Systematic review with meta-analysis: neuroimaging in hepatitis C chronic infection.

BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis C is considered a systemic disease because of extra-hepatic manifestations. Neuroimaging has been employed in hepatitis C virus-infected patients to find in vivo evidence of central nervous system alterations. AIMS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of neuroimaging research in chronic hepatitis C treatment naive patients, or patients previously treated without sustained viral response, to study structural and functional brain impact of hepatitis C. METHODS: Using PRISMA guidelines a database search was conducted from inception up until 1 May 2017 for peer-reviewed studies on structural or functional neuroimaging assessment of chronic hepatitis C patients without cirrhosis or encephalopathy, with control group. Meta-analyses were performed when possible. RESULTS: The final sample comprised 25 studies (magnetic resonance spectroscopy [N = 12], perfusion weighted imaging [N = 1], positron emission tomography [N = 3], single-photon emission computed tomography [N = 4], functional connectivity in resting state [N = 1], diffusion tensor imaging [N = 2] and structural magnetic resonance imaging [N = 2]). The whole sample was of 509 chronic hepatitis C patients, with an average age of 41.5 years old and mild liver disease. A meta-analysis of magnetic resonance spectroscopy studies showed increased levels of choline/creatine ratio (mean difference [MD] 0.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.06-0.18), creatine (MD 0.85, 95% CI 0.42-1.27) and glutamate plus glutamine (MD 1.67, 95% CI 0.39-2.96) in basal ganglia and increased levels of choline/creatine ratio in centrum semiovale white matter (MD 0.13, 95% CI 0.07-0.19) in chronic hepatitis C patients compared with healthy controls. Photon emission tomography studies meta-analyses did not find significant differences in PK11195 binding potential in cortical and subcortical regions of chronic hepatitis C patients compared with controls. Correlations were observed between various neuroimaging alterations and neurocognitive impairment, fatigue and depressive symptoms in some studies. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with chronic hepatitis C exhibit cerebral metabolite alterations and structural or functional neuroimaging abnormalities, which sustain the hypothesis of hepatitis C virus involvement in brain disturbances.

Anti-viral therapy can be delayed or avoided in a significant proportion of HBeAg-negative Caucasian patients in the Grey Zone.

BACKGROUND: Grey Zone (GZ) is an ill-defined situation including patients falling between inactive carrier (IC) state and HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B (HBeAg-negative CHB). AIMS: To assess the long-term outcomes of GZ patients compared to IC in the absence of treatment. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 287 IC and GZ HBeAg-negative patients. Patients were classified into 4 groups at baseline: HBV-DNA <2000 IU/mL and ALT <40 U/L (IC), HBV-DNA <2000 IU/mL and ALT 40-80 U/L (GZ-1), HBV-DNA 2000-20 000 IU/mL and ALT <40 U/L (GZ-2) or ALT 40-80 U/L (GZ-3). Data were also analysed using AASLD ALT criteria. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 8.2 (5-19) years, HBsAg loss occurred in about 15% ICs or GZ patients. Transition into IC state occurred in 40% of GZ patients. DNA fluctuations >2000 IU/mL correlated inversely with transition into IC and HBsAg loss. HBsAg levels were significantly lower in ICs than in GZ patients (338 IU/mL [20-3269] vs 5763 IU/mL [2172-17 754]; P < 0.05). Among the latter group, there was an increasing gradient of HBsAg levels from GZ-1 to GZ-3 patients (P < 0.05). HBeAg-negative CHB occurred in only 18 (6.3%) GZ patients. No patient developed cirrhosis nor advanced fibrosis. ALT/HBV-DNA fluctuations and HBeAg-negative CHB development were more frequent in genotype B/C patients, whereas HBsAg loss occurred only in genotype A/D patients. CONCLUSIONS: Most Caucasian GZ patients present excellent long-term outcomes in the absence of treatment, with a high rate of HBsAg loss and low rate of progression to HBeAg-negative CHB. HBV-genotyping and HBsAg levels could help to predict outcomes and better classify GZ patients.

