Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Acta Neurochir Suppl ; 130: 13-18, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37548718

ABSTRACT

Complications are not uncommon in the complex field of skull base surgery. The intrinsic relationship of lesions in this region to important neurovascular structures, dura mater, and bone may lead to significant morbidity and mortality. The evolution of endoscopic endonasal surgery has had a significant impact on this field as a less invasive option for treatment of selected lesions, but major morbidity may still occur; moreover, endoscopic approaches have been associated with higher rates of some specific complications, such as cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Based on a presented case report, the authors discuss the management of various complications associated with different approaches for resection of skull base malignancies, including epidural and intradural pneumocephalus, subdural hematoma, and subdural empyema. Important lessons learned by the senior author throughout more than 30 years of his skull base surgery practice are highlighted. The inherent risk of complications in skull base surgery emphasizes the importance of their avoidance, prevention, and learning from one's unfavorable experience so as not to repeat them.


Subject(s)
Neurosurgical Procedures , Skull Base , Humans , Skull Base/surgery , Neurosurgical Procedures/adverse effects , Nose/surgery , Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak/etiology , Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak/surgery , Endoscopy/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology
2.
Neurosurg Clin N Am ; 30(4): 433-444, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31471050

ABSTRACT

Giant adenomas represent a significant surgical challenge. Although traditionally several transcranial and transsphenoidal microscopic approaches have had a central role in their management, in the last 2 decades here have been increasing reports of the endoscopic endonasal approach for giant adenomas, citing its improved resection rates and lower complication profile. However, its role as the preferred approach has not been fully established and there is currently a paucity of evidence-based recommendations available in the literature. This article reviews the current literature and attempts to define the role and outcomes of the endoscopic endonasal surgical approach for giant pituitary adenomas.


Subject(s)
Adenoma/surgery , Neuroendoscopy/methods , Pituitary Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery , Sphenoid Bone/surgery , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base ; 79(2): S201-S202, 2018 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29404251

ABSTRACT

Objectives Extended endoscopic approaches are useful for resection of selected craniopharyngiomas. Midline, extraventricular, and predominantly cystic lesions are good candidates for endoscopic resection. In this video, we demonstrate the endoscopic endonasal resection of a large suprasellar craniopharyngioma and discuss the nuances of the surgical technique. Design/Setting Surgical video of an extended endoscopic approach for resection of a suprasellar craniopharyngioma. Results We report the case of a 56-year-old woman who presented with bitemporal hemianopsia and visual acuity deterioration secondary to a large suprasellar solid-cystic lesion. The patient underwent an extended endoscopic transtuberculum approach for resection of the lesion, which was diagnosed as a papillary craniopharyngioma. This video discusses the anatomy and surgical technique applied for endoscopic resection of such lesions. Conclusion Endoscopic endonasal surgery is a useful technique for management of craniopharyngiomas. It is associated with good clinical outcomes in selected cases. Complications, such as postoperative CSF leak, may occur and should be carefully managed. The link to the video can be found at: https://youtu.be/EneOCiQE7yo .

4.
World Neurosurg ; 109: e845-e852, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29107723

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids are routinely used to treat brain tumors. Although steroids have an immediate clinical benefit, their use can lead to a number of relevant complications, and a negative association with overall survival has been shown in glioblastoma (GBM) patients. There is no evidence in the literature regarding the ideal dose. We assessed the use of steroids in patients with GBM after resection surgery. METHODS: This is a cohort study of 131 newly diagnosed GBM patients that underwent tumor resection surgery. Dose of steroids was as low as possible, without a formal guideline. Fifteen patients were lost at baseline (retention rate, 88.5%). Our population for analysis included 114 patients that were still at risk of death at a landmark time point 2 months after surgery. RESULTS: Within 1 month of surgery, 93.9% of patients came off steroids, and 84.7% came off steroids before 2 weeks. One month after radiotherapy, 86 (75.4%) patients remained steroid-free and 28 (24.6%) were steroid-dependent. During 2235 person-months of follow-up, we documented 101 incident deaths. After adjusting for age, sex, Karnofsky Performance Scale score, MGMT promoter methylation, and extent of tumor resection, and time to surgery, the hazard ratio for the steroid-free group of patients was 0.46 (95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.77) compared with steroid-dependent patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence for an inverse association between the lack of steroid dependency and mortality risk in patients whose steroid dosage was rapidly tapered after surgery. After resection, most patients can stop steroids within 2 weeks and finish radiotherapy without steroids.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Glioblastoma/surgery , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Postoperative Care/methods , Aged , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Karnofsky Performance Status , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Proportional Hazards Models , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Time Factors
5.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 154(11): 1997-2002; discussion 2002, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22930281

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The meaning of the ventricular wall fluorescence during 5-aminolevulinic (5-ALA)-guided surgery in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) is still unknown. The authors studied the association between ventricle fluorescence, clinical outcome and survival, and described the histopathological findings of selective biopsies from the ventricular wall. METHODS: One hundred and forty patients diagnosed of GBM underwent fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS); 65 of them were naive GBM and ventricle fluorescence during surgery was annotated prospectively. Selective biopsies were collected from the ventricular wall when possible. Clinical and radiological data were registered, including age, Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score, presence of hydrocephalus, overall survival (OS), tumour volume and location (periventricular vs non-periventricular) and leptomeningeal dissemination. RESULTS: During FGS the ventricle wall was opened just when the tumour was periventricular in the preoperative MRI (45 out of 65). In 28 of them (60 %) the fluorescence extended far away from the site of opening, while in 17 it ended just in the few millimetres around the tumour. All four patients who developed hydrocephalus had periventricular tumours and the ventricle wall had been opened during surgery. Statistically significant differences were seen in OS according to periventricular location (15 m vs 33 m, P = 0.008 log rank). However, there was not significant relationship between ventricle fluorescence and hydrocephalus (P = 0.75), nor survival (14 m vs 15.5 m, P = 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative MRI predicts if the ventricle will be opened using the 5-ALA fluorescence, according to tumour location. It does not predict, however if the ventricle wall is going to be fluorescent or not. The fluorescence of the ventricle wall is not a predictor for complications or survival. Periventricular tumour location is an independent bad prognostic factor in GBM.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Cerebral Ventricles/pathology , Glioblastoma/surgery , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Photosensitizing Agents , Adult , Aged , Aminolevulinic Acid , Brain Neoplasms/complications , Brain Neoplasms/diagnosis , Brain Neoplasms/mortality , Cerebral Ventricles/surgery , Female , Glioblastoma/complications , Glioblastoma/diagnosis , Glioblastoma/mortality , Humans , Hydrocephalus/etiology , Hydrocephalus/pathology , Hydrocephalus/surgery , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...