ABSTRACT
This article discusses the importance and effectiveness of viscoelastic hemostatic assays (VHAs) in assessing hemostatic competence and guiding blood component therapy (BCT) in patients with postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). In recent years, VHAs such as thromboelastography and rotational thromboelastometry have increasingly been used to guide BCT, hemostatic adjunctive therapy and prohemostatic agents in PPH. The three pillars of identifying hemostatic competence include clinical observation, common coagulation tests, and VHAs. VHAs are advantageous because they assess the cumulative contribution of all components of the blood throughout the entire formation of a clot, have fast turnaround times, and are point-of-care tests that can be followed serially. Despite these advantages, VHAs are underused due to poor understanding of correct technique and result interpretation, a paucity of widespread standardization, and a lack of large clinical trials. These VHAs can also be used in cases of uterine atony, preeclampsia, acute fatty liver of pregnancy, amniotic fluid embolism, placental abruption, genital tract trauma, surgical trauma, and inherited and prepartum acquired coagulopathies. There exists an immediate need for a point-of-care test that can equip obstetricians with rapid results on developing coagulopathic states. The use of VHAs in predicting and treating PPH, although in an incipient state, can fulfill this need.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To develop a quantitative tool to assess severity of mycosis fungoides. DESIGN: Prospective analysis of a cohort. SETTING: University department of dermatology-based cutaneous lymphoma clinic. PATIENTS: From 1984 to 1995, 1186 visits from 323 referred patients seen in a multidisciplinary cutaneous lymphoma program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Severity-weighted assessment tool (SWAT) scores were obtained for patients at each visit. This score represents the product of the percentage total body surface area (%TBSA) involvement of each lesion type (patch, plaque, and tumor or ulceration), multiplied by a weighting factor: SWAT = (patch %TBSA x 1) + (plaque %TBSA x 2) + (tumor or ulcer %TBSA x 3). In addition, the standard measurements of TBSA involvement and physician global assessments were recorded for comparison. RESULTS: The SWAT score correlated well with %TBSA (r = 0.95, P<.001), physician global assessment (r = 0.60, P<.001), and time to complete remission during psoralen-UV-A therapy (r = 0.80, P<.001), therefore indicating validity against standard measures. Analysis of individual and subsets of patients demonstrated that the SWAT score more accurately quantified changes in skin disease burden, including mixed responses to treatment, than did %TBSA alone. CONCLUSIONS: The SWAT score is a useful clinical measurement for mycosis fungoides. The SWAT score captures overall physician impressions of disease status on a continuous dimensionless numerical scale, therefore providing a defined, objective, and sensitive quantitative measure. This tool is suitable for individual patient assessment, clinical trials, and outcome comparisons.
