Epidemiology and treatment of hepatitis E in the liver transplantation setting: A literature review.

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a common cause of acute hepatitis in developing countries, but it can also take a chronic course especially in immunocompromised patients. Its epidemiology after liver transplantation (LT) is hard to assess and treatment options are still explored. Between 2009 and 2020, literature reporting HEV prevalence and treatment in LT recipients was searched and a synthesis was attempted. Sixteen studies reported HEV prevalence in consecutive LT patients: HEV RNA positivity ranged between 0%-1.4% and 0%-7.7% for Western and Eastern cohorts, respectively. In studies published between 2009-2014 and 2015-2020, HEV RNA positivity ranged between 0.35%-1.3% (all European) and 0%-7.7% (European: 0%-1.4%), respectively. Five studies evaluated HEV prevalence in LT recipients with abnormal liver enzymes: HEV RNA positivity was 2.9% in studies published between 2009 and 2014 and from 3.5% to 20% in studies published between 2015 and 2020. Twenty-seven studies reported HEV treatment in LT recipients: sustained virologic response was achieved in 15% by immunosuppression reduction alone and in 83% of cases by ribavirin regiments. Chronic HEV infection is affecting LT recipients, mostly those with abnormal liver enzymes and in Eastern countries. HEV diagnoses should be based on PCR techniques. Successful treatment can be achieved with ribavirin in most cases.

The changing epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma in Greece.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer globally, and is attributable mainly to viral hepatitis, alcohol and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. METHODS: Three hundred Greek patients diagnosed with HCC between 2000 and 2019 were retrospectively evaluated for patient and HCC characteristics. Patients were classified as before 2011 (A) or after 2011 (B) and HCC risk factors were compared with historic Greek cohorts. RESULTS: The median age was 64 years and 86% were male; 45% had chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, 26% chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, and 30% non-viral liver diseases (nvLD). No change was observed among liver diseases between periods A and B. However, there was a trend towards a decrease in virally and an increase in non-virally induced HCC (P=0.075). Patients in period B (vs. A) were more likely to be diagnosed with fewer (<3, P=0.006) and smaller (<3 cm, P=0.005) nodules. Compared with 1558 Greek HCC patients from 1974-2000, there was a decrease in HBV and an increase in HCV and nvLD-related HCCs (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In Greece, after 2000, there was a decrease in the proportion of HBV and an increase in the proportion of HCV and nvLD-related HCC, while over the last 2 decades there has been a trend towards a decrease in virally and an increase in non-virally induced HCC. Since 2011, HCC is being diagnosed at an earlier stage, possibly reflecting improved surveillance strategies.

Epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease in the developed countries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the NAFLD prevalence in European adults and children/adolescents of the general population and specific subgroups. METHOD: Search for all articles published between 01/1990-06/2019 reporting NAFLD prevalence from European countries. RESULTS: Nineteen studies with adults and 9 with children/adolescents were included. Pooled NAFLD prevalence in adults was 26.9%, being higher in studies using ultrasonography (27.2%) or fatty liver index (FLI) (30.1%) than liver biochemical tests (19.1%) and without differences between Mediterranean and non-Mediterranean countries or publication periods. Pooled NAFLD prevalence was higher in men than women (32.8% vs. 19.6%) and in patients with than those without metabolic syndrome (75.3% vs. 17.9%) or any of its components (always P<0.01). Ultrasound and FLI performed equally in estimating NAFLD prevalence in most subgroups. A higher prevalence was reported using FLI in obese and in diabetic patients, whereas a higher prevalence was observed with ultrasound in non-obese patients and in individuals without metabolic syndrome. NAFLD prevalence was 2.7% in unselected and 31.6% in obese/overweight children/adolescents. CONCLUSIONS: NAFLD prevalence exceeds 25% in European adults, being higher in those with metabolic syndrome component(s)-related comorbidities. It remains low in unselected NAFLD population, but increased in overweight/obese European children/adolescents, particularly from Mediterranean countries.