Population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response analyses from ALTA-1L: Model-based analyses supporting the brigatinib dose in ALK-positive NSCLC.

The ALK in Lung Cancer Trial of brigAtinib in First Line (ALTA-1L) compared brigatinib versus crizotinib in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor-naive patients with ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was used to estimate brigatinib exposures for exposure-efficacy and exposure-safety analyses in ALTA-1L. A previously developed population PK model for brigatinib was applied to estimate brigatinib PK parameters. Relationships between static (time-independent) and dynamic (time-varying) exposure metrics and efficacy (progression-free survival [PFS], objective response rate [ORR], and intracranial ORR [iORR]) and safety outcomes (selected grade ≥2 and grade ≥3 adverse events [AEs]) were evaluated using logistic regression and time-to-event analyses. There were no meaningful differences in brigatinib PK in the first-line and second-line settings, supporting use of the previous population PK model for the first-line population. Exposure-response analyses showed no significant effect of time-varying brigatinib exposure on PFS. Brigatinib exposure was not significantly related to ORR, but higher exposure was associated with higher iORR (odds ratio: 1.13, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.28, p = 0.049). Across the observed median exposure (5th-95th percentile) at steady state for 180 mg once daily, the predicted probability of iORR was 0.83 (0.58-0.99). AEs significantly associated with higher exposure were elevated lipase (grade ≥3) and amylase (grade ≥2). Time to first brigatinib dose reduction was not related to exposure. These results support the benefit-risk profile of first-line brigatinib 180 mg once daily (7-day lead-in dose at 90 mg once daily) in patients with ALK+ NSCLC.

Characterizing Effects of Antidiabetic Drugs on Heart Rate, Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure.

A model-based meta-analysis was performed with reported data from obese subjects and patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) to characterize the effects of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors, gastric inhibitory polypeptides (GIPs), glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP1), and dual GIP/GLP1 agonists, or a combination of these antidiabetic drugs (ADs) on heart rate (HR), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and systolic blood pressure (SBP). A systematic literature search and review after the Cochrane method identified sources for investigational and approved ADs resulted in a comprehensive database with data from 178 clinical studies in obese subjects and patients with T2DM. Results indicated that there were AD class-dependent effects on HR and SBP, whereas no clear AD-related effects on DBP were found. All AD classes, except for DPP4 inhibitors, increased HR. The largest increase of 12 bpm was seen with GLP1 receptor agonists. All AD classes appeared to decrease SBP. DPP4 inhibitors were associated with a marginal decrease of ~ 1 mmHg, whereas GLP1 and GIP/GLP1 dual agonists exhibited the largest decrease of ~ 3 mmHg in SBP. AD-related effects were similar in obese subjects and patients with T2DM. In conclusion, there are clinically relevant AD-related effects on both HR and SBP, but not on DBP. DPP4 inhibitors are associated with the smallest (if at all) effects on HR and SBP, whereas GLP1 inhibitors exhibited the largest effects on these two cardiovascular end points. Additional studies are warranted to further investigate how AD-related SBP decreases combined with HR increases affect long-term cardiovascular mortality.

Establishing anchor-based minimally important differences (MID) with the EORTC quality-of-life measures: a meta-analysis protocol.

INTRODUCTION: As patient assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in cancer clinical trials has increased over the years, so has the need to attach meaningful interpretations to differences in HRQOL scores between groups and changes within groups. Determining what represents a minimally important difference (MID) in HRQOL scores is useful to clinicians, patients and researchers, and can be used as a benchmark for assessing the success of a healthcare intervention. Our objective is to provide an evidence-based protocol to determine MIDs for the European Organisation for Research and Treatment for Cancer Quality of life Questionnaire core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). We will mainly focus on MID estimation for group-level comparisons. Responder thresholds for individual-level change will also be estimated. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Data will be derived from published phase II and III EORTC trials that used the QLQ-C30 instrument, covering several cancer sites. We will use individual patient data to estimate MIDs for different cancer sites separately. Focus is on anchor-based methods. Anchors will be selected per disease site from available data. A disease-oriented and methodological panel will provide independent guidance on anchor selection. We aim to construct multiple clinical anchors per QLQ-C30 scale and also to compare with several anchor-based methods. The effects of covariates, for example, gender, age, disease stage and so on, will also be investigated. We will examine how our estimated MIDs compare with previously published guidelines, hence further contributing to robust MID guidelines for the EORTC QLQ-C30. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All patient data originate from completed clinical trials with mandatory written informed consent, approved by local ethical committees. Our findings will be presented at scientific conferences, disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and also compiled in a MID 'blue book' which will be made available online on the EORTC Quality of Life Group website as a free guideline document.

Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response of osimertinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

AIMS: To develop a population (pop) pharmacokinetic (PK) model for osimertinib (AZD9291) and its metabolite (AZ5104) and investigate the exposure-response relationships for selected efficacy and safety parameters. METHODS: PK, safety and efficacy data were collected from two non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient studies (n = 748) and one healthy volunteer study (n = 32), after single or multiple once-daily dosing of 20-240 mg osimertinib. Nonlinear mixed effects modelling was used to characterise the popPK. Individual exposure values were used to investigate the relationship with response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST 1.1) efficacy parameters and key safety parameters (rash, diarrhoea, QTcF). RESULTS: A popPK model that adequately described osimertinib and its metabolite AZ5104 in a joint manner was developed. Body weight, serum albumin and ethnicity were identified as significant covariates on PK in the analysis, but were not found to have a clinically relevant impact on osimertinib exposure. No relationship was identified between exposure and efficacy over the dose range studied. A linear relationship was observed between exposure and the occurrence of rash or diarrhoea, and between concentration and QTcF, with a predicted mean (upper 90% confidence interval) increase of 14.2 (15.8) ms at the maximum concentration for an 80 mg once-daily dose at steady state. CONCLUSIONS: PopPK and exposure-response models were developed for osimertinib and AZ5104. There was no relationship between exposure and efficacy but a linear relationship between exposure and safety endpoints (rash, diarrhoea and QTcF) was observed.

The effects of age on health-related quality of life in cancer populations: A pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 involving 6024 cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Cancer incidence increases exponentially with advancing age, cancer patients live longer than in the past, and many new treatments focus on stabilizing disease and HRQOL. The objective of this study is to examine how cancer affects patients' HRQOL and whether their HRQOL is age-dependent. METHODS: Data from 25 EORTC randomized controlled trials was pooled. EORTC QLQ-C30 mean scores for the cancer cohort and five general population cohorts were compared to assess the impact of cancer on patients' HRQOL. Within the cancer cohort, multiple linear regressions (two-sided level P-value = 0.05 adjusted for multiple testing.) were used to investigate the association between age and HRQOL, adjusted for gender, WHO performance status (PS), distant metastasis and stratified by cancer site. A difference of 10 points on the 0-100 scale was considered clinically important. RESULTS: Cancer patients generally have worse HRQOL compared to the general population, but the specific HRQOL domains impaired vary with age. When comparing the cancer versus the general population, young cancer patients had worse financial problems, social and role functioning, while the older cancer groups had more appetite loss. Within the cancer cohort, HRQOL was worse with increasing age for physical functioning and constipation, and better with increasing age for social functioning, insomnia and financial problems (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: HRQOL is impaired in cancer patients compared to the general population, but the impact on specific HRQOL domains varies by age. Within the cancer population, some HRQOL components improve with age while others deteriorate. Optimal care for older cancer patients should target HRQOL domains most relevant to this population.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of fostamatinib efficacy on ACR20 to support dose selection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

R788 (fostamatinib) is an oral prodrug that is rapidly converted into a relatively selective spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) inhibitor R406, evaluated for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This analysis aimed at developing a pharmacodynamic model for efficacy using pooled ACR20 data from two phase II studies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (TASKi1 and TASKi2), describing the effect of fostamatinib as a function of fostamatinib exposure (dose, R406 plasma concentration) and other explanatory variables. The exposure-response relationship of fostamatinib was implemented into a continuous time Markov model describing the time course of transition probabilities between the three possible states of ACR20 non-responder, responder, and dropout at each visit. The probability of transition to the ACR20 response state was linearly (at the rate constant level) related to average R406 plasma concentrations and the onset of this drug effect was fast. Further, increases of fostamatinib dose resulted in increased dropout and subsequent loss of efficacy. This analysis provided an increased understanding of the exposure-response relationship, and provided support for fostamatinib 100 mg BID an appropriate dose regimen for further clinical evaluation.

