Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Med Image Anal ; 16(3): 642-61, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20452269

ABSTRACT

Registration of pre- and intra-interventional data is one of the key technologies for image-guided radiation therapy, radiosurgery, minimally invasive surgery, endoscopy, and interventional radiology. In this paper, we survey those 3D/2D data registration methods that utilize 3D computer tomography or magnetic resonance images as the pre-interventional data and 2D X-ray projection images as the intra-interventional data. The 3D/2D registration methods are reviewed with respect to image modality, image dimensionality, registration basis, geometric transformation, user interaction, optimization procedure, subject, and object of registration.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Artificial Intelligence , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Pattern Recognition, Automated/methods , Subtraction Technique , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Humans , Image Enhancement/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
Med Phys ; 38(3): 1481-90, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21520860

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: In this article, the authors propose a new gold standard data set for the validation of two-dimensional/three-dimensional (2D/3D) and 3D/3D image registration algorithms. METHODS: A gold standard data set was produced using a fresh cadaver pig head with attached fiducial markers. The authors used several imaging modalities common in diagnostic imaging or radiotherapy, which include 64-slice computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging using T1, T2, and proton density sequences, and cone beam CT imaging data. Radiographic data were acquired using kilovoltage and megavoltage imaging techniques. The image information reflects both anatomy and reliable fiducial marker information and improves over existing data sets by the level of anatomical detail, image data quality, and soft-tissue content. The markers on the 3D and 2D image data were segmented using ANALYZE 10.0 (AnalyzeDirect, Inc., Kansas City, KN) and an in-house software. RESULTS: The projection distance errors and the expected target registration errors over all the image data sets were found to be less than 2.71 and 1.88 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The gold standard data set, obtained with state-of-the-art imaging technology, has the potential to improve the validation of 2D/3D and 3D/3D registration algorithms for image guided therapy.


Subject(s)
Databases, Factual , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/standards , Algorithms , Animals , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Fiducial Markers , Head/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Swine , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
3.
Phys Med Biol ; 55(19): N465-71, 2010 Oct 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20844334

ABSTRACT

A growing number of clinical applications using 2D/3D registration have been presented recently. Usually, a digitally reconstructed radiograph is compared iteratively to an x-ray image of the known projection geometry until a match is achieved, thus providing six degrees of freedom of rigid motion which can be used for patient setup in image-guided radiation therapy or computer-assisted interventions. Recently, stochastic rank correlation, a merit