Isradipine in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension in geriatric patients.

A number of studies have shown the benefit of hypertensive treatment even though the most common forms of the disease are mild-to-moderate in severity. Considering the overall aging of the world's population, it is of particular interest to study hypertension and its treatment in geriatric patients. A short-term study of isradipine was conducted to assess its effectiveness and tolerability in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. The study was carried out by general practitioners and involved 3343 patients, aged > or = 18 years, with diastolic blood pressures (DBPs) ranging from 95 to 114 mm Hg. A 4-week wash-out and placebo run-in phase was followed by a 12-week active treatment period with isradipine at 1.25 or 2.5 mg/day, depending on the blood pressure response. Posttreatment results in a subgroup of 1092 patients (444 men and 648 women), aged > or = 60 years, showed decreases in systolic blood pressure (SBP) from 173.1 to 149.2 mm Hg (mean decrease, 20.9 mm Hg) and, in DBP, from 102.0 to 85.0 mm Hg (mean decrease, 16.9 mm Hg). The majority (84.6%) of these patients showed DBP reductions of > 10 mm Hg, and 82.3% achieved normalization (DBP < 90 mm Hg) at the end of treatment. The mean dosage was 1.74 +/- 0.69 mg twice daily, and 37% of patients doubled their initial 1.25 mg twice daily dosages. There were no significant changes in either heart rate or major metabolic parameters. Adverse events were reported by 3.1% of the patients, and 90% of both patients and physicians expressed satisfaction with the therapy. There were no differences between men and women with regard to adverse events or efficacy, nor were the results in patients > or = 60 years different from those in younger patients. Thus, isradipine was effective and well tolerated in these geriatric patients.

Isradipine in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension in Portugal.

A short-term trial of isradipine was conducted to assess its effectiveness and tolerability in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension. The study was carried out by general practitioners and involved 2,702 patients, aged 18-70 years, who had diastolic blood pressures (DBP) of 95-114 mm Hg. Patients completed a pretreatment phase of up to 4 weeks for antihypertensive drug washout and placebo run-in, before entering a 12-week active-treatment phase with 1.25 mg of isradipine twice daily, which was increased after 4 weeks to 2.5 mg twice daily, depending on the blood pressure response. At the end of 12 weeks, the mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) and DBP were 148.1 and 86.7 mm Hg compared with 169.0 and 103.0 mm Hg after placebo, respectively. The majority of patients (89.6%) had a DBP reduction greater than 10 mm Hg, and 86.2% had normalized DBP (less than or equal to 90 mm Hg) at the end of treatment. Adverse events were reported by 2.8% of patients, and 90% of patients and general practitioners reported satisfaction with the treatment. Thus, our results indicate that isradipine is effective and well tolerated, and may deserve a place as first-line treatment in mild-to-moderate hypertension.

First clinical experience with isradipine in the treatment of hypertension in Portugal.

The efficacy and safety of isradipine and nifedipine retard were compared in 51 patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. A 4-week placebo run-in period was followed by an 8-week course of treatment. Patients were randomly allocated to either isradipine 1.25 mg twice daily (n = 24) or nifedipine 20 mg twice daily (n = 826); dosages were doubled if blood pressure was not normalized [diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 90 mm Hg) after 4 weeks of active treatment. Systolic/diastolic blood pressures were significantly reduced (p less than 0.01/p less than 0.01) by isradipine from 162/103 to 145/89 mm Hg, and by nifedipine from 162/104 to 143/88 mm Hg. Normalization rates were 79% with isradipine and 67% with nifedipine. It was necessary to double the dosage in seven of the patients taking isradipine and in three of those taking nifedipine; the mean final dosages were 1.63 mg and 22.4 mg twice daily, respectively. Heart rate did not change significantly with either treatment. There were drug-related adverse events in five patients (21%) taking isradipine (2 edema, 2 headache, 2 palpitations, 1 flushing) and in eight (30%) of those taking nifedipine (5 edema, 2 headache, 1 palpitations). Therapy was withdrawn in one patient in the isradipine group (1 headache) and two patients in the nifedipine group (1 edema, 1 headache). We conclude that isradipine is a highly effective and well tolerated antihypertensive agent.