Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Curr Pharm Biotechnol ; 22(3): 400-407, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32744965

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The world's population is still growing, having an impact on the environment and the economic growth of developing countries; so that, there is a particular interest in the development of new fertility control methods, focused on male contraception. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of methanolic extracts of leaf and fruit of Azadirachta indica on sperm quality and testicular histology of Long Evans rats. METHODS: Antifertility effects of a methanolic leaf and fruit extracts of A. indica on 24 male rats were investigated. The animals were randomly divided into two control groups and four treatment groups (n=4). Doses of the leaf and fruit extract were given at concentrations of 100 and 200 µg mL-1. RESULTS: A significant decrease in the viability of sperm cells was observed. The leaf extract at a concentration of 200 µg mL-1 inhibited cell viability compared to the negative control (p< 0.001). The percentage of abnormal cells in leaf extract was shown in 100 and 200 µg mL-1, the conditions at which a higher percentage of morphological irregularities of observed (15% and 16% respectively). The results show that there was cellular detachment in the seminiferous epithelium in the experimental groups treated with methanolic extracts. Sperm death was observed without decreasing the number of sperm. CONCLUSION: The methanolic extracts of Azadirachta indica have a modulating effect on the spermatogenesis of experimental rats through sperm morphological alterations.


Subject(s)
Azadirachta , Fruit , Plant Extracts/pharmacology , Plant Leaves , Spermatozoa/drug effects , Testis/drug effects , Animals , Infertility, Male/chemically induced , Infertility, Male/pathology , Male , Methanol/pharmacology , Plant Extracts/toxicity , Random Allocation , Rats , Rats, Long-Evans , Sperm Motility/drug effects , Sperm Motility/physiology , Spermatozoa/pathology , Spermatozoa/physiology , Testis/pathology , Testis/physiology
2.
Curr Pharm Biotechnol ; 21(10): 897-905, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31965941

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pathogens use multiple mechanisms to disrupt cell functioning in their host and allow pathogenesis. These mechanisms involve communication between the pathogen and the host cell through protein-protein interactions. METHODS: Protein-protein interactions chains referred to as signal transduction pathways are the processes by which a chemical or physical signal transmits through a cell as series of molecular events so the pathogen needs to intercept these molecular pathways at few positions to induce pathogenesis such as pathogen viability, infection or hypersensitivity. RESULTS: The pathogen nodes of interception are not necessarily the most immunogenic; so that novel immunogenicity-improvement strategies need to be developed thought a chemical conjugation of the pathogen-carrier nodes to develop an efficient immune response in order to block pathogenesis. On the other hand, if pathogen-carriers are immunogens; toleration ought to be induced by this conjugation avoiding hypersensitivity. Thus, this paper addresses the biological plausibility of plant-phenolics as pathogen-carrier immunogenicity modulator haptens. CONCLUSION: The plant-phenolic compounds have in their structure functional groups such as hydroxyl, carbonyl, carboxyl, ester, or ether, capable of reacting with the amino or carbonyl groups of the amino acids of a pathogen-carrier to form conjugates. Besides, the varied carbon structures these phenolic compounds have; it is possible to alter the pathogen-carrier related factors that determine the immunogenicity: 1) Structural complexity, 2) Molecular size, 3) Structural heterogeneity, 4) Accessibility to antigenic determinants or epitopes, 5) Optical configuration, 6) Physical state, or 7) Molecular rigidity.


Subject(s)
Adaptive Immunity/drug effects , Haptens/immunology , Host-Pathogen Interactions/immunology , Immunity, Innate/drug effects , Phenols/immunology , Plants/immunology , Adaptive Immunity/immunology , Amino Acids/chemistry , Amino Acids/immunology , Animals , Antigen-Presenting Cells/drug effects , Antigen-Presenting Cells/immunology , Humans , Immunity, Innate/immunology , Phenols/chemistry , Plants/chemistry , Signal Transduction
3.
Curr Pharm Biotechnol ; 20(15): 1236-1243, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31333121

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The immune system is responsible for providing protection to the body against foreign substances. The immune system divides into two types of immune responses to study its mechanisms of protection: 1) Innate and 2) Adaptive. The innate immune response represents the first protective barrier of the organism that also works as a regulator of the adaptive immune response, if evaded the mechanisms of the innate immune response by the foreign substance the adaptive immune response takes action with the consequent antigen neutralization or elimination. The adaptive immune response objective is developing a specific humoral response that consists in the production of soluble proteins known as antibodies capable of specifically recognizing the foreign agent; such protective mechanism is induced artificially through an immunization or vaccination. Unfortunately, the immunogenicity of the antigens is an intrinsic characteristic of the same antigen dependent on several factors. CONCLUSION: Vaccine adjuvants are chemical substances of very varied structure that seek to improve the immunogenicity of antigens. The main four types of adjuvants under investigation are the following: 1) Oil emulsions with an antigen in solution, 2) Pattern recognition receptors activating molecules, 3) Inflammatory stimulatory molecules or activators of the inflammasome complex, and 4) Cytokines. However, this paper addresses the biological plausibility of two phytochemical compounds as vaccine adjuvants: 5) Lectins, and 6) Plant phenolics whose characteristics, mechanisms of action and disadvantages are addressed. Finally, the immunological usefulness of these molecules is discussed through immunological data to estimate effects of plant phenolics and lectins as vaccine adjuvants, and current studies that have implanted these molecules as vaccine adjuvants, demonstrating the results of this immunization.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Immunologic/pharmacology , Lectins/pharmacology , Plants/chemistry , Polyphenols/pharmacology , Adaptive Immunity/drug effects , Adjuvants, Immunologic/isolation & purification , Animals , Antigens/immunology , Cytokines/immunology , Humans , Immunity, Innate/drug effects , Lectins/immunology , Lectins/isolation & purification , Polyphenols/immunology , Polyphenols/isolation & purification , Vaccination/methods , Vaccines/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...