Symptomatic gallstone disease: Recurrence patterns and risk factors for relapse after first admission, the RELAPSTONE study.

BACKGROUND: Delayed cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic gallstone disease is associated with recurrence. Limited data on the recurrence patterns and the factors that determine them are available. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the pattern of relapse in each symptomatic gallstone disease (acute pancreatitis, cholecystitis, cholangitis, symptomatic choledocholithiasis, and biliary colic) and determine the associated factors. METHODS: RELAPSTONE was an international multicenter retrospective cohort study. Patients (n = 3016) from 18 tertiary centers who suffered a first episode of symptomatic gallstone disease from 2018 to 2020 and had not undergone cholecystectomy during admission were included. The main outcome was relapse-free survival. Kaplan-Meier curves were used in the bivariate analysis. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to identify prognostic factors associated with relapses. RESULTS: Mean age was 76.6 [IQR: 59.7-84.1], and 51% were male. The median follow-up was 5.3 months [IQR 2.1-12.4]. Relapse-free survival was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.77-0.80) at 3 months, 0.71 (95% CI: 0.69-0.73) at 6 months, and 0.63 (95% CI: 0.61-0.65) at 12 months. In multivariable analysis, older age (HR = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.49-0.66), sphincterotomy (HR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.49-0.68) and higher leukocyte count (HR = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.70-0.90) were independently associated with lower risk of relapse, whereas higher levels of alanine aminotransferase (HR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.02-1.46) and multiple cholelithiasis (HR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.05-1.34) were associated with higher relapse rates. CONCLUSION: The relapse rate is high and different in each symptomatic gallstone disease. Our independent predictors could be useful for prioritizing patients on the waiting list for cholecystectomies.

Estimation of liver fibrosis using elastography in cholestatic diseases: systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: staging fibrosis extent in liver disease is highly relevant for appropriate management. Liver biopsy remains the reference standard for assessment, but noninvasive methods such as elastography are becoming increasingly accurate and relevant. However, evidence regarding elastography in cholestatic diseases is lower than in other etiologies. METHODS: we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science for publications on the diagnostic accuracy of transient elastography and sonoelastography in cholestatic diseases (PBC and PSC) using biopsy as the reference standard. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the results was then carried out. RESULTS: a total of 13 studies were included. Using transient elastography in PBC sensitivity and specificity were estimated to be 0.76 and 0.93; 0.88 and 0.9; and 0.91 and 0.95 for ≥ F2, ≥ F3 and = F4, respectively. For sonoelastography in PBC sensitivity and specificity estimates were 0.79 and 0.82; 0.95 and 0.86; and 0.94 and 0.85 for ≥ F2, ≥ F3 y = F4, respectively. In PSC, transient elastography had a sensivity and specificity of 0.76 and 0.88; 0.91 and 0.86; and 0.71 and 0.93 for ≥ F2, ≥ F3 and = F4, respectively. CONCLUSION: elastography has adequate diagnostic accuracy in the assessment of fibrosis stages in cholestatic liver diseases.

Characteristics and outcome of incidental hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation: a cohort study

Introduction: despite advances in imaging diagnosticmodalities, hepatocellular carcinoma is sometimes incidentally diagnosed on histological examination of the liver explant. The objectives of the study were: a) to compare the characteristics between incidental and known hepatocellular carcinoma; and b) to estimate survival and tumor recurrence after liver transplantation.Material and methods: a retrospective, single-center study was performed. The inclusion criteria were: a) cirrhotic patients, age ≥ 18 years; b) liver transplantation between 1998 and 2018; and c) hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosed via histopathologic examination of the explanted liver. Cholangiocarcinoma and patients with early retransplantation were excluded. Multivariate analysis was performed using binomial logistic regression to assess the factors associated with incidental hepatocellular carcinoma. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to explore the impact on overall survival and recurrence free survival.Results: two hundred and sixty-nine patients were enrolled. The prevalence of incidental hepatocellular carcinoma was 4.18 % (95 % CI: 2.89-6.01 %) of all liver transplants performed in cirrhotic patients. The median diameter of the main nodule was smaller in incidental hepatocellular carcinoma (20 vs 27 mm, p = 0.004), although they were more likely to be beyond the Up-to-Seven criteria on explant examination (22.2 % vs 7.5 %, p = 0.001), with no differences in any other histological features. No differences were found in overall survival rates (incidental 70.2 % vs 70.4 %, p = 0.87) or recurrence-free survival (incidental 100 % vs 83.8 %, p = 0.07) at five years. Conclusion: incidental hepatocellular carcinoma are smaller in size and are more frequently found to be beyond the Up-to-Seven criteria. However, no differences were found in overall survival rates or recurrence-free survival, although there was no tumor recurrence in the incidental hepatocellular carcinoma group. (AU)

