Spironolactone reduces oxidative stress in living donor kidney transplantation: a randomized controlled trial.

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonism prevents acute kidney injury induced by ischemia-reperfusion in rodent and pig preclinical models. In a pilot study, we showed that spironolactone (25 mg) reduced oxidative stress after 5 days of kidney transplant (KT). In the present study, we investigated the effects of higher doses (50 and 100 mg) of spironolactone on kidney function, tubular injury markers, and oxidative stress in living donor KT recipients. We included KT recipients aged 18 yr or older who received immunosuppression therapy with IL-2 receptor antagonist, mycophenolate mofetil, corticosteroids, and tacrolimus with negative cross-match, and compatible blood group. Patients were randomized to receive placebo (n = 27), spironolactone (50 mg, n = 25), or spironolactone (100 mg, n = 25). Treatment was given from 3 days before and up to 5 days after KT. Serum creatinine, K+, urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin-2, heat shock protein 72, and 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine levels were assessed. As expected, kidney function was improved after KT. Serum K+ remained in the normal range along the study. There was no significant effect of spironolactone on urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin-2 levels, whereas the increase in urinary heat shock protein 72 levels tended to be less intense in the 100 mg spironolactone-treated group (P = 0.054). In the placebo-treated group, urinary 8-hydroxylated-guanosine levels increased on days 3 and 5 after transplantation. This effect was prevented in patients that received spironolactone. In conclusion, spironolactone reduces the acute increase in urinary oxidative stress in living donor KT recipients.

Graft immunologic events in deceased donor kidney transplant recipients with preformed HLA-donor specific antibodies.

INTRODUCTION: Pretransplant donor-specific HLA alloantibodies detected with the Single Antigen Bead (SAB) assay reflect an increased risk for acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). We herein report the incidence of both acute AMR and acute cellular rejection (ACR) during the first year posttransplantation, in a cohort of kidney transplant recipients (KTR) of deceased donor (DD) grafts, according to their DSA status. Pretransplant DSA do not preclude DD-KT in negative CDC-XM recipients at our center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 246 KT were performed at our center between 01/2012 and 12/2015 and 100 KTR obtained from a DD were analyzed; 24% harbored DSA by SAB assay, MFI values >500 were considered positive. All recipients received thymoglobulin induction and generic tacrolimus-based maintenance therapy. Graft biopsies were performed by protocol on months 3 and 12 as well as per indication. The incidence of AMR and ACR was correlated with the existence of pretransplant DSA. RESULTS: Overall, 34% of patients developed an acute rejection episode, 54.2% in the DSA group versus 27.6% in the non-DSA group (p=0.032), and most of these events were detected as subclinical conditions in protocol biopsies. AMR events developed in 33.3% and 19.7% (p=0.176) in the DSA and the non-DSA groups, respectively. ACR events were found in 16.6% and 6.6% (p=0.127) in the DSA and non-DSA groups, respectively. Graft function was similar between groups at the end of the 1st year posttransplant and no immunological graft loss occurred. CONCLUSION: Despite the use of depleting induction therapy and adequate tacrolimus trough levels along with MMF and steroids, a high rate of rejection events was observed during the first year post-transplantation.

Bortezomib for acute humoral rejection treatment at the Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán in Mexico City: an update.

The use of bortezomib as a treatment modality of AHR improved and stabilized graft function (clinical response) in the majority of patients. Its use in single dose, even combined with rituximab, does not seem to be useful to obtain a sustained clinical response, or to reduce HLAabs level. The use of 4 doses of bortezomib in days 1, 4, 7, and 10 (1.3 mg/m2 BSA each) plus plasmapheresis produced both a good clinical response and a reduction in DSA. Moving forward, it will be necessary to define the long-term effectiveness of bortezomib and whether rituximab administration is indispensable to achieve this goal. Until now, it is evident that many patients needed retreatment and they were well tolerated.