Preventive effects of NSAIDs, NO-NSAIDs, and NSAIDs plus difluoromethylornithine in a chemically induced urinary bladder cancer model.

Urinary bladder cancer prevention studies were performed with the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) naproxen (a standard NSAID with a good cardiovascular profile), sulindac, and their nitric oxide (NO) derivatives. In addition, the effects of the ornithine decarboxylase inhibitor, difluoromethylornithine (DFMO), alone or combined with a suboptimal dose of naproxen or sulindac was examined. Agents were evaluated at their human equivalent doses (HED), as well as at lower doses. In the hydroxybutyl(butyl)nitrosamine (OH-BBN) model of urinary bladder cancer, naproxen (400 or 75 ppm) and sulindac (400 ppm) reduced the incidence of large bladder cancers by 82%, 68%, and 44%, respectively, when the agents were initially given 3 months after the final dose of the carcinogen; microscopic cancers already existed. NO-naproxen was highly effective, whereas NO-sulindac was inactive. To further compare naproxen and NO-naproxen, we examined their effects on gene expression in rat livers following a 7-day exposure. Limited, but similar, gene expression changes in the liver were induced by both agents, implying that the primary effects of both are mediated by the parent NSAID. When agents were initiated 2 weeks after the last administration of OH-BBN, DFMO at 1,000 ppm had limited activity, a low dose of naproxen (75 ppm) and sulindac (150 ppm) were highly and marginally effective. Combining DFMO with suboptimal doses of naproxen had minimal effects, whereas the combination of DMFO and sulindac was more active than either agent alone. Thus, naproxen and NO-naproxen were highly effective, whereas sulindac was moderately effective in the OH-BBN model at their HEDs.

Host-derived osteopontin maintains an acute inflammatory response to suppress early progression of extrinsic cancer cells.

The matricellular protein osteopontin (OPN), expressed in various cancer types and elevated in the blood of cancer patients, is thought to have different functions when derived from host versus cancer cells. To assess the effect of host-derived OPN on growth of cancers of epithelial origin, we established a line of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) cells, named ONSC, which lacks the OPN gene and develops SCC in syngeneic wild-type (WT) and OPN-null mice. At 8 and/or 10 week after subcutaneous injection of ONSC cells in mice, however, there was a lower tumor incidence in WT mice, suggesting that host-derived OPN is associated with suppression of early growth of extrinsic cancer cells. Histological, immunohistochemical, biochemical and hematological analyses were performed on the tumor microenvironment and blood from tumor-bearing mice during the first week after implantation. Host-derived OPN suppression of extrinsic ONSC cell progression is likely mediated through elicitation of an early innate inflammatory response, through its function as a chemoattractant and/or by enhancing survival of inflammatory cells. Further, consistent with a previous report, the serum levels of host-derived OPN, which are elevated during the early phase of tumor growth in mice implanted with ONSC, appear to reflect an anti-tumor progression effect.