Delayed cord clamping with stabilisation at all preterm births - feasibility and efficacy of a low cost technique.

OBJECTIVES: Meta-analysis data suggests that Delayed cord clamping (DCC) in preterm infants is associated with a 32% reduction in mortality. Reported rates of this intervention are low, particularly for caesarean deliveries. Perceived difficulties providing respiratory support and thermal care during DCC may be barriers to implementation of this intervention. Commercially available equipment to facilitate this can be expensive. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a simple, low cost technique to deliver respiratory support and thermal care during DCC at all preterm deliveries (including caesarean), with the hypothesis that this could increase rates of preterm infants receiving DCC. STUDY DESIGN: Data was collected retrospectively from 46 infants born at <32 weeks gestation in 2015. The technique was introduced in early 2017, as part of a perinatal Quality Improvement project. Data was collected prospectively from 63 infants born at <32 weeks gestation in 2017-2018. RESULTS: Rates of DCC in infants born <32 weeks gestation have increased from 12.5% in 2015 to 89.4% in 2017-2018. In 2017-2018, thermal care and respiratory support was provided to all infants who received DCC. CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary perinatal team working allowed development of a simple, low cost technique to deliver DCC at all preterm deliveries. We have demonstrated feasibility and efficacy of this technique, and a significant and sustained improvement in rates of DCC in our preterm population. We hope that by sharing this approach, other centres will be able to implement a similar strategy, closing the gap between evidence base and translation into clinical practice, and allowing provision of DCC for preterm infants as a standard part of high quality perinatal care.

Improving accessibility of trust guidelines and protocols at the Great Western Hospital, Swindon.

Trust guidelines and policies outline recommendations for the management of common clinical and non-clinical situations, serving to standardise best practice. Prior to this project, there was no consolidated location for these documents. Lack of organisational structure and inadequate search functionality within the trust intranet led to time wasted locating information, acting outside of recognised best practice, and ultimately potentially compromising patient safety. We surveyed 55 junior doctors, 95% of respondents were dependent on guidelines on a daily basis. 20% spending greater than 5 minutes to locate protocols and 38% unable to locate some relevant documents at all. We analysed the time taken for junior doctors to locate six randomly selected protocols. Pre-intervention mean time was 133 seconds (on six occasions doctors were unable to locate the guideline). All trust guidelines and protocols currently available on the intranet were collated, consolidated, and renamed according to content. These were then re-alphabetised and new search terms linked to each document. Existing links were then uploaded and a single web page made available via the trust intranet homepage. The new page was publicised by email, posters and interdepartmental presentations. In our post intervention survey, 97% of respondents were aware of the project and had made use of the page. All protocols were located during re-testing with 90% of those resurveyed stating it was easier to locate protocols. Overall, a reduction in the time and number of clicks required to locate protocols was demonstrated: mean time 16 seconds vs 133 seconds pre-intervention (n=60). 53% of guidelines located in <30s and 86% <2 minutes.

Selecting ambulatory emergency care (AEC) patients from the medical emergency in-take: the derivation and validation of the Amb score.

Accurate prediction of the likelihood of same-day discharge could make it possible to direct one-third of the medical in-take to an ambulatory care unit, thereby facilitating bed management. In Phase 1 of this study, we identified seven independent factors that contribute to an ambulatory care score (Amb score) that can potentially be used as a tool to select ambulatory emergency care (AEC) patients from the medical emergency in-take. A high score was associated with discharge within 12 hours of assessment and treatment in hospital. In Phase 2, we verified and internally validated the performance of the Amb score in a different cohort of patients, finding that it functioned well in identifying early discharges (ie AEC patients), with an area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) of 0.91 (95% CI 0.88-0.94). An Amb score of > or = 5 has a sensitivity of 96% (95% CI 90-98) and a specificity of 62% (95% CI 55-68) in identifying potential AEC patients.