Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Patient Educ Couns ; 92(2): 266-72, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23647980

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To develop a feasibility study of a theory-driven telephone counseling program to enhance psychosocial and physical well-being for cancer survivors after treatment. METHODS: Participants (n=66) were recruited from two Colorado hospitals with self-administered questionnaires at baseline and two weeks post-intervention. The one group, intervention only design included up to six thematic telephone counseling sessions over three months. Topics included nutrition, physical activity, stress management, and medical follow-up. Primary outcomes were cancer-specific distress, self-reported fruit and vegetable consumption and physical activity. RESULTS: Of 66 subjects, 46 completed at least one counseling module and the follow-up assessment (70% retention rate). Mean satisfaction was 9 out of 10, and all participants would recommend C-STEPS to other survivors. Cancer-specific distress (Impact of Event Scale - Intrusion subscale) decreased for entire study population (p<0.001) and stress management session participants (p<0.001). Fruit and vegetable consumption increased for nutrition and exercise session participants (p=0.02) and the entire sample (p=NS). Physical activity increased in the entire group (p=0.006) and for nutrition and exercise session participants (p=0.01). CONCLUSION AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: C-STEPS is a feasible telephone counseling program that transcends geographic barriers, demonstrating the potential to decrease distress and promote coping and healthy lifestyles among cancer survivors.


Subject(s)
Counseling/methods , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Survivors/psychology , Telephone , Adaptation, Psychological , Adult , Aged , Colorado , Feasibility Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Life Style , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/psychology , Neoplasms/therapy , Pilot Projects , Quality of Life , Social Support , Socioeconomic Factors , Stress, Psychological , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
2.
Nutr Cancer ; 65(1): 34-42, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23368911

ABSTRACT

Weight gain following breast cancer diagnosis is common, but limited data exists on whether this gain is in excess of that gained during normal aging. This study investigated weight patterns among women with and without breast cancer to determine the effects of the breast cancer experience on weight change. Using the SHINE 4-Corners Breast Cancer Study, 305 women with breast cancer and 345 women without were followed prospectively. Weight change of ≥5% was defined as the difference between the self-reported weight measurements obtained at breast cancer diagnosis (or referent date for women without breast cancer) and about 6 yr later. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used. Within this cohort, 60% of women were overweight or obese and 37% of women gained weight. No significant greater weight gain was observed between women with vs. without breast cancer [adjusted odds ratio (ORadj) = 1.15, 95% CI 0.79-1.68] or between Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic White women (ORadj = 1.09, 95% CI 0.72-1.66) after adjustment. Weight gain was associated with being younger and having a lower body mass index. Among breast cancer survivors, cancer treatment factors were not associated with weight gain. These results suggest that weight management approaches are needed, especially those targeted to at-risk populations such as breast cancer survivors.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/complications , Weight Gain , Adult , Aged , Arizona , Body Weight , Breast Neoplasms/ethnology , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Colorado , Female , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Logistic Models , Middle Aged , New Mexico , Obesity/etiology , Odds Ratio , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survivors , White People
3.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 33(2): 426-35, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22101228

ABSTRACT

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant cause of mortality and morbidity in the United States, much of which could be prevented through adequate screening. Consensus guidelines recommend that high-risk groups initiate screening earlier with colonoscopy and more frequently than average risk persons. However, a large proportion of high risk individuals do not receive regular colonoscopic screening. The Family Health Promotion Project (FHPP) is a randomized-controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a telephone-based counseling intervention to increase adherence to risk-appropriate colonoscopy screening in high risk individuals. Unaffected members of CRC families from two national cancer family registries were enrolled (n=632) and randomized to receive either a single session telephone counseling intervention using Motivational Interviewing techniques or a minimal mail-out intervention. The primary endpoint, rate of colonoscopy screening, was assessed at 6, 12 and 24 months post-enrollment. In this paper, we describe the research design and telephone counseling intervention of the FHPP trial, and report baseline data obtained from the two high risk cohorts recruited into this trial. Results obtained at baseline confirm the need for interventions to promote colonoscopy screening among these high risk individuals, as well as highlighting several key opportunities for intervention, including increasing knowledge about risk-appropriate screening guidelines, and providing both tailored risk information and barriers counseling.


