ABSTRACT
Normal haemostasis depends on an intricate balance between mechanisms of bleeding and mechanisms of thrombosis, and this balance can be altered after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Impaired haemostasis could exacerbate the primary insult with risk of initiation or aggravation of bleeding; anticoagulant use at the time of injury can also contribute to bleeding risk after TBI. Many patients with TBI have abnormalities on conventional coagulation tests at admission to the emergency department, and the presence of coagulopathy is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Further blood testing often reveals a range of changes affecting platelet numbers and function, procoagulant or anticoagulant factors, fibrinolysis, and interactions between the coagulation system and the vascular endothelium, brain tissue, inflammatory mechanisms, and blood flow dynamics. However, the degree to which these coagulation abnormalities affect TBI outcomes and whether they are modifiable risk factors are not known. Although the main challenge for management is to address the risk of hypocoagulopathy with prolonged bleeding and progression of haemorrhagic lesions, the risk of hypercoagulopathy with an increased prothrombotic tendency also warrants consideration.
Subject(s)
Blood Coagulation Disorders , Brain Injuries, Traumatic , Cerebral Hemorrhage , Hemostasis , Blood Coagulation Disorders/diagnosis , Blood Coagulation Disorders/drug therapy , Blood Coagulation Disorders/etiology , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/complications , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/drug therapy , Cerebral Hemorrhage/etiology , HumansABSTRACT
Much controversy exists about pneumonia in intensive care-especially, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP)-about its diagnosis and its attributable mortality. A better consensus exists about its prevention and its treatment. VAP occurs in already critically ill patients, and the relationship between preexisting organ dysfunction or failures and the severity of VAP has been recently highlighted. The role of the underlying disease should be considered as dominant, and this fact explains the paradox that exists between the high mortality of VAP and the relative minor effect of prevention measures on mortality.