Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol ; 47(3): 156-160, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28705527

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Our health system orders a high number of STAT priority portable chest radiographs (62%) compared to Routine (35%) and Today (3%). Retrospective chart review of 1000 chest radiographs ordered with the STAT priority revealed that 38% of studies did not indicate clinical urgency. Given the high number or STAT priority portable chest radiographs ordered, prioritizing acquisition and interpretation of true STATs has become challenging for technologists and radiologists, leading to process inefficiencies, long turnaround times (TATs), communication failures, and patient-safety errors. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team analyzed the current pathway for exam order to finalized report, identified failure modes of imaging order to completion process, and developed guidelines for what constitutes a true STAT examination. A new "urgent" order category meeting the definition of true STAT was designed, tested, and implemented over a 9-month period in participating intensive care units RESULTS: Since study implementation, 108 "urgent" examinations were ordered. Median TAT for a STAT examination from order entry to image acquisition dropped from 70 minutes preimplementation to 16 minutes for "urgent" examinations. Median TAT for exam completion to radiologist image interpretation dropped from 520 minutes preimplementation to 14 minutes for "urgent" examinations. Since implementation, "urgent" examinations were found to be more concordant (70%) with the status of a critically ill patient than STAT examinations (62%). CONCLUSIONS: The complexity of large multispecialty medical centers and lack of direct interaction of the radiologist with clinicians has led to underappreciation of the needs of ordering providers by radiology, and elucidated system limitations of radiology by ordering providers. By involving a team of frontline clinicians, our team standardized the process of identifying, ordering, procuring, interpreting, and communicating results of true STAT examinations. The process created by our team now serves as a template for implementation in other locations and service lines of our hospital.


Subject(s)
Efficiency, Organizational , Emergencies , Point-of-Care Systems , Radiography, Thoracic/instrumentation , Humans , Medical Order Entry Systems , Pilot Projects , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Workload/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...