ABSTRACT
Connected health technology is playing an increasingly important role in healthcare. The power, complexity, functionality, and accessibility of connected health technologies are increasing rapidly, showing promise for improved and more equitable healthcare outcomes. They are integral to the lifecycle of medical products, from discovery and development to manufacturing and ultimately to the patient. The spectrum of integration between medical products and digital technologies ranges from non-drug specific solutions for supporting adherence or patient monitoring, which may or may not require regulatory approval, to digital therapeutics and software-containing combination products, which make claims supported by clinical evidence. The exponential increase and rapid evolution of connected health technologies - and the accompanying possibilities for innovative healthcare interventions, delivery systems, and clinical trial designs - pose new and complicated regulatory challenges. Currently, connected health may involve the use of regulated medical devices, including software as a medical device, or consumer products, such as wearables or apps, that fall under regulatory discretion. In this paper we examine how connected health technologies intersect with the development and lifecycle of medical products, how they are impacted by existing regulatory frameworks in the US, EU, and China, and propose future focus areas of activity.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Many regulators offered new ways of working to help combat the COVID-19 pandemic, and the rolling review procedure is an important and successful example. In rolling reviews, data are submitted and reviewed as they become available before the full data package is available. This approach is resource intensive but faster than standard review processes and therefore of benefit to society and patients during a health emergency. In this study, we analyze the European Medicines Agency (EMA) rolling review process and extract learning, based on the vaccines and treatments that have been approved to date (November 2021), and formulate 3 suggestions for the future. METHODS: Data and information on rolling reviews and similar related processes were collected from health authority websites across the globe with a focus on the EMA. Literature searches in PubMed and checking company websites for additional information were conducted to complement and corroborate findings as required. FINDINGS: The duration of a rolling review cycle and the number of cycles before a conditional marketing authorization differ among different applications. Through the rolling review process, COVID-19 vaccines could be approved in record times, ranging from 17 to 36 days. The rolling review process is not limited to vaccines but is applied to promising treatments as well. IMPLICATIONS: This study indicates that rolling reviews can be successfully conducted during a health emergency, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, to meet an unmet medical need. Other critical conditions or life-threatening diseases with unmet needs exist and may be suitable to be addressed by a rolling review process to accelerate patient access to life-changing treatments. Indeed, we call for an evaluation of the rolling review process, its use, and its efficiency to capture learning with the aim of building a new, lean, and effective expedited review procedure that could be institutionalized and added to the regulatory toolbox.
