Occult nodal metastases in T1-T2cN0 oral squamous cell carcinoma: Correlation between sentinel node positivity and completion neck dissection analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Sentinel node procedure (SN) is a standard procedure that has shown its safety and effectiveness for T1/T2 cN0 oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), with completion neck dissection (CND) for patients with positive SN. The aim of this study was to characterize the nodal involvement in a cohort of SN + OSCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with T1/T2 cN0 OSCC with positive SN with CND were included in this single-center, prospective cohort study between 2000 and 2013. RESULTS: 54/301 patients had at least one positive SN. In 43/54 (80 %) cases, only the SN(s) were invaded; with only one SN involved (SN+=1) in 36/54 (67 %) cases. No predictive factors of nodal involvement in the CND were found considering the followings: SN micro/macrometastases, primary tumor's depth of invasion (DOI), perineural spread, lymphovascular involvement, primary tumor location, T stage and extranodal extension. The SN micrometastatic involvement (n = 22) was significantly associated with only one SN + CND- (p = 0.017). In the group of patients with unique micrometastatic involvement in the SN (n = 20/54), there was a higher isolated nodal recurrence free time (p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: 80% of T1/T2 cN0 OSCC with positive SN had no other lymph node metastases in the CND, questioning the potential benefits of this procedure. Predictive factors such as the size of the SN metastasis need to be tested to stratify the risk of positive non-SN lymph nodes leading to a personalized treatment, lowering the therapeutic morbidity while maintaining the oncologic safety.

Replacement of lip-split mandibulotomy by pull-through approach for T3-4 oral carcinomas.

At the study hospital, the lip-split mandibulotomy (LSM) has progressively been replaced by a pull-through (PT) approach. This study compared the outcomes of the LSM and PT approaches in a series of 192 patients with T3-T4a oral tongue and floor of the mouth squamous cell carcinoma treated over the two last decades. No difference in margin status (P = 0.254), rate of early complications (local infections) (P = 0.867), haematoma/haemorrhage (P = 0.221), delayed wound healing (P = 0.438), re-operation (P = 0.083), or Clavien-Dindo classification (P= 0.5281) was found. The LSM approach was associated with a higher rate of late complications such as pseudarthrosis (14.5% vs 0.9%; OR 17.89, P = 0.0005) and trismus (35% vs 13.8%; OR 3.32, P = 0.025), and a trend towards a higher rate of fistulas (24.6% vs 13.1%; OR 2.16, P = 0.088). The quality of life of long-term survivors (median 132 months) was similar in the two groups, with a mean QLQC30 score of 59.7 (P = 0.099) and mean MDADI score of 57.4 (P = 0.213). The 5-year local control rate was 86.4% in the PT group and 86.2% in the LSM group (P = 0.878), while the 5-year overall survival rates were 50.0% and 48.3%, respectively (P = 0.68). In our experience, replacement of LSM by a PT approach in oral carcinoma was associated with decreased rates of late complications such as pseudarthrosis, fistula, and trismus, without any difference in oncological outcomes.