ABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: Introduction Crush syndrome, of which little is known, occurs as a result of compression injury to the muscles. This syndrome is characterized by systemic manifestations such as acute kidney injury (AKI), hypovolemic shock, and hydroelectrolytic variations. This pathology presents high morbidity and mortality if not managed aggressively by prehospital care. Clinical Case A 40-year-old worker was rescued after being buried underground in a ditch for 19 hours. The patient was administered early resuscitation with isotonic solutions and monitored during the entire rescue operation. Despite having increased plasma levels of total creatine kinase (CK), the patient did not develop AKI or hydroelectrolytic variations. CONCLUSION: Aggressive early management with isotonic solutions before hospital arrival is an effective option for nephron-protection and prevention of crush syndrome. Mardones A , Arellano P , Rojas C , Gutierrez R , Oliver N , Borgna V . Prevention of crush syndrome through aggressive early resuscitation: clinical case in a buried worker. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016;31(3):340-342.
Subject(s)
Crush Syndrome/prevention & control , Disasters , Fluid Therapy , Resuscitation/methods , Adult , Crush Syndrome/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Un creciente número de países han decidido incluir médicos en sus sistemas de atención prehospitalaria, tanto para la atención de emergencias fuera del hospital, como para traslados interhospitalarios de pacientes críticos. Nuestro objetivo es revisar la evidencia científica que los ha llevado a tomar esta decisión. La evidencia muestra mayormente que la inclusión de médicos en los equipos de atención prehospitalaria: disminuye la morbimortalidad del paciente crítico, descongestiona los servicios de urgencias, permite concentrar las unidades de pacientes críticos, mejora las condiciones de traslado de pacientes complejos, optimiza el manejo de incidentes con múltiples víctimas y desastres, mejora los resultados de la intubación endotraqueal, permite la realización de maniobras invasivas prehospitalarias en pacientes traumatizados graves seleccionados, entre otros beneficios. Por todas estas razones, creemos que la evidencia científica demuestra que la inclusión de médicos en la atención prehospitalaria es beneficiosa en emergencias con pacientes graves (especialmente cuando el tiempo de traslado es prolongado) y en traslados interhospitalarios de pacientes críticos inestables. Estos equipos deberían implementarse en Chile para reforzar y articular las redes públicas de urgencias y unidades de pacientes críticos.
A growing number of countries have decided to include physicians in prehospital care systems, both for emergency care outside the hospital and for interhospital transfer of critically ill patients. Our goal is to review the scientific evidence that has led them to take this decision. Medicalized prehospital teams increases survival of critically ill patients, clears up emergency departments, concentrates critical care units, improves interhospital critical care transfer, improves multiple casualty incidents and disaster management, allowes prehospital endotracheal intubation and finally allowes prehospital invasive procedures in severely injured patients. Supported on scientific evidence, we believe that the inclusion of physicians in prehospital care is beneficial. These teams should be promptly created in Chile to strength emergency departments and critical care networks.
