ABSTRACT
BackgroundSARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines have demonstrated high immunogenicity in healthy subjects and preliminary results for people living with HIV (PLWHIV) are promising too. We have previously reported the persistence of spike-specific circulating IgG and memory B cells in healthy adults up to six months after mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Unfortunately, limited longitudinal data are available for PLWHIV and no evidence of persistent spike-specific B cells have been reported yet. MethodsWe investigated the humoral response and the persistence of spike-specific memory B cells up to six months after vaccination with two doses of mRNA vaccines in 84 PLWHIV under ART and compared them to healthy controls (HCs). Humoral response was analyzed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and with an angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and receptor binding domain (RBD) inhibition assay. PBMCs were analyzed with a cytofluorimetric approach for B cell phenotyping. FindingsSpike-specific IgG peaked 1 month after second dose and persisted up to six months after vaccination with no significant differences compared to HCs. The stratification of patients according to CD4+ T cell count showed a significantly lower IgG response in case of CD4<350/{micro}l, remarking the relevance of immune reconstitution. The ability of IgG of blocking the binding between ACE2 and RBD was detected in 58{middle dot}4% of PLWHIV, compared to 86{middle dot}2% in HCs. The amount of circulating spike-specific memory B cells detected in PLWHIV six months after vaccination was not significantly different from HCs, while there was prevalence of antigen-specific double negative (IgD-/CD27-) cells, compared to controls. InterpretationIn conclusion, the majority of PLWHIV developed spike-specific humoral and B cell responses that persist for at least six months after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. However, hints of HIV-dependent immune impairment were revealed by altered spike-specific B cell phenotypes and by reduced spike-specific humoral response in patients with low CD4+ T cell count (<350/{micro}l).
ABSTRACT
The continuous evolution of SARS-CoV-2 generated highly mutated variants, like omicron BA.1 and BA.2, able to escape natural and vaccine-induced primary immunity1,2. The administration of a third dose of mRNA vaccines induces a secondary response with increased protection. We investigated, at single-cell level, the longitudinal evolution of the neutralizing antibody response in four donors after three mRNA doses3. A total of 4,100 spike protein specific memory B cells were single cell sorted and 350 neutralizing antibodies were identified. The third dose increased the antibody neutralization potency and breadth against all SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern as previously observed with hybrid immunity3. However, the B cell repertoire that stands behind the response is dramatically different. The increased neutralizing response was largely due to the expansion of B cell germlines poorly represented after two doses, and the reduction of germlines predominant after primary immunization such as IGHV3-53;IGHJ6-1 and IGHV3-66;IGHJ4-1. Divergently to hybrid immunity, cross-protection after a third dose was mainly guided by Class 1/2 antibodies encoded by IGHV1-58;IGHJ3-1 and IGHV1-69;IGHJ4-1 germlines. The IGHV2-5;IGHJ3-1 germline, which induced broadly cross-reactive Class 3 antibodies after infection or viral vector vaccination, was not induced by a third mRNA dose. Our data show that while neutralizing breadth and potency can be improved by different immunization regimens, each of them has a unique molecular signature which should be considered while designing novel vaccines and immunization strategies.
ABSTRACT
To understand the nature of the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, we analyzed at single cell level the B cell responses of five naive and five convalescent people immunized with the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. Convalescents had higher frequency of spike protein specific memory B cells and by cell sorting delivered 3,532 B cells, compared with 2,352 from naive people. Of these, 944 from naive and 2,299 from convalescents produced monoclonal antibodies against the spike protein and 411 of them neutralized the original Wuhan SARS-CoV-2 virus. More than 75% of the monoclonal antibodies from naive people lost their neutralization activity against the B.1.351 (beta) and B.1.1.248 (gamma) variants while this happened only for 61% of those from convalescents. The overall loss of neutralization was lower for the B.1.1.7 (alpha) and B.1.617.2 (delta) variants, however it was always significantly higher in those of naive people. In part this was due to the IGHV2-5;IGHJ4-1 germline, which was found only in convalescents and generated potent and broadly neutralizing antibodies. Overall, vaccination of seropositive people increases the frequency of B cells encoding antibodies with high potency and that are not susceptible to escape by any of the four variants of concern. Our data suggest that people that are seropositive following infection or primary vaccination will produce antibodies with increased potency and breadth and will be able to better control SARS-CoV-2 emerging variants.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the problems in seeking dental care faced by HIV-positive individuals in Italy. METHODS: A multicenter observational study was performed by distributing an anonymous self-administered questionnaire to patients of six public healthcare facilities specialized in the treatment of individuals with HIV infection. The questions concerned personal data potentially correlated with discrimination, the patient-dentist relationship before and after HIV diagnosis, and the reasons for seeking dental care in public facilities. We also evaluated the patients' discomfort in the patient-dentist relationship after HIV diagnosis, performing univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Of the 1,500 questionnaires distributed; 883 were filled-out completely. A total of 630 persons received dental care after HIV diagnosis: 209 (33.2%) did not tell the dentist that they were seropositive. Of those who did, 56 were refused care. For patients treated by a private dentist, having been treated by the same dentist before diagnosis was a risk factor for great discomfort in the patient-dentist relationship (P < 0.002). Being treated in public facilities was associated with having received dental care after HIV diagnosis (P < 0.001) and a primary school education (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There exist episodes of discrimination on the part of some dentists, and a relatively high proportion of HIV-positive persons do not disclose their seropositivity to the dentist. Dentists should be provided with training for promoting both ethically acceptable practices and suitable clinical management of HIV-positive persons.