Subject(s)
Colonoscopy/trends , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Family Health , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Registries , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Humans , Mass Screening/methods , Morbidity/trends , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Factors , Survival Rate/trends , United States/epidemiology
4.
J Health Psychol ; 14(7): 944-55, 2009 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19786521

ABSTRACT

The Latina Breast Cancer Screening (LBCS) was developed to measure Latinas' culturally-shared health beliefs about breast cancer and breast cancer screening. A 60-item LBCS scale was tested with 288 participants and reduced to 35 items using principal components analyses. The 35-item LBCS scale and other measures were administered to a second sample of 147 participants to establish the scale's validity and reliability. A six-factor solution suggested six LBCS sub-scales. The LBCS in its entirety displayed strong internal consistency (alpha =.93) with adequate estimates of convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity. The LBCS scale appears to be a valid and reliable measure.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Mass Screening/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colorado , Female , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Middle Aged
5.
Nutr J ; 7: 18, 2008 Jun 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18588696

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Self-reports of dietary intake in the context of nutrition intervention research can be biased by the tendency of respondents to answer consistent with expected norms (social approval bias). The objective of this study was to assess the potential influence of social approval bias on self-reports of fruit and vegetable intake obtained using both food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and 24-hour recall methods. METHODS: A randomized blinded trial compared reported fruit and vegetable intake among subjects exposed to a potentially biasing prompt to that from control subjects. Subjects included 163 women residing in Colorado between 35 and 65 years of age who were randomly selected and recruited by telephone to complete what they were told would be a future telephone survey about health. Randomly half of the subjects then received a letter prior to the interview describing this as a study of fruit and vegetable intake. The letter included a brief statement of the benefits of fruits and vegetables, a 5-A-Day sticker, and a 5-a-Day refrigerator magnet. The remainder received the same letter, but describing the study purpose only as a more general nutrition survey, with neither the fruit and vegetable message nor the 5-A-Day materials. Subjects were then interviewed on the telephone within 10 days following the letters using an eight-item FFQ and a limited 24-hour recall to estimate fruit and vegetable intake. All interviewers were blinded to the treatment condition. RESULTS: By the FFQ method, subjects who viewed the potentially biasing prompts reported consuming more fruits and vegetables than did control subjects (5.2 vs. 3.7 servings per day, p < 0.001). By the 24-hour recall method, 61% of the intervention group but only 32% of the control reported eating fruits and vegetables on 3 or more occasions the prior day (p = 0.002). These associations were independent of age, race/ethnicity, education level, self-perceived health status, and time since last medical check-up. CONCLUSION: Self-reports of fruit and vegetable intake using either a food frequency questionnaire or a limited 24-hour recall are both susceptible to substantial social approval bias. Valid assessments of intervention effects in nutritional intervention trials may require objective measures of dietary change.


Subject(s)
Diet Surveys , Diet/psychology , Fruit , Nutrition Assessment , Vegetables , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Mental Recall , Middle Aged , Self Concept , Self Disclosure , Social Conformity , Social Desirability , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
J Cancer Educ ; 22(1 Suppl): S70-3, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17572004

ABSTRACT

From its beginnings in the 1970s, the National Cancer Institute's (NCI's) Cancer Information Service (CIS) has developed as a vibrant program for providing health care professionals and the public with relevant cancer-related information through telephone, mail, and online communication. The CIS has become an important contributor to health communication and health education research. Through its network of community partnerships, it has disseminated relevant cancer information and health promotion programs to vulnerable and hard-to-reach populations. It has become a model for the development of health information and education programs around the world. However, the CIS is still growing; it is continually innovating and refining its programs and services. This concluding article examines the potential for increasing CIS contributions to cancer education and cancer control in the future.


