Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
J Heart Lung Transplant ; 19(5): 444-52, 2000 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10808151

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We compared the assessment of left ventricular function and mass by M-mode echocardiography (echo) with fast breath-hold cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients who received orthotopic heart transplantation. We also sought to establish the reproducibility of breath-hold CMR in this patient population. METHODS: We prospectively acquired 51 sets of echo and CMR data in 21 patients who had undergone orthotopic heart transplantation. We examined the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of breath-hold CMR in this group and compared it with published data. We compared the left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) and mass determined by echo with the CMR data. RESULTS: The average time between CMR and echo was 0 +/- 7 days (mean +/- SD), the time between each set of CMR-echo data acquisition was 5.1 +/- 4.1 months. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance showed good reproducibility in this population, with intraobserver percentage variability of 2.2% +/- 2.4% for EF and 3. 2% +/- 2.7% for mass, and interobserver percentage variability of 2. 4% +/- 1.9% for EF and 2.2% +/- 1.9% for mass. The Bland-Altman limits of agreement between echo and CMR were wide for both EF (-9. 6% to 15%) and mass, irrespective of the formula used (-61.3 to 198 g for the Bennett and Evans formula, -65.4 to 196.8 g for the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) formula, -65.3 to 181 g for the Devereux formula, and -95.2 to 64.6 g for the Teichholz formula). CONCLUSION: Fast-acquisition CMR is reproducible in recipients of transplanted hearts. We found poor agreement with the results of echo. The choice of technique will depend on local resources as well as the clinical importance of the result. Echo remains readily available and gives rapid assessment of volumes, EF, and mass. However, the good reproducibility of CMR may make it a more suitable technique for long-term follow-up of an individual or of a study population.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Volume/physiology , Echocardiography , Heart Transplantation , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Ventricular Function, Left/physiology , Ventricular Function , Heart Transplantation/diagnostic imaging , Heart Transplantation/physiology , Heart Ventricles/anatomy & histology , Heart Ventricles/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Mathematics , Observer Variation , Organ Size , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Stroke Volume
3.
Clin Sci (Lond) ; 97(6): 689-95, 1999 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10585896

ABSTRACT

Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and N-terminal ANP are good research indices of the severity of heart failure. The stability of these peptides at room temperature has become an important factor in assessing their use as indicators of cardiac function in routine clinical practice. Inhibitors such as aprotinin are routinely added in the blood collection process, but may provide no benefit in sample collection and routine clinical practice. We assessed the stability of BNP, ANP and N-terminal ANP in blood samples collected in either the presence or the absence of the protease inhibitor aprotinin. Blood, either with or without aprotinin, was processed immediately (initial; 0 h) and after blood samples had been left for 3 h, 2 days or 3 days at room temperature. These times were chosen to reflect processing in a hospital outpatient clinic (2-3 h), or when posted from general practice (2-3 days). Initial plasma BNP, ANP and N-terminal ANP levels in the absence of aprotinin were 28.2+/-5.4, 44.2+/-7.9 and 1997+/-608 pg/ml respectively, and were not significantly different from initial values in the presence of aprotinin (29.0+/-5.9, 45.2+/-8.0 and 2009+/-579 pg/ml respectively). After 3 h at room temperature, there was a significant fall in ANP in the absence of aprotinin (36. 7+/-7.9 pg/ml; P<0.005), but not in the presence of aprotinin (41. 2+/-7.6 pg/ml). Both BNP and N-terminal ANP were unchanged in either the absence (BNP, 27.6+/-5.5 pg/ml; N-terminal ANP, 2099+/-613 pg/ml) or the presence (BNP, 29.4+/-5.6 pg/ml; N-terminal ANP, 1988+/-600 pg/ml) of aprotinin. After 2 days at room temperature, ANP had fallen significantly in both the absence (16.9+/-3.4 pg/ml) and the presence (24.0+/-5.0 pg/ml) of aprotinin compared with initial values, and there was a significant difference in ANP levels in the absence and presence of aprotinin (P<0.001). ANP levels had decreased further after 3 days at room temperature, to 11.9+/-3.4 pg/ml (no aprotinin) and 20.3+/-5.0 pg/ml (aprotinin added); these values were significantly different (P=0.002). In contrast, there was no change in the levels of BNP or N-terminal ANP after 2 or 3 days at room temperature, in either the absence or the presence of aprotinin. These studies indicate that aprotinin adds little benefit to the stability of cardiac peptides at room temperature. Blood samples for BNP and N-terminal ANP measurement used as a test of heart function in hospital clinics and by general practitioners in the community could be taken into blood tubes containing only EDTA as anticoagulant and without the additional step of adding the routinely used inhibitor aprotinin.


