Pilot validation of an individualised pharmacokinetic algorithm for protamine dosing after systemic heparinisation for cardiopulmonary bypass.

INTRODUCTION: This manuscript represents a pilot study assessing the feasibility of a single-compartment, individualised, pharmacokinetic algorithm for protamine dosing after cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: A pilot cohort study in a specialist NHS cardiothoracic hospital targeting patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass. Patients received protamine doses according to a pharmacokinetic algorithm (n = 30) or using an empirical, fixed-dose model (n = 30). Categorical differences between the groups were evaluated using the Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. Continuous data was analysed using a paired Student's t-test for parametric data and the paired samples Wilcoxon test for non-parametric data. RESULTS: Patients who had protamine dosing according to the algorithm demonstrated a lower protamine requirement post-bypass relative to empirical management as measured by absolute dose (243 ± 49mg vs. 305 ± 34.7mg; p<0.001) and the heparin to protamine ratio (0.79 ± 0.12 vs. 1.1 ± 0.15; p<0.001). There was no difference in the pre- to post-bypass activated clotting time (ACT) ratio (1.05 ± 0.12 vs. 1.02 ± 0.15; p=0.9). Patients who received protamine according to the algorithm had no significant difference in transfusion requirement (13.3% vs. 30.0%; p=0.21). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that an individualized pharmacokinetic algorithm for the reversal of heparin after cardiopulmonary bypass is feasible in comparison with a fixed dosing strategy and may reduce the protamine requirement following on-pump cardiac surgery.

Relationship between psychoncology and psychoneuroendocrinoimmunology (PNEI): enhanced T-regulatory lymphocyte activity in cancer patients with self-punishement, evaluated by Rorschach test.

BACKGROUND: Psychological studies have documented the presence of a self-punishment profile in cancer patients. Recent immuno-oncological studies have shown that within the group of CD4(+) cells, which play a fundamental role in the generation of anticancer immunity, there is a subtype of cells that in contrast mediates the suppression of the anticancer immunity, the so-called T-regulatory cells (T-reg), which may be identified as CD4(+)CD25(+) cells. PATIENTS AND METHODS: On this basis, we performed a psychoncological study to evaluate CD4(+)CD25(+) cell numbers in relation to the response to Rorschach's test in a group of 30 cancer patients suffering from the most frequent tumor histotypes. RESULTS: Normal values obtained in our laboratory (95% confidence limits) of T-reg lymphocytes and CD4(+)/CD4(+)CD25(+) were <240/mm(3) and >4mm(3), respectively. The psychological profile of self-punishment was found in 18/30 patients (60%). The percentage of patients with abnormally high CD4(+)CD25(+) values observed in the group with self-punishment was significantly higher than that found in patients without self punishment (11/18 vs. 3/12 (25%), p<0.05). In the same way, the percentage of patients with abnormally low CD4(+)/CD4(+)CD25(+) ratios was significantly higher in the group with self-punishment (16/18 vs. 4/12, p<0.01). The mean numbers of T-reg lymphocytes observed in the group with self-punishment was significantly higher than that found in patients who had no self-punishment (314+/-39 vs. 173+/-27, p<0.05). In addition, the mean CD4(+)/ CD4(+)CD25(+) ratio was significantly lower in patients with self-punishment than in the other group (2.6+/-0.2 vs. 5.2+/-0.8, p<0.025). On the contrary, no significant difference was seen in the mean number of CD4(+) lymphocytes. CONCLUSION: The study suggests that self-punishment may inhibit the generation of an effective anticancer immune response by stimulating the activation and proliferation of T-reg lymphocytes, which in turn stimulate tumor dissemination by suppressing anticancer immunity. The abnormally high number of T-reg lymphocytes in patients with self-punishment would suggest a specific immune alteration, as suggested by the evidence of a normal profile for other immune parameters, such as total CD4(+) lymphocytes.

Enhancement of the efficacy of cancer chemotherapy by the pineal hormone melatonin and its relation with the psychospiritual status of cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The anti-oxidant and immunomodulating natural agents may enhance the efficacy of cancer chemotherapy. One of the most important agents is the pineal hormone melatonin (MLT) which may exert both anti-oxidant and antiproliferative immunostimulating anticancer effects. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of a biochemotherapeutic regimen in metastatic cancer patients, and its therapeutic activity in relation to the psychospiritual status of patients. METHODS: The study included 50 metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and a control group of 100 patients. Chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin plus gemcitabine. MLT was given orally at 20 mg/day in the evening. Patients were subdivided into 5 psychic profiles, as follows: spiritual faith, rationale faith, anxiety, apathy, and accusation behavior. RESULTS: Tumor response rate was significantly higher in patients treated by chemotherapy plus MLT than in those treated by chemotherapy alone (21/50 vs. 24/100, p < 0.001). However, the percentage of objective tumor regressions obtained in patients with spiritual faith was significantly higher than that found in the overall other patients concomitantly treated by chemotherapy plus MLT (6/8 vs. 15/42, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the efficacy of chemotherapy may be enhanced by the pineal hormone MLT, by representing a new promising biochemotherapeutic combination; also despite its objective ability to enhance chemotherapy efficacy, the activity of MLT is depending at least in part on the psychospiritual status of cancer patients, and it is maximal in the presence of a real spiritual faith.