Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Emerg Med J ; 21(1): 54-8, 2004 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14734377

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare the costs of two strategies for acute management of mild head injury: inhospital observation compared with acute computed tomography (CT) and home care. METHODS: Studies comparing costs for the two strategies that seem to have similar outcomes for patients were systematically reviewed. A decision tree analysis to compare the costs was also constructed, based on Swedish national costs and the risks found in a recent review on mild head injury complications. RESULTS: No studies were found that directly measured and compared risks, benefits, and costs of the two strategies. In the four studies retrieved, involving 4126 patients, the costs for hospital observation were factual, but a model was used to evaluate costs for the CT strategy. On average, costs were one third lower with CT. Also, the decision tree analysis demonstrated that the CT strategy was one third less expensive than inhospital observation. A sensitivity analysis showed this to be valid for nearly all cases. If these calculations hold true, a change of strategy could result in annual savings of pound 280,000/million inhabitants. CONCLUSION: The CT strategy seems to cost one third less than hospital observation.


Subject(s)
Craniocerebral Trauma/diagnostic imaging , Patient Selection , Costs and Cost Analysis , Craniocerebral Trauma/economics , Decision Trees , Emergencies , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , Radiography , Treatment Outcome
3.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 50(1): 35-47, 2000 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10936667

ABSTRACT

To analyze the excess costs of medical care during the first decade after diabetes diagnosis, we surveyed two national incidence cohorts who contracted diabetes at age of 15-34 years and matched control groups from the general population of Sweden. Ninety percent of the diabetic subjects were on insulin treatment. Data on healthcare utilization and use of glucose lowering drugs and medical devices were collected via a questionnaire mailed to a recent cohort 1 year after diagnosis and a previously registered cohort 8 years after diagnosis. Costing was based on average national costs of hospital inpatient and out-patient care, an original study of daycare costs, and sales prices of the National Corporation of Swedish Pharmacies. One year after diabetes diagnosis, the annual excess costs of care were US$4743 among men and US$4976 among women (1997 prices). Hospital inpatient care accounted for more than 50% of the excess costs. Eight years after diagnosis, the excess costs were US$2010 among men and US$2734 among women. The higher costs for women were mainly related to hospital out-patient care, but also to more intensive self-monitoring. We conclude that diabetes in young and middle-aged people is a major economic challenge even before significant complications may have developed.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/economics , Diabetes Mellitus/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Age of Onset , Cohort Studies , Costs and Cost Analysis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/therapy , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Sex Characteristics , Sweden/epidemiology , Time Factors , United States
5.
Lakartidningen ; 95(50): 5758-62, 1998 Dec 09.
Article in Swedish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9889496

ABSTRACT

In Sweden, patients with minor head injury (i.e., history of loss of consciousness or posttraumatic amnesia) are routinely admitted for neurological observation. The article reports the results of a small study of current clinical practices at St Göran's Hospital in Stockholm, and briefly reviews published reports of different management strategies. The findings suggest that computed tomography scanning might constitute better management than routine hospitalisation, both medically and economically. However, further investigation from a Swedish perspective is needed before any evidence-based recommendations can be made.


Subject(s)
Brain Concussion/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Brain Concussion/diagnosis , Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Humans , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Sweden , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/economics
7.
Stroke ; 25(12): 2363-9, 1994 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7974574

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cost-effectiveness analyses of stroke management are hampered by paucity of economic data. We made an update of the direct and indirect costs of stroke in Sweden (population, 8.5 million). METHODS: Direct costs (ie, the costs for hospital and outpatient care and social services) were estimated on the basis of two prospective population-based studies of stroke and of two nationwide cross-sectional inventories of bed-days and diagnoses. Indirect costs (ie, the costs for loss of productivity and early retirement) were based on official statistics. RESULTS: The direct annual costs of care for stroke patients in 1991 equaled 7836 million Swedish krona (SKr) ($1306 million in US dollars), and the indirect costs, 2430 million SKr ($405 million). The cost of stroke care was 1208 SKr ($201) per inhabitant in Sweden. The expected direct costs per patient from first stroke to death were 440,000 SKr ($73,333). When prestroke costs for other diseases and advanced age were subtracted, the sum was reduced to 180,000 SKr ($30,000). CONCLUSIONS: Costs for hospital and outpatient care and social services accounted for 76% of Swedish stroke costs and for 24% of costs for loss of production and early retirement. Only 41% of direct costs were stroke-related.


Subject(s)
Cerebrovascular Disorders/economics , Health Care Costs , Aged , Ambulatory Care/economics , Bed Occupancy/economics , Cerebrovascular Disorders/epidemiology , Cerebrovascular Disorders/mortality , Cerebrovascular Disorders/therapy , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Costs and Cost Analysis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Efficiency , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hospital Costs , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , Length of Stay/economics , Life Tables , Male , Population Surveillance , Prospective Studies , Registries , Retirement/economics , Social Work/economics , Sweden/epidemiology
8.
BMJ ; 305(6867): 1457-60, 1992 Dec 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1493390

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential effects of primary prevention with anticoagulants or aspirin in atrial fibrillation on Swedish population. DESIGN: Analysis of cost effectiveness based on the following assumptions: about 83,000 people have atrial fibrillation in Sweden, of whom 22,000 would be potential candidates for treatment with anticoagulants and 55,000 for aspirin treatment; the annual 5% stroke rate is reduced by 64% (with anticoagulants) and 25% (with aspirin); incidence of intracranial haemorrhage of 0.3%, 1.3%, or 2.0% per year; direct and indirect costs of a stroke of Kr180,000 and Kr90,000; estimated annual cost of treatment is Kr5030 for anticoagulants and Kr100 for aspirin. SETTING: Total Swedish population. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Direct and indirect costs of stroke saved, number of strokes prevented, and cost of preventive treatment. RESULTS: Depending on the rate of haemorrhagic complications 34 to 83 patients would need to be treated annually with anticoagulants to prevent one stroke; 83 patients would need to be treated with aspirin. Giving anticoagulant treatment only would reduce costs by Kr60 million if the incidence of intracranial haemorrhage were 0.3% but would imply a net expense if the complication rate exceeded 1.3%. The total savings from giving anticoagulant (22,000 patients) and aspirin (55,000 patients) treatment would be Kr175 million per year corresponding to 2 million pounds per million inhabitants each year. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with anticoagulants and, if contraindications exist, with aspirin is cost effective provided that the risk of serious haemorrhage complications due to anticoagulants is kept low.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Cerebrovascular Disorders/economics , Cerebrovascular Disorders/prevention & control , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Primary Prevention/economics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Atrial Fibrillation/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Drug Costs , Humans , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Sweden , Value of Life
11.
Health Care Manage Rev ; 2(2): 37-53, 1977.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10309095

ABSTRACT

Today, managers are being asked to analyze and justify the costs for new and expensive equipment. In the case of the CAT Scanner, however, there has been little "hard" information available. To fill the gap, the authors present the findings of several Swedish studies that compare the uses and the costs of the CAT Scanner with other diagnostic techniques.


Subject(s)
Costs and Cost Analysis , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/economics , Cerebral Angiography/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Equipment and Supplies, Hospital/economics , Pneumoencephalography/economics , State Medicine , Sweden , Technology Assessment, Biomedical , Technology, High-Cost , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/instrumentation , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...