Endoscopic Recognition and Classification of Colorectal Polyps.

Colonoscopy allows the performing endoscopist to thoroughly evaluate superficial colon lesions based on morphologic features such as size, location, shape, and surface pattern and also perform endoscopic resection where appropriate. Different elements of polyp characterization have been incorporated into systems that standardize this evaluation process and elucidate the likelihood of submucosal invasion or malignancy. Lesions which have invaded the submucosa are more likely to metastasize and are often not appropriate for endoscopic resection. It is, therefore, essential for the proceduralist to understand the multiple elements of lesion characterization and how they fit into the existing classification schemes.

Risk of bleeding following double balloon enteroscopy in patients on continued antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation therapy.

Background and study aims Anticoagulation (AC) and antiplatelet (AP) therapy may increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding after double balloon enteroscopy (DBE); however, limited data are currently available regarding the incidence. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and clinical characteristics of post-DBE bleeding in patients on AC and AP therapy. Patients and methods The medical records of patients who underwent DBE between 2009 and 2013 at Mayo Clinic, Florida, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups: 1) continued AP therapy; 2) AC therapy; and 3) neither AP nor AC at the time of DBE. Follow-up data were collected at 60 days and 1 year. Results A total of 683 patients were identified; 43 on AC, 183 on AP and 457 not on AP or AC therapy. The most common indication for DBE was obscure gastrointestinal bleeding in the groups on and not on AP (85.3 % vs 70.9 %, P  < 0.0001). There was no statistical difference in post-DBE bleeding rates in patients on AP vs not on AP at 60 days (11.5 % vs 7.5 %, P  = 0.12) or 1 year (19.9 % vs 15.7 %, P  = 0.23). Rates of bleeding in patients on AC were 11.6 % within 60 days and 22.5 % within 1 year. Multivariate analysis reflected American Society of Anesthesiologist > 3 and indication for DBE of GI bleeding were independent risk factors for post-DBE bleeding within 1 year. Conclusions Continued antiplatelet use at the time of DBE was not an independent risk factor for bleeding post-DBE at 60 days or 1 year of follow up.

Hereditary hemochromatosis is associated with increased use of joint replacement surgery: Results of a nationwide analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) may lead to iron deposition-mediated arthropathy, causing progressive joint degeneration, necessitating replacement arthroplasty. Studies have noted an increased need for replacement arthroplasty in patients with HH. We aimed to compare the use of replacement arthroplasty and inpatient economic burden in patients with and without HH. METHODS: For our retrospective cohort study, we used the 2014 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Patients with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code for HH were included. The primary outcome was use of replacement arthroplasty; secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay, hospital costs, and total hospitalization charges. Multivariate logistic regression yielded confounder-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and means. RESULTS: Of 18,250 patients with HH, 7,483 (41.0%) were women and 1,155 (6.3%) underwent replacement arthroplasty. Mean (SD) age for patients with HH and arthroplasty was 66 (18) years. The percentage of patients with HH who underwent replacement arthroplasty was higher than those without HH (3.4%; P<.01). On multivariate analysis, young-adult females and elderly patients with HH were more likely to undergo replacement arthroplasty compared to those without HH of the corresponding gender and age group. Mean length of stay, hospital costs, and total hospitalization charges were increased only in young adult females. CONCLUSIONS: HH is associated with increased odds of replacement arthroplasty, particularly in the elderly, which can potentially suggest faster arthropathy progression in this age group and should raise awareness in clinicians taking care of patients with HH. Future research should identify factors mediating arthropathy progression in patients with HH.

Acute Pancreatitis in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease and Kidney Transplant Recipients: Results of a US Nationwide Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To study the prevalence, etiology, and outcome of acute pancreatitis (AP) in kidney transplant and stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) populations in comparison to a non-CKD cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, we identified patients with acute pancreatitis as the primary discharge diagnosis, after which propensity scores were used to create 2 cohorts of patients: 1 with CKD (n=13,425) and 1 without CKD (n=13,425). The CKD group was subsequently subdivided into dialysis-independent stage 5 CKD (n=690), dialysis-dependent stage 5 CKD (n=11,415), and kidney transplant recipients (n=1320). Patients younger than 18 years old, those who received a kidney transplant during the incident admission, and pancreas transplant recipients were excluded. RESULTS: The adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of AP were comparable between the no CKD, stage 5 CKD, and kidney transplant populations. Adjusted inpatient mortality was highest in patients with dialysis-dependent stage 5 CKD (OR, 2.72; 95% CI, 2.2-3.3; P<.01), followed by kidney transplant recipients (OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.12-4.51; P=.02), compared to the non-CKD group. Patients with stage 5 CKD experienced higher rates of shock and intensive care unit admission and had more prolonged and costly hospitalizations than the non-CKD group (P<.01 for all). Hypercalcemia was the most common cause of AP in both dialysis-dependent and dialysis-independent patients with stage 5 CKD, while viral and drug-induced pancreatitis were more prevalent in the transplant recipients. CONCLUSION: Despite comparable adjusted prevalence of AP among the stage 5 CKD, transplant, and non-CKD populations, mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization were higher in the patients with stage 5 CKD and transplant recipients. Hypercalcemia is the most common cause of AP in the stage 5 CKD population irrespective of dialysis requirement.

Diagnostic Yield From Screening Asymptomatic Individuals at High Risk for Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There have been few studies of abdominal imaging screening of individuals at high risk for pancreatic cancer (based on family history or genetic variants). We performed a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies to determine the diagnostic yield and outcomes of abdominal imaging screening for asymptomatic individuals at high risk. METHODS: Through a systematic review of multiple electronic databases and conference proceedings through July 2017, we identified prospective cohort studies (>20 patients) of asymptomatic adults determined to be at high-risk of pancreatic cancer (lifetime risk >5%, including specific genetic-associated conditions) who were screened by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect pancreatic lesions. Our primary outcome was identification of high-risk pancreatic lesions (high-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia, high-grade dysplasia, or adenocarcinoma) at initial screening, and overall incidence during follow up. Summary estimates were reported as incidence rates per 100 patient-years. RESULTS: We identified 19 studies comprising 7085 individuals at high risk for pancreatic cancer; of these, 1660 patients were evaluated by EUS and/or MRI. Fifty-nine high-risk lesions were identified (43 adenocarcinomas: 28 during the initial exam and 15 during follow-up surveillance) and 257 patients underwent pancreatic surgery. Based on our meta-analysis, the overall diagnostic yield screening for high-risk pancreatic lesions was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.33-1.14), with moderate heterogeneity among studies. The number needed to screen to identify 1 patient with a high-risk lesion was 135 (95% CI, 88-303). The diagnostic yield was similar for patients with different genetic features that increased risk, and whether patients were screened by EUS or MRI. CONCLUSIONS: Based on meta-analysis, 135 patients at high-risk for pancreatic cancer must be screened to identify 1 patient with a high-risk pancreatic lesion. Further studies are needed to determine whether screening reduces mortality and is cost effectiveness for individuals at high-risk of pancreatic cancer.