Hereditary hemochromatosis is associated with increased use of joint replacement surgery: Results of a nationwide analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) may lead to iron deposition-mediated arthropathy, causing progressive joint degeneration, necessitating replacement arthroplasty. Studies have noted an increased need for replacement arthroplasty in patients with HH. We aimed to compare the use of replacement arthroplasty and inpatient economic burden in patients with and without HH. METHODS: For our retrospective cohort study, we used the 2014 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Patients with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code for HH were included. The primary outcome was use of replacement arthroplasty; secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay, hospital costs, and total hospitalization charges. Multivariate logistic regression yielded confounder-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and means. RESULTS: Of 18,250 patients with HH, 7,483 (41.0%) were women and 1,155 (6.3%) underwent replacement arthroplasty. Mean (SD) age for patients with HH and arthroplasty was 66 (18) years. The percentage of patients with HH who underwent replacement arthroplasty was higher than those without HH (3.4%; P<.01). On multivariate analysis, young-adult females and elderly patients with HH were more likely to undergo replacement arthroplasty compared to those without HH of the corresponding gender and age group. Mean length of stay, hospital costs, and total hospitalization charges were increased only in young adult females. CONCLUSIONS: HH is associated with increased odds of replacement arthroplasty, particularly in the elderly, which can potentially suggest faster arthropathy progression in this age group and should raise awareness in clinicians taking care of patients with HH. Future research should identify factors mediating arthropathy progression in patients with HH.

Diagnostic Yield From Screening Asymptomatic Individuals at High Risk for Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There have been few studies of abdominal imaging screening of individuals at high risk for pancreatic cancer (based on family history or genetic variants). We performed a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies to determine the diagnostic yield and outcomes of abdominal imaging screening for asymptomatic individuals at high risk. METHODS: Through a systematic review of multiple electronic databases and conference proceedings through July 2017, we identified prospective cohort studies (>20 patients) of asymptomatic adults determined to be at high-risk of pancreatic cancer (lifetime risk >5%, including specific genetic-associated conditions) who were screened by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect pancreatic lesions. Our primary outcome was identification of high-risk pancreatic lesions (high-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia, high-grade dysplasia, or adenocarcinoma) at initial screening, and overall incidence during follow up. Summary estimates were reported as incidence rates per 100 patient-years. RESULTS: We identified 19 studies comprising 7085 individuals at high risk for pancreatic cancer; of these, 1660 patients were evaluated by EUS and/or MRI. Fifty-nine high-risk lesions were identified (43 adenocarcinomas: 28 during the initial exam and 15 during follow-up surveillance) and 257 patients underwent pancreatic surgery. Based on our meta-analysis, the overall diagnostic yield screening for high-risk pancreatic lesions was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.33-1.14), with moderate heterogeneity among studies. The number needed to screen to identify 1 patient with a high-risk lesion was 135 (95% CI, 88-303). The diagnostic yield was similar for patients with different genetic features that increased risk, and whether patients were screened by EUS or MRI. CONCLUSIONS: Based on meta-analysis, 135 patients at high-risk for pancreatic cancer must be screened to identify 1 patient with a high-risk pancreatic lesion. Further studies are needed to determine whether screening reduces mortality and is cost effectiveness for individuals at high-risk of pancreatic cancer.