A global analysis of multitrial data investigating quality of life and symptoms as prognostic factors for survival in different tumor sites.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to examine the prognostic value of baseline health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for survival with regard to different cancer sites using 1 standardized and validated patient self-assessment tool. METHODS: In total, 11 different cancer sites pooled from 30 European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) randomized controlled trials were selected for this study. For each cancer site, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to assess the prognostic value (P< .05) of 15 HRQOL parameters using the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30). Models were adjusted for age, sex, and World Health Organization performance status and were stratified by distant metastasis. RESULTS: In total, 7417 patients completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 before randomization. In brain cancer, cognitive functioning was predictive for survival; in breast cancer, physical functioning, emotional functioning, global health status, and nausea and vomiting were predictive for survival; in colorectal cancer, physical functioning, nausea and vomiting, pain, and appetite loss were predictive for survival; in esophageal cancer, physical functioning and social functioning were predictive for survival; in head and neck cancer, emotional functioning, nausea and vomiting, and dyspnea were predictive for survival; in lung cancer, physical functioning and pain were predictive for survival; in melanoma, physical functioning was predictive for survival; in ovarian cancer, nausea and vomiting were predictive for survival; in pancreatic cancer, global health status was predictive for survival; in prostate cancer, role functioning and appetite loss were predictive for survival; and, in testis cancer, role functioning was predictive for survival. CONCLUSIONS: The current results demonstrated that, for each cancer site, at least 1 HRQOL domain provided prognostic information that was additive over and above clinical and sociodemographic variables.

Patient self-reports of symptoms and clinician ratings as predictors of overall cancer survival.

BACKGROUND: The National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) reporting system is widely used by clinicians to measure patient symptoms in clinical trials. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer's Quality of Life core questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) enables cancer patients to rate their symptoms related to their quality of life. We examined the extent to which patient and clinician symptom scoring and their agreement could contribute to the estimation of overall survival among cancer patients. METHODS: We analyzed baseline data regarding six cancer symptoms (pain, fatigue, vomiting, nausea, diarrhea, and constipation) from a total of 2279 cancer patients from 14 closed EORTC randomized controlled trials. In each trial that was selected for retrospective pooled analysis, both clinician and patient symptom scoring were reported simultaneously at study entry. We assessed the extent of agreement between clinician vs patient symptom scoring using the Spearman and kappa correlation statistics. After adjusting for age, sex, performance status, cancer severity, and cancer site, we used Harrell concordance index (C-index) to compare the potential for clinician-reported and/or patient-reported symptom scores to improve the accuracy of Cox models to predict overall survival. All P values are from two-sided tests. RESULTS: Patient-reported scores for some symptoms, particularly fatigue, did differ from clinician-reported scores. For each of the six symptoms that we assessed at baseline, both clinician and patient scorings contributed independently and positively to the predictive accuracy of survival prognostication. Cox models of overall survival that considered both patient and clinician scores gained more predictive accuracy than models that considered clinician scores alone for each of four symptoms: fatigue (C-index = .67 with both patient and clinician data vs C-index = .63 with clinician data only; P <.001), vomiting (C-index = .64 vs .62; P = .01), nausea (C-index = .65 vs .62; P < .001), and constipation (C-index = .62 vs .61; P = .01). CONCLUSION: Patients provide a subjective measure of symptom severity that complements clinician scoring in predicting overall survival.

Examining the relationships among health-related quality-of-life indicators in cancer patients participating in clinical trials: a pooled study of baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 data.

AIMS: Cancer patients experience multiple and concurrent health-related problems and symptoms due to their illness and therapies. The first objective of this analysis was to identify how health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) indicators cluster among cancer patients and how possible clusters change across patients with different sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. The second objective of this study was to identify which HRQoL indicators are linked to patients' perception of overall quality of life. METHODS: Retrospective pooling of 30 closed randomized European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) clinical trials yielded baseline EORTC Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) HRQoL data for a total of 7417 patients. A cluster analysis was performed to determine how the 15 HRQoL indicators obtained with the QLQ-C30 cluster overall and by patient characteristics. RESULTS: Three main clusters emerged from the overall dataset: a physical cluster, a psychological cluster and a gastrointestinal cluster. The same clusters were found in subgroups defined according to sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, while some differences emerged among cancer sites. The Global Health scale was found to be part of the physical cluster in the overall dataset. This result was consistent across different levels of disease severity, while divergent results were seen across some cancer sites. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that HRQoL indicators are interrelated. Understanding these relationships may aid clinicians in managing the symptom burden experienced by patients, as well as policy-makers, in defining psychosocial support plans.