Subject(s)
Access to Information , Health Education , Health Services Needs and Demand , Information Dissemination , Information Services/trends , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Neoplasms , Communication , Cooperative Behavior , Humans , United States
7.
Addict Behav ; 31(3): 509-18, 2006 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15979815

ABSTRACT

There is a need for innovative approaches capable of reaching smokers who would not otherwise participate in efforts to modify their smoking. This paper reports on two studies to determine whether a smoking reduction intervention would appeal to additional or different types of smokers than do cessation interventions. Study 1 attempted to contact 160 HMO smokers scheduled for outpatient surgeries. In Study 2, actual pilot reduction and cessation programs were offered to 531 smokers about to undergo out-patient surgeries or procedures. In Study 1, 39% of those eligible elected smoking reduction; and 38% selected cessation. In Study 2 of those eligible, 22% began participation in the smoking reduction program; 12% preferred a cessation approach; and 65% declined. There were few demographic or smoking history differences among those who elected smoking reduction, cessation, or declined. Among this understudied population, a sizable proportion in both studies agreed to participate in smoking reduction. If replicated, this suggests that comprehensive programs that include a smoking reduction component could substantially increase their reach.


Subject(s)
Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Smoking Cessation/methods , Smoking Prevention , Aged , Community Health Services/organization & administration , Female , Health Behavior , Health Promotion , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Motivation , Surveys and Questionnaires
8.
J Health Commun ; 10 Suppl 1: 35-52, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16377599

ABSTRACT

Since searching for health information is among the most popular uses of the Internet, we analyzed a survey of 6,019 callers to the National Cancer Institute's (NCI's) Cancer Information Service (CIS) to assess Internet usage and interest in technologies to access health and cancer information. Findings suggest that about 40% of CIS callers used the Internet to obtain cancer information and, of these, only about 20% found all the information they sought. Nearly 33% of Internet users called the CIS to discuss information found on the Internet; most (>90%) reported that the CIS was helpful. Those who sought cancer information on the Internet were more likely to call the CIS about this information if they found all or most of the information they were seeking, compared with those who found some or little of the information. New communication services endorsed by most CIS callers included e-mails from an information specialist and telephone support from the CIS while on the Internet. The survey results indicate the importance of multiple access points, both traditional and technology based, and that there is still a need for more traditional, personalized forms of health communication. A crucial question is how best to harness and integrate these new technologies within the current generation of mediated health information systems.


Subject(s)
Communication , Health Education/methods , Information Services/statistics & numerical data , Internet , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Adult , Aged , Consumer Behavior , Data Collection , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms , Telephone , United States
9.
J Health Commun ; 10 Suppl 1: 105-18, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16377603

ABSTRACT

Self-help materials computer-tailored to the specific needs of smokers have shown promise as a high-reach, low-cost intervention for smoking cessation. Adding tailored cessation materials to telephone-based cessation counseling may be a way of generating greater efficacy in promoting and maintaining cessation. The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of adding different types of behavioral smoking cessation materials to brief telephone-based cessation counseling.A total of 1,978 smokers calling the National Cancer Institute's (NCI's) Cancer Information Service (CIS) for help in quitting smoking initially received brief cognitive-behavioral cessation counseling from a CIS information specialist. Following a baseline interview administered by the information specialist, subjects were randomly assigned to one of four conditions, each delivered by U.S. mail: a single, untailored smoking cessation guide (SU); a single, tailored smoking cessation guide (ST); a series of four (multiple) printed materials tailored only to baseline data (MT); and a series of four (multiple) printed materials tailored to baseline as well as retailored using 5-month interim progress data (MRT). The primary outcome measure was 7-day point prevalence abstinence rates assessed using a computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) at 12-month follow-up.At 12-month follow-up, using intent-to-treat, imputed, and per-protocol analyses, no differences were found among the four experimental conditions (linear trend), or when the ST, MT, and MRT groups were compared with the control (SU) group. Participants in the two multiple message group conditions combined (MT + MRT), however, had significantly higher abstinence rates than participants in the two single message group conditions combined (SU + ST). Moreover, among subjects who reported quitting at the 5-month follow-up, participants receiving the MRT materials reported higher abstinence rates at 12 months than the other three groups combined (SU + ST + MT). The results of this study support the effectiveness, over and above a single telecounseling interaction, of multiple tailored print material contacts on cessation. These effects, however may be due to tailoring, or the longitudinal nature of the two multiple tailored conditions, or both. The strongest evidence for tailoring occurred in the MRT condition for relapse prevention, suggesting that print materials tailored to interim progress may be especially effective in this context. The qualities of specific psychosocial and communication elements in tailored materials should receive attention in future research.


Subject(s)
Counseling , Information Services , Smoking Cessation/methods , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Telephone , Treatment Outcome , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...