Possible cytokine biomarkers in pediatric acute appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA) and decisions about its treatment remain among the most common dilemmas of pediatric surgical teams. Monitoring of immune response may be of importance for this purpose. Our aim was to measure and analyze serum and peritoneal fluid cytokines, in children who had undergone surgery for suspected AA. METHODS: Prospective investigation of serum and peritoneal fluid cytokine values was performed in 127 consecutive patients. According to the pathohistological findings, patients were divided into three groups: normal/early, uncomplicated and complicated AA. Determination of cytokine concentrations for 20 different cytokines was done using a commercial flow cytometry kit: Human Inflammation 20 plex BMS 819. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences in serum cytokine values between pathohistological groups were found for IP-10, MIP-1α and IL-10. Preoperative cut-off values of IP-10, MIP-1α and IL-10 between groups were obtained using ROC curve analysis. Positive correlations between serum and peritoneal concentrations were recorded for most of the analyzed cytokines. CONCLUSION: IP-10, MIP-1α and IL-10 showed potential in assessment of AA in children. Confirmatory studies with a larger number of patients are required to prove reliability of these biomarkers.

Outcome differences between simple and complex gastroschisis.

BACKGROUND: We reviewed differences of the outcome of newborn with simple and complex gastroschisis treated at our institution over the past fifteen years. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on all infants with gastroschisis treated at the Institute for mother and child health care, Belgrade, between 2001 and 2015 (n=70). Premature infants (<34 weeks of gestation) and babies with birth weight less than 1500 g were excluded (n=5). We compared outcomes in infants with simple gastroschisis and those with complex gastroschisis. An outcome analysis was performed for birth weight, gestational age, gender, mode of defect closure, presence of intestinal necrosis or perforation, reoperation, duration of mechanical ventilation and total parenteral nutrition, presence of bowel pseudoopstraction, sepsis, total duration of hospital stay, mortality rates. RESULTS: Of 65 patients, 15 (23,07%) had complex gastroschisis, including atresia 5 patients (33,3%), ischemic complication 9 patients (60%) and one patient with closing gastroschisis (6,66%). Sixty eight percent underwent primary closure.There was difference between the simple and the complex gastroschisis in duration of mechanical ventilation (P= ,000003), total parenteral nutrition (P= ,000019), bowel pseudoobstruction (P= ,00067), reoperation (P= ,00122), sepsis (P= ,0043), hospital stay (P= ,000198). In the simple gastroschisis group 92% of patients survived to discharge. In the complex gastroschisis group 3 patients died in hospital (P= ,338). CONCLUSIONS: More research should be focused to predict complex gastroschisis and to improve prenatal diagnosis and postnatal management, without a significant increase in morbidity and mortality. KEY WORDS: Complex, Gastroschisis, Outcomes, Simple, Vanishing.

Gastroschisis with gastric perforation and jejunal stenosis A rare association of anomalies.

AIM: Gastroschisis with prenatal gastric perforation and intestinal stenosis is a rare and serious anomaly. although there are several case reports, no case series exists to suggest the prognosis for these infants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this report a case of gastroschisis with gastric perforation and jejunal stenosis in male newborn is presented with literature review. The stomach, small bowel and the part of the colon were herniated through the abdominal wall defect. A large perforation site at the anterior wall of fundus and a thin fibrous strip that causing stenosis of jejunum was found. RESULTS: Gastrorraphy was performed. Stenosis of jejunum was resected and t-t anastomosis was performed, followed by primary fascial closure. DISCUSSION: The prenatal sonographic finding of bowel or gastric perforation are variable. Antenatal bowel dilatation and in particular intraabdominal bowel dilatation is prognostically useful for detection of patients with worse outcome. The absence of bowel dilatation cannot fully exclude complex patients. Early restoration of bowel continuity using primary anastomosis and primary abdominal wall closure are not associated with prolonged time for full enteral feeding and length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: We have presented the first detailed report of surgical intervention and outcomes in case of gastroschisis with prenatal gastric perforation and congenital jejunal stenosis. Early restoration of bowel continuity using primary anastomosis and primary abdominal wall closure is recommended here. More research should be focused to predict complex gastroschisis and to improve prenatal diagnosis and postnatal management, without a significant increase in morbidity and mortality. KEY WORDS: Gastroschisis, Gastric perforation, Stenosis of jejunum.

Gastroschisis with gastric perforation and jejunal stenosis. A rare association of anomalies.

AIM: Gastroschisis with prenatal gastric perforation and intestinal stenosis is a rare and serious anomaly. although there are several case reports, no case series exists to suggest the prognosis for these infants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this report a case of gastroschisis with gastric perforation and jejunal stenosis in male newborn is presented with literature review. The stomach, small bowel and the part of the colon were herniated through the abdominal wall defect. A large perforation site at the anterior wall of fundus and a thin fibrous strip that causing stenosis of jejunum was found. RESULTS: Gastrorraphy was performed. Stenosis of jejunum was resected and t-t anastomosis was performed, followed by primary fascial closure. DISCUSSION: The prenatal sonographic finding of bowel or gastric perforation are variable. Antenatal bowel dilatation and in particular intraabdominal bowel dilatation is prognostically useful for detection of patients with worse outcome. The absence of bowel dilatation cannot fully exclude complex patients. Early restoration of bowel continuity using primary anastomosis and primary abdominal wall closure are not associated with prolonged time for full enteral feeding and length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: We have presented the first detailed report of surgical intervention and outcomes in case of gastroschisis with prenatal gastric perforation and congenital jejunal stenosis. Early restoration of bowel continuity using primary anastomosis and primary abdominal wall closure is recommended here. More research should be focused to predict complex gastroschisis and to improve prenatal diagnosis and postnatal management, without a significant increase in morbidity and mortality. KEY WORDS: Gastroschisis, Gastric perforation, Stenosis of jejunum.