Minimal important differences for interpreting health-related quality of life scores from the EORTC QLQ-C30 in lung cancer patients participating in randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the smallest changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores in a subset of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) scales, which could be considered as clinically meaningful in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: WHO performance status (PS) and weight change were used as clinical anchors to determine minimal important differences (MIDs) in HRQOL change scores (range, 0-100) in the EORTC QLQ-C30 scales. Selected distribution-based methods were used for comparison. FINDINGS: In a pooled dataset of 812 NSCLC patients undergoing treatment, the values determined to represent the MID depended on whether patients were improving or deteriorating. MID estimates for improvement (based on a one-category change in PS, 5 - <20% weight gain) were physical functioning (9, 5); role functioning (14, 7); social functioning (5, 7); global health status (9, 4); fatigue (14, 5); and pain (16, 2). The respective MID estimates for deterioration (based on PS, weight loss) were physical (4, 6); role (5, 5); social (7, 9); global health status (4, 4); fatigue (6, 11); and pain (3, 7). INTERPRETATION: Based on the selected QLQ-C30 scales, the MID may depend upon whether the patients' PS is improving or worsening, but our results are not definitive. The MID estimates for the specified scales can help clinicians and researchers evaluate the significance of changes in HRQOL and assess the value of a health care intervention or compare treatments. The estimates also can be useful in determining sample sizes in the design of future clinical trials.

Application of penalized splines in analyzing neuronal data.

Neuron experiments produce high-dimensional data structures. Therefore, application of smoothing techniques in the analysis of neuronal data from electrophysiological experiments has received considerable attention of late. We investigate the use of penalized splines in the analysis of neuronal data. This is first illustrated when interested in the temporal trend of a single neuron. An approach to investigate the maximal firing rate, based on the penalizedspline model is proposed. Determination of the time of maximal firing rate is based on non-linear optimization of the objective function with the corresponding confidence intervals constructed based on the first-order derivative function. To distinguish between the curves from different experimental conditions in a moment-by-moment sense, bias adjusted simulation-based simultaneous confidence bands leading to global inference in the time domain are constructed. The bands are an extension of the approach proposed by Ruppert et al. (2003). These methods are in a second step extended towards the analysis of a population of neurons via a marginal or population-averaged model.

Investigating association between behavior, corticosterone, heart rate, and blood pressure in rats using surrogate marker evaluation methodology.

The drug development process involves identifying a compound and assessing its merit through rigorous pre-clinical and clinical trials. The pre-clinical stage is designed to assess the chemical properties of the new drug, as well as to determine the steps for synthesis and purification. In this stage of drug development, circumstances might dictate the use of alternative endpoints than the originally anticipated clinically relevant endpoint. In this regard, identification and evaluation of surrogate endpoints is of paramount importance. The validation methods make it possible to quantify degrees of association between the clinically relevant endpoint, also termed the true endpoint, and the alternative, surrogate endpoint. In this paper, we adapt the surrogate marker evaluation methodology of Alonso et al. (2003); (2006), developed for the case of two longitudinal outcomes, to the situation where either a longitudinal surrogate and cross sectional true endpoint is recorded, or vice versa. The work is motivated by a preclinical experiment conducted to assess association between corticosterone (CORT), heart rate, and blood pressure in rats, the data from which are then subjected to analysis. It was found that there is a weak relationship between CORT and behavior, and between CORT on the one hand and heart rate and blood pressure on the other hand, but a reasonably high degree of association was registered between heart rate and behavior.

Application of semiparametric mixed models and simultaneous confidence bands in a cardiovascular safety experiment with longitudinal data.

Several pharmacological studies involve experiments aimed at testing for a difference between experimental groups wherein the data are longitudinal in nature, frequently with long sequences per subject. Oftentimes, treatment effect, if present, is not constant over time. In such situations, imposing a parametric mean structure can be too complicated and/or restrictive. A more flexible approach is to model the mean using a semiparametric smooth function, estimated using, for example, penalized smoothing splines. We formulate a series of models exhibiting how the group-specific mean profiles could possibly differ. Once an appropriate model is chosen, interest lies in identifying specific time points where the groups differ. For this purpose, we propose the use of simultaneous confidence bands around the fitted models wherein the bands take into account within and between-subject variability, as well as variability arising from smoothing.

Analysis of cross-over designs with serial correlation within periods using semi-parametric mixed models.

The use of semi-parametric mixed models has proven useful in a wide variety of settings. Here, we focus on the application of the methodology in the particular case of a cross-over design with relatively long sequences of repeated measurements within each treatment period and for each subject. Other than an overall measure of the difference between each one of the experimental groups and the control group, specific time point comparisons may also be of interest. To that effect, we propose the use of flexible semi-parametric mixed models, enabling the construction of simulation-based simultaneous confidence bands. The bands take into account both between- and within-subject variabilities, while simultaneously correcting for multiple time point comparisons. Owing to the relatively long sequences of measurements per subject, the presence of serially correlated errors is anticipated and investigated. We illustrate how several formulations of semi-parametric mixed models can be fitted and the construction of simulation-based simultaneous confidence bands using SAS PROC MIXED.

Changes in expression of fibrotic markers and histopathological alterations in kidneys of mice chronically exposed to low and high Cd doses.

