Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Int J Mol Sci ; 20(2)2019 Jan 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30642068

ABSTRACT

Platelet rich plasma (PRP) is blood plasma with a platelet concentration above baseline. When activated, PRP releases growth factors involved in all stages of wound healing, potentially boosting the healing process. To expand our knowledge of the effectiveness of PRP, it is crucial to know the content and composition of PRP products. In this study, growth factor quantification measurements of PRP from burn patients and gender- and age-matched controls were performed. The PRP of burn patients showed levels of growth factors comparable to those of the PRP of healthy volunteers. Considerable intra-individual variation in growth factor content was found. However, a correlation was found between the platelet count of the PRP and most of the growth factors measured.


Subject(s)
Burns/therapy , Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/analysis , Platelet-Rich Plasma/chemistry , Adult , Aged , Burns/blood , Case-Control Studies , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Platelet Count , Platelet-Rich Plasma/physiology , Wound Healing
2.
Platelets ; 30(3): 396-402, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29553873

ABSTRACT

Burn injury has severe impact on the physiologic homeostasis. Platelet counts show a distinct course post-burn injury, with a nadir at day 3 followed by a thrombocytotic period with at peak at day 15, with a gradual return to normal. So far, it is unknown how the functionality and activational status of platelets develop post burn. In this study, we investigated if the function, activation and growth factor content of platelets of burn patients are affected and how this evolves in time. Six burn patients with over 15% total burned surface area were followed during 1 month. Standard hematological and coagulation analyses, thromboelastography (TEG), platelet-function analyzer-100 (PFA), several platelet activation parameters (CD62P-CD63, AnnexinV) and growth factors (TGFb1, VEGF, PDGF-AB/BB, EGF, TGFb2, FGF-2, PDGF-AA) analyses were performed. TEG analyses showed procoagulant changes. PFA-100 analyses were nearly all within normal range. CD62P and CD63 and Annexin-V indicated no clear activation of platelets. Growth factor content followed the same course as the platelet count, reflecting a constant growth factor per platelet ratio. Concluding, platelets post burn-injury appears to be functional and not overly activated. However, burn patients seem to remain in a procoagulant state for an extensive period, which may impact their pathology.


Subject(s)
Burns/blood , Platelet Activation/physiology , Platelet-Rich Plasma/metabolism , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
3.
Wound Repair Regen ; 24(4): 712-20, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27169627

ABSTRACT

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a fraction of blood with a platelet concentration above baseline. When platelets get activated, growth factors involved in wound healing are released. The application of PRP has shown good results in wound care, however, up to date no substantial research has been performed on the effect of PRP in burn treatment. This randomized double blind intra-patient controlled study investigates the effect of autologous PRP on wound healing in burns that require surgery with a meshed split skin graft (SSG). Fifty-two patients with various areas of deep dermal to full thickness burns, receiving surgery with a SSG were included after informed consent. Comparable study areas A and B (intra-patient) were appointed, randomized and either treated with a SSG and PRP or with a SSG alone. At day 5 to 7 postoperative, the epithelialization and graft take rate were assessed. Three, six, and twelve months postoperative, follow-up measurements were performed in the form of POSAS-questionnaires, DermoSpectroMeter, and Cutometer measurements. There was no statistically significant difference between the mean take rate nor the mean epithelialization rate at day 5-7 between the PRP-treated and control areas. However, PRP-treated wound areas showed more often better or equal epithelialization and take rates at day 5-7 than the standard treated areas. Minor effects were also seen in the reoperated and early operated subgroups. At 3, 6, and 12 months postoperative, POSAS scores from the patients and the observers, Dermaspectro-, and Cutometer measurements did not depict a significant difference between the PRP and standard treated areas. Concluding, the addition of PRP in the treatment of burn wounds did not result in improved graft take and epithelialization, nor could we demonstrate better scar quality. There was, however, a considerable variation in our clinical population.