Hepatitis B reactivation in patients with chronic hepatitis C undergoing anti-viral therapy with an interferon-free regimen.

BACKGROUND: A few cases of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation during anti-viral therapy against hepatitis C (HCV) have been reported. However, the information regarding the real impact of this phenomenon is scarce. AIM: To evaluate the risk of HBV reactivation during anti-viral therapy against HCV with an interferon-free regimen with direct-acting anti-virals (DAAs). METHODS: Observational and prospective study of 352 patients receiving DAAs therapy between September 2015 and May 2016. HBV-DNA and ALT levels were monitored at baseline, at week 4 of anti-viral therapy, at end of treatment and 12 weeks after treatment discontinuation in patients with HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) positive or HBV core antibody (anti-HBc) positive before starting anti-viral therapy. RESULTS: Ten (2.8%) and 64 (18%) patients were HBsAg and anti-HBc positive at baseline, respectively. Five (50%) of 10 HBsAg positive and one (1.6%) of 64 anti-HBc positive patients presented HBV virological reactivation (>1log increase in HBV-DNA levels). None of these patients presented clinical reactivation (increase in ALT levels). CONCLUSIONS: HBV virological reactivation is frequent in HBsAg+ patients receiving anti-viral therapy against HCV. However, HBV-DNA elevations were modest (<20 000 IU/mL) and without clinical impact (no ALT elevation).

Predicting the development of liver cirrhosis by simple modelling in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND: Data are scarce on the natural history of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) in patients with mild hepatitis C who did not respond to anti-viral therapy. AIM: To predict the risk of progression to cirrhosis, identifying patients with the more urgent need for therapy with effective anti-virals. METHODS: A cohort of 1289 noncirrhotic CHC patients treated with interferon-based therapy between 1990 and 2004 in two referral hospitals were followed up for a median of 12 years. RESULTS: Overall, SVR was achieved in 46.6% of patients. Data from a randomly split sample (n = 832) was used to estimate a model to predict outcomes. Among nonresponders (n = 444), cirrhosis developed in 123 (28%) patients. In this group, the 3, 5 and 10-year cumulative probabilities of cirrhosis were 4%, 7% and 22%, respectively, compared to <1% in the SVR-group (P < 0.05). Baseline factors independently associated with progression to cirrhosis in nonresponders were: fibrosis ≥F2, age >40 years, AST >100 IU/L, GGT >40 IU/L. Three logistic regression models that combined these simple variables were highly accurate in predicting the individual risk of developing cirrhosis with areas under the receiving operating characteristic curves (AUC) at 5, 7 and 10 years of ~0.80. The reproducibility of the models in the validation cohort (n = 457, nonresponders = 244), was consistently high. CONCLUSIONS: Modelling based on simple laboratory and clinical data can accurately identify the individual risk of progression to cirrhosis in nonresponder patients with chronic hepatitis C, becoming a very helpful tool to prioritise the start of oral anti-viral therapy in clinical practice.

Liver stiffness 1 year after transplantation predicts clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent hepatitis C.

The value of transient elastography (TE) to assess clinical outcomes in hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) has not been explored so far. We studied 144 hepatitis C-infected and 48 non-hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected LT recipients and evaluated the prognostic value of TE 1 year after transplantation to predict clinical decompensations and graft and patient survival. In HCV patients, cumulative probabilities of liver decompensation 5 years after LT were 8% for patients with liver stiffness measurement (LSM) <8.7 kilopascals (kPa) versus 47% for patients with LSM ≥ 8.7 kPa (p<0.001). Five-year graft and patient cumulative survival were 90% and 92% in patients with LSM<8.7 kPa (p<0.001) and 63% and 64% in patients with LSM ≥ 8.7 kPa, respectively (p<0.001). Patients with low LSM 1 year after LT had excellent outcomes independently from receiving antiviral treatment or achieving sustained virological response (SVR). In contrast, graft survival significantly improved in patients with LSM ≥ 8.7 kPa who achieved SVR. No association between outcomes and LSM at 12 months was observed in non-HCV patients. In conclusion, LSM 1 year after LT is a valuable tool to predict hepatitis C-related outcomes in recurrent hepatitis C and can be used in clinical practice to identify the best candidates for antiviral therapy.