Subject(s)
Aprotinin/pharmacology , Atrial Natriuretic Factor/blood , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Hemostatics/pharmacology , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain/blood , Adult , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Biomarkers/blood , Blood Specimen Collection , Heart Transplantation , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Protein Precursors/blood , Temperature , Time Factors
5.
Clin Sci (Lond) ; 95(3): 235-9, 1998 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9730841

ABSTRACT

1.BNP and ANP are important research indices of severity of heart failure. However, uncertainty regarding the stability of these peptides at room temperature has limited their use to assess cardiac function in routine clinical practice. 2. We assessed the stability of BNP and ANP in blood samples left for 2 h or 2 days at room temperature compared with levels in blood processed immediately (initial). These times were chosen to reflect possible times for samples to be processed in a hospital outpatient clinic (2 h) or a blood sample posted to a laboratory from general practice (2 days). Samples were obtained from eight heart transplant recipients. Blood was separated and plasma stored immediately after collection (initial) and after 2 h or 2 days at room temperature respectively. 3. Initial plasma BNP and ANP values measured by radioimmunoassay after Sep-Pak extraction were 38.9+/-11.1(S.E.M.) pg/ml and 113.6+/-28.1 pg/ml, respectively. After 2 h at room temperature there was no significant fall in either peptide level (35.5+/-9.9 pg/ml, BNP; 104. 9+/-30.6 pg/ml, ANP). However, after 2 days at room temperature there was a significant fall in ANP to 38.1+/-12.6 pg/ml (P<0.005 versus initial level). In contrast, there was no significant fall in BNP after 2 days (32.0+/-8.4 pg/ml). After 2 days at room temperature only 30.4+/-4.3% of the ANP remained, but 86.0+/-5.0% of BNP compared with the initial ANP and BNP measurements. 4. Our study clearly showed that ANP is stable for 2 h and thus could be useful as a screening test for heart disease in hospital. In contrast, BNP remained stable for 2 days. Measuring BNP may thus be practical as a test of heart function both for routine use in hospital and by general practitioners in the community.


Subject(s)
Atrial Natriuretic Factor/blood , Heart Transplantation , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain/blood , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers/blood , Chromatography, Gel , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Molecular Weight , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain/chemistry , Radioimmunoassay , Sensitivity and Specificity , Time Factors
7.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil ; 8(2): 89-93, 1997 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24572750

ABSTRACT

An increasing number of physicians from a variety of disciplines are specializing in the treatment of patients with pain, and reporting treatment success using disparate interventions. Due to the lack of standardized evaluations of patients with pain, however, it has been impossible to reasonably assess the claims of any facility and even more difficult to compare the types of treatments from a variety of treatment settings. This paper will describe the process of the fomation of the Uniform Outcome Measures Committee of the American Academy of Pain Medicine. The deliberations of the Committee and the status of the development of a data collection system package will be described.

8.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil ; 8(2): 95-107, 1997 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24572751

ABSTRACT

Decades of debate have yet to yield a universal solution to the treatment of low back pain, a problem that afflicts 80% of adults in the United States at some point of their lives [1,2]. Exercise, in general, has become widely recognized as playing a large role in the rehabilitation of back pain sufferers. Yet, there is no consensus on which types of exercises to utilize. Most exercise techniques address the muscles with the specific purpose of impacting the skeleton or the spinal cord and nerve roots, rather than the muscles themselves. This reinforces the notion that muscles are not the direct source of pain, but rather only reflect pathology elsewhere. We reintroduce a rational exercise regimen first developed by Hans Kraus, M.D. in 1949. This regimen was shaped over a period of several years, through usage by thousands of back pain sufferers. It directly addresses specific trunk muscle deficiencies and tension, which are postulated by the authors to be the major factors producing low back pain. The exercise protocol has shown to be highly effective and inexpensive to administer on a wide-scale basis. Recent clinical experiences utilizing the Kraus techniques are discussed.

9.
Int J Addict ; 12(1): 173-81, 1977 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-863561

ABSTRACT

This paper points out the relationship that exists between treatment approaches with drug addicts and sociodemographic characteristics of the communities affected. It has been shown that while poor and middle class communities show good results with methadone maintenance approaches, in the area of secondary drug abuse they show marked dissimilarities. Also, the reasons for discharge are markedly different. It is speculated that the different attitudes existing at the two clinics studied provide contrasting environments that are selectively detrimental to program dropouts.


Subject(s)
Heroin Dependence/rehabilitation , Methadone/therapeutic use , Adult , Crime , Demography , Employment , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , New York City , Patient Dropouts , Socioeconomic Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...