Characteristics and outcome of incidental hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation: a cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: despite advances in imaging diagnostic modalities, hepatocellular carcinoma is sometimes incidentally diagnosed on histological examination of the liver explant. The objectives of the study were: a) to compare the characteristics between incidental and known hepatocellular carcinoma; and b) to estimate survival and tumor recurrence after liver transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: a retrospective, single-center study was performed. The inclusion criteria were: a) cirrhotic patients, age ≥ 18 years; b) liver transplantation between 1998 and 2018; and c) hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosed via histopathologic examination of the explanted liver. Cholangiocarcinoma and patients with early retransplantation were excluded. Multivariate analysis was performed using binomial logistic regression to assess the factors associated with incidental hepatocellular carcinoma. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to explore the impact on overall survival and recurrence free survival. RESULTS: two hundred and sixty-nine patients were enrolled. The prevalence of incidental hepatocellular carcinoma was 4.18 % (95 % CI: 2.89-6.01 %) of all liver transplants performed in cirrhotic patients. The median diameter of the main nodule was smaller in incidental hepatocellular carcinoma (20 vs 27 mm, p = 0.004), although they were more likely to be beyond the Up-to-Seven criteria on explant examination (22.2 % vs 7.5 %, p = 0.001), with no differences in any other histological features. No differences were found in overall survival rates (incidental 70.2 % vs 70.4 %, p = 0.87) or recurrence-free survival (incidental 100 % vs 83.8 %, p = 0.07) at five years. CONCLUSION: incidental hepatocellular carcinoma are smaller in size and are more frequently found to be beyond the Up-to-Seven criteria. However, no differences were found in overall survival rates or recurrence-free survival, although there was no tumor recurrence in the incidental hepatocellular carcinoma group.

Antireflux mucosectomy (ARMS) and antireflux mucosal ablation (ARMA) for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background and study aims Antireflux mucosectomy (ARMS) and antireflux mucosal ablation (ARMA) are new endoscopic procedures for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We conducted a meta-analysis to systematically assess the feasibility, clinical success, and safety of these procedures. Patients and methods We searched Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Central from inception to October 2020. Overlapping reports, animal studies, and case reports were excluded. Our primary outcomes were clinical success and adverse events (AEs). Secondary outcomes included technical success, endoscopic esophagitis, 24-hour pH monitoring, and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use. A random effects model was used to pool data. Results In total, 15 nonrandomized studies (12 ARMS, n = 331; 3 ARMA, n = 130) were included; 10 were conducted in patients with refractory GERD. The technical success rate was 100 %. The pooled short-term (first assessment within the first 6 months), 1-year, and 3-year clinical success rates were 78 % (95 % confidence interval [95 %CI] 70 %-85 %), 72% (95 %CI 47 %-92 %), and 73 % (95 %CI 65 %-81 %), respectively. ARMS and ARMA yielded similar clinical success. The proportion of patients off PPIs at 1 year was 64 % (95 %CI 52 %-75 %). There were significant drops ( P  < 0.01) in validated clinical questionnaires scores, presence of esophagitis, and acid exposure time. The most common AE (11 %, 95 %CI 8 %-15 %) was dysphagia requiring dilation (7%, 95 %CI 5 %-11 %). Four cases of perforation were recorded, all in patients undergoing ARMS. Conclusions Our meta-analysis of nonrandomized studies suggests that ARMS and ARMA are safe and effective for patients with GERD.

Biliary sphincterotomy reduces the risk of acute gallstone pancreatitis recurrence in non-candidates for cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Population aging and comorbidity are leading to an increase in patients unfit for cholecystectomy. AIMS: To evaluate whether endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy after a first episode of acute gallstone pancreatitis reduces the risk of pancreatitis recurrence and gallstone-related events in non-surgical candidates. METHODS: Retrospective study of patients admitted for a first episode of acute gallstone pancreatitis rejected for cholecystectomy between 2013-2018. The role of endoscopic sphincterotomy was evaluated by adjusting for age, severity of pancreatitis, and presence of choledocholithiasis. RESULTS: We included 247 patients (mean age 80 ±â€¯12 years; Charlson index: 5; severity of pancreatitis: 72% mild). Sphincterotomy was performed in 23.9%. Recurrence of pancreatitis occurred in 17.4% patients (median follow-up: 426 days). The one-year cumulative incidence of a new episode of pancreatitis was 1.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.2-12%) and 23% (95% CI: 17-31%) in patients with and without sphincterotomy, respectively (p = 0.006). In multivariate analysis, sphincterotomy showed a protective role for recurrence of pancreatitis (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.08-0.92, p = 0.037) and for any gallstone-related event (HR 0.46, 95% CI: 0.21-0.98, p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy reduced the risk of gallstone pancreatitis recurrence and other biliary-related disorders in patients with a first episode of pancreatitis non-candidates for cholecystectomy.