[Implantation of a hospital registry of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer]. / Implantación de un registro hospitalario de cáncer colorrectal hereditario sin poliposis.

INTRODUCTION: Identification of patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) can allow colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention through colonoscopy and polypectomies. The purpose of this study was to report the clinical characteristics of HNPCC families in our registry. PATIENTS AND METHOD: HNPCC was identified using the Amsterdam criteria. Familial clustering of CRC and extracolonic cancers were investigated in families. Individuals at risk were offered annual colonoscopy, starting from the age of 25 years. RESULTS: Twelve HNPCC families were identified. There were 46 cases of CRC in 38 patients. The mean age at diagnosis of CRC was 45.4 +/- 12.7 years (range 25-73 years). In patients with documented disease, right-sided tumors predominated. Eleven patients with extracolonic cancer were identified (six tumors located in the endometrium). Of 43 at-risk individuals, 29 accepted surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm the importance of the family history in identifying HNPCC. This study confirms previously described characteristics in HNPCC, namely, early age at onset of CRC, right-sided predominance, multiple synchronous and metachronous neoplasms, and increased extracolonic cancers. This is the first study of clinical data in a Spanish HNPCC registry.

Implantación de un registro hospitalario de cáncer colorrectal hereditario sin poliposis / Implantation of a hospital registry of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer

Introducción: La identificación de los pacientes afectados de cáncer colorrectal hereditario sin poliposis (CCRHSP) hace posible la prevención del cáncer colorrectal (CCR), mediante el cribado endoscópico y las polipectomías endoscópicas. La finalidad de nuestro estudio es presentar los datos clínicos de las familias incluidas en nuestro registro de CCRHSP. Pacientes y método: El CCRHSP se identifica mediante los criterios de Ámsterdam. Se analiza la historia familiar de CCR y de neoplasias extracolónicas. Entre las familias identificadas, a los familiares en situación de riesgo se les ofrece la realización de cribado mediante colonoscopia anual, a partir de los 25 años de edad. Resultados: Se identifica a 12 familias que cumplen los criterios de Ámsterdam. En total se presentan 46 casos de CCR en 38 pacientes. La edad media en el momento del diagnóstico es de 45,4 ± 12,7 años, con un rango de entre 25 y 73 años. Entre los pacientes con histología documentada, predominan las lesiones del colon derecho. Se identifica a 11 pacientes con neoplasias extracolónicas (6 localizadas en el endometrio). En total, 29 de 43 familiares de riesgo aceptaron el cribado endoscópico. Conclusiones: Los datos confirman la importancia de la historia familiar para la identificación del CCRHSP. Este estudio confirma las características previamente descritas para el CCRHSP, como la edad temprana de presentación del CCR, la localización preferente en el colon derecho, la presencia de múltiples lesiones sincrónicas o metacrónicas y el incremento de las neoplasias extracolónicas. Éste es el primer estudio con datos clínicos de un registro de CCRHSP en España

Introduction: Identification of patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) can allow colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention through colonoscopy and polypectomies. The purpose of this study was to report the clinical characteristics of HNPCC families in our registry. Patients and method: HNPCC was identified using the Amsterdam criteria. Familial clustering of CRC and extracolonic cancers were investigated in families. Individuals at risk were offered annual colonoscopy, starting from the age of 25 years. Results: Twelve HNPCC families were identified. There were 46 cases of CRC in 38 patients. The mean age at diagnosis of CRC was 45.4 ± 12.7 years (range 25-73 years). In patients with documented disease, right-sided tumors predominated. Eleven patients with extracolonic cancer were identified (six tumors located in the endometrium). Of 43 at-risk individuals, 29 accepted surveillance. Conclusions: Our data confirm the importance of the family history in identifying HNPCC. This study confirms previously described characteristics in HNPCC, namely, early age at onset of CRC, right-sided predominance, multiple synchronous and metachronous neoplasms, and increased extracolonic cancers. This is the first study of clinical data in a Spanish HNPCC registry