Subject(s)
Blood Transfusion, Autologous , Burns/therapy , Graft Survival/physiology , Platelet-Rich Plasma , Re-Epithelialization/physiology , Skin Transplantation/methods , Wound Healing/physiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Blood Transfusion, Autologous/methods , Burns/pathology , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
4.
Cell Transplant ; 25(3): 437-48, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26419871

ABSTRACT

Standard treatment for large burns is transplantation with meshed split skin autografts (SSGs). A disadvantage of this treatment is that healing is accompanied by scar formation. Application of autologous epidermal cells (keratinocytes and melanocytes) may be a suitable therapeutic alternative, since this may enhance wound closure and improve scar quality. A prospective, multicenter randomized clinical trial was performed in 40 adult patients with acute full thickness burns. On two comparable wound areas, conventional treatment with SSGs was compared to an experimental treatment consisting of SSGs in combination with cultured autologous epidermal cells (ECs) seeded in a collagen carrier. The primary outcome measure was wound closure after 5-7 days. Secondary outcomes were safety aspects and scar quality measured by graft take, scar score (POSAS), skin colorimeter (DermaSpectrometer) and elasticity (Cutometer). Wound epithelialization after 5-7 days was significantly better for the experimental treatment (71%) compared to the standard treatment (67%) (p = 0.034, Wilcoxon), whereas the take rates of the grafts were similar. No related adverse events were recorded. Scar quality was evaluated at 3 (n = 33) and 12 (n = 28) months. The POSAS of the observer after 3 and 12 months and of the patient after 12 months were significantly better for the experimental area. Improvements between 12% and 23% (p ≤ 0.010, Wilcoxon) were detected for redness, pigmentation, thickness, relief, and pliability. Melanin index at 3 and 12 months and erythema index at 12 months were closer to normal skin for the experimental treatment than for conventional treatment (p ≤ 0.025 paired samples t-test). Skin elasticity showed significantly higher elasticity (p = 0.030) in the experimental area at 3 months follow-up. We showed a safe application and significant improvements of wound healing and scar quality in burn patients after treatment with ECs versus SSGs only. The relevance of cultured autologous cells in treatment of extensive burns is supported by our current findings.


Subject(s)
Burns/therapy , Cicatrix/therapy , Epidermal Cells , Epidermis/transplantation , Skin Transplantation/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Burns/pathology , Cell Proliferation , Cells, Cultured , Cicatrix/pathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Skin/cytology , Skin/pathology , Skin, Artificial , Transplantation, Autologous , Wound Healing , Young Adult
5.
J Burn Care Res ; 36(3): e153-61, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25051521

ABSTRACT

Treating burn scar contracture remains a challenging problem for reconstructive surgeons. At present, no consensus exists on when to use what kind of technique. Therefore, a systematic review was performed on the effectiveness of the different surgical techniques after burn scar contracture release. Electronic databases were searched using a predefined search strategy. Studies evaluating the outcome of surgical techniques for the treatment of burn scar contractures were included. The methodological quality was tested and the data were summarized. One thousand six hundred fourty-nine papers were identified of which 17 met the inclusion criteria. Three papers reported on a controlled trial, 14 were cohort studies, including 10 of a pre-post operative design and 4 of a comparative design. The papers described outcomes of grafts, flaps with random or defined vascularization, and dermal substitutes. All studies had methodological shortcomings and most used inappropriate statistical methods. The current evidence on the effectiveness of reconstruction techniques for burn scar contractures was summarized. Due to the scarcity and low quality of the included studies, no definitive conclusions could be reached about the effectiveness of different techniques. Therefore, no direct implications for daily practice could be made. However, recommendations could be given for improvement of the quality of further primary research on the effectiveness of surgical treatment strategies for burn scar contracture release.


Subject(s)
Burns/surgery , Contracture/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Skin Transplantation , Surgical Flaps , Burns/complications , Cicatrix/surgery , Contracture/etiology , Humans , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Reoperation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...