we propose that distinct CK1α abundance provides an enhanced therapeutic index for pharmacological CK1α activators to target WNT-driven tumors.

Retention cuff pressure study of 3 indwelling stool management systems: randomized study of 10 healthy subjects.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare retention cuff pressures of 3 indwelling stool management systems while subjects assumed different body positions and while cuffs were inflated to different volumes. METHODS: Retention cuff pressure study of 3 indwelling stool management systems was a randomized, crossover, open-label pilot study of 10 healthy adult volunteers in 3 body positions (supine, right side, and left side), 3 head-of-bed elevations (20°, 30°, and 40°), and 3 cuff overfill volumes (5, 10, and 15 mL). The devices were DigniCare Stool Management System (device A; Bard Medical Division, C. R. Bard, Inc, Covington, Georgia), Flexi-Seal Fecal Management System (device B; ConvaTec, a division of E. R. Squibb & Sons, LLC, Princeton, New Jersey), and ActiFlo Indwelling Bowel Catheter System (device C; Hollister, Inc, Libertyville, Illinois). We assessed cuff pressure by manometry and rectal mucosa by digital examination and small-diameter, flexible endoscopy. RESULTS: Cuffs were appropriately seated in the rectal vault for all 3 devices in all body positions and overfill volumes. Rectal mucosal abnormalities were observed in 4 of 10 subjects (40%) after removal of device A, 1 of 5 (20%) after removal of device B, and 3 of 5 (60%) after removal of device C. Retention cuff pressure was at least 2-fold lower for device A than for device B or C in all body positions, head-of-bed elevations, and device overfill volumes. For example, mean pressure while subjects were on their left sides was 25.0 mm Hg for device A, 79.2 mm Hg for device B, and 67.2 mm Hg for device C. Corresponding pressures at 15 mL of overfill were 52.5, 102.0, and 94.0 mm Hg. Subject comfort scores were comparable for all 3 devices. CONCLUSION: All devices appeared to seat well within the rectal vault, but device A was associated with cuff pressure measurements that were consistently lower than those of devices B and C. More studies are needed to elucidate the clinical relevance of these findings and whether they translate to differences in patient safety or comfort.

Does delay of adjuvant chemotherapy impact survival in patients with resected stage II and III colon adenocarcinoma?

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether delays in commencing adjuvant chemotherapy after surgical resection of colon adenocarcinoma adversely impact survival. METHODS: Patients with stage II-III colon adenocarcinoma who received adjuvant chemotherapy at 2 centers were identified through the institutional tumor registry. Time to adjuvant chemotherapy, overall survival (OS), and relapse-free survival (RFS) were calculated from the day of surgery. Patients were dichotomized into early (time to adjuvant chemotherapy ≤ 60 days) and late treatment (time to adjuvant chemotherapy >60 days) groups. OS and RFS were compared using log-rank test and multivariate analysis by the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Of 186 patients included in the study, 49 (26%) had received adjuvant chemotherapy >60 days after surgical resection. Thirty percent of the delays were system related (eg, late referrals, insurance authorizations). Time to adjuvant chemotherapy >60 days was associated with significantly worse OS in both univariate analysis and a Cox proportional hazards model (hazard ratio, 2.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-4.36). Although difference in RFS between the 2 groups favored time to adjuvant chemotherapy <60, this did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy delay >60 days after surgical resection of colon cancer is associated with worse OS.

T4 rectal cancer: analysis of patient outcome after surgical excision.

Locally advanced rectal cancer dictates a major surgical undertaking, which includes en bloc resection of the rectum and all involved organs. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient outcome and compare multimodality treatment options after various surgical approaches from one institution for T4 rectal cancer. A retrospective chart review identified 24 patients who were operated on for advanced primary rectal cancer invading adjacent structures (T4) over a 5(1/2)-year period. The types of treatment and outcome were analyzed. From these 24 patients, the most frequently involved organ was the bladder (33%). A total of 16 patients underwent chemoradiotherapy. There were 12 complications (50%), the most common being wound infection (33% of complications, 17% overall). Nine patients had nodal disease. Disease-free survival was 54 per cent, and overall survival was 75 per cent. However, disease-free survival in node-negative patients was 67 per cent versus 33 per cent in node-positive individuals. Out of the six patients who died in this review, five (83%) received chemoradiotherapy. Operations for advanced primary rectal cancer with involvement of adjacent organs are major procedures associated with high morbidity. Patients without nodal disease may have long-term survival despite the locally advanced tumor. Interestingly, neoadjuvant therapy, adjuvant, or both, did not increase survival.

Preventing intra-abdominal adhesions with polylactic acid film: an animal study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an absorbable polylactic acid film (SurgiWrap) in preventing postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions in an animal model. METHODS: Forty-four female Sprague-Dawley rats underwent laparotomy with subsequent cecal wall abrasion and abdominal wall injury. Rats were divided equally between untreated and treated groups. Treated rats had a polylactic acid film (SurgiWrap) placed between the cecal and abdominal wall defects. Rats in the untreated group received no barrier material. The animals were killed on postoperative day 21. Two blinded observers, using predetermined criteria, graded the cecum-to-abdominal wall adhesions and estimated the percent of cecal surface area involved in the adhesion. The adhesions were classified as absent, moderate, or severe. RESULTS: Four rats died postoperatively. Of surviving rats, all of the rats in the untreated group had cecum-to-abdominal wall adhesions, whereas 42.1 percent of rats in the treated group had no adhesions between the cecum and the abdominal wall (two-tailed, P = 0.001). Altogether, 28.6 percent and 71.4 percent of untreated rats experienced moderate and severe adhesions, respectively, compared to 47.4 percent and 10.5 percent of treated rats (two-tailed, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Strategic placement of polylactic acid film during abdominal surgery is associated with a significantly reduced rate and severity of postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions in this model. A technique for film placement is suggested.

Primary malignant melanoma of the right colon.

The small and large intestines are the most common sites for metastases from cutaneous malignant melanoma. However, primary melanomas in these sites are exceedingly rare. There are several case reports of patients with primary melanoma of the small bowel, but finding of a solitary primary melanoma in the colon is exceedingly rare. We describe a patient that was operated on for bowel obstruction due to colonic intussusception resulting from a right colonic tumor. Histopathological examination confirmed a diagnosis of malignant melanoma. A thorough postoperative investigation did not reveal a primary lesion in any other site. Two years after surgery, there was no evidence for recurrent disease. The treatment and prognosis of metastatic and primary melanoma of the gastrointestinal tract is discussed as well as the embryonic base for development of primary malignant melanoma of the intestine. Primary malignant melanoma of the intestine is an extremely rare lesion that may arise in the large bowel as well. It must be differentiated from other intestinal tumors and mandates a thorough investigation to rule out the possibility of being a metastasis from another more common primary site.