The main target organ for cadmium (Cd) is the kidney, and more specifically the proximal tubular cells. Little is known about the effects of a long-term Cd exposure on the ultrastructure of the kidney and the involvement in tubulointerstitial fibrosis. Therefore, mice were exposed to Cd concentrations varying from 10 to 500 mg CdCl(2)/l in the drinking water during 4, 16 and 23 weeks. Ultrastructural changes were studied by means of light- and electron microscopical analyses. Furthermore, the expression of the extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins collagen I and fibronectin, and the myofibroblast/epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) marker alfa-smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA) were studied by means of immunohistochemistry. The histopathological changes caused by Cd varied considerably from one animal to another, and from one individual cell to another. An exposure to Cd concentrations up to 100mg CdCl(2)/l elicited only minor changes that were restricted to increasing amounts of lysosomes and vacuolisation. When higher Cd concentrations were applied, the changes became more pronounced and featured mitochondrial damage, cellular swelling and loss of basal invaginations. An overproduction of the interstitial matrix component fibronectin and the expression of the myofibroblasts/EMT marker alpha-SMA in kidneys of mice exposed to 100mg CdCl(2)/l clearly indicated that an exposure to relatively low Cd doses might lead ultimately to renal fibrosis. Increasing the Cd dose (up to 500 mg CdCl(2)/l) evoked an increased immunoreactivity for fibrotic markers. In conclusion we may state that concentrations up to 100mg CdCl(2)/l evoked minor changes, although the expression of fibrotic markers was increased. Changes became more pronounced when exposing to higher Cd concentrations.

Low cadmium exposure triggers a biphasic oxidative stress response in mice kidneys.

Oxidative stress is believed to participate in the early processes of cadmium (Cd)-induced proximal tubular kidney damage. Mice were chronically exposed up to 23 weeks to low Cd concentrations (10 and 100 mg CdCl(2)/l) via the drinking water. Pro- and antioxidant gene expression levels, glutathione, ascorbate and lipid peroxidation levels were measured. Our study provided evidence for an early and a late stress response in the kidney. Metallothioneins were upregulated from 1 week of exposure on and they stayed important during the whole exposure period. After 8 weeks the expression of Bcl2 (anti-apoptotic), Prdx2 and cytosolic superoxide dismutase (Sod1) was reduced in the group exposed to 100 mg CdCl(2)/l, which might indicate a response to Cd-stress. However glutathione, ascorbate and lipid peroxidation levels did not significantly change, and the overall redox balance remained stable. Stable Sod2 transcriptional levels suggested that an increased formation of superoxide anions, which can arise upon Cd-induced mitochondrial free radical generation, was not appearing. A second defence activation was observed after 23 weeks: i.e. an increase of catalase (Cat), glutathione peroxidase 4 (Gpx4) and heme oxygenase 1 (Hmox1), together with NADPH oxidase 4 (Nox4), of which the role has not been studied yet in Cd nephrotoxicity. These findings were in contrast with previous studies, where Cd-induced oxidative stress was detrimental when high Cd concentrations were applied. In conclusion our study provided evidence that a chronic exposure to low Cd concentrations triggered a biphasic defence activation in the kidney that might lead to adaptation and survival.

Chronic exposure of mice to environmentally relevant, low doses of cadmium leads to early renal damage, not predicted by blood or urine cadmium levels.

Mice were exposed to cadmium (Cd) concentrations ranging from 0 to 100mg CdCl(2)/l in the drinking water for 1, 4, 8, 16 and 23 weeks. Urine samples were taken regularly, Cd content was determined in blood, liver, kidney and urine and histological analyses of the kidney were performed. Kidney cortex Cd content increased linearly with time and dose, while blood levels reached a plateau at 8 weeks and liver at 16 weeks in mice exposed to 100mg CdCl(2)/l after which both started to decrease. Urinary Cd levels were not correlated with the kidney Cd content. A multivariate regression model taking into account the actual Cd intake, calculated from the volume of water taken in by each animal and the exposure concentration, confirmed that blood is an indicator of acute exposure, while kidney Cd content is a reliable indicator of chronic exposure. The urinary protein content was significantly increased from 16 weeks on in mice exposed to 100mg CdCl(2)/l (p<0.05), while other signs of proximal tubular damage (glucosuria, enzymuria) were not detected. Histologically more vacuoles and lysosomes were present in the proximal tubule cells with increasing time and dose. The results indicate that chronic exposure to low doses of Cd induced functional and histological signs of early damage at concentrations in or below the ones generally accepted as safe. Our study does not corroborate the statement that urine Cd levels are a reliable indicator of total Cd body burden, at least when the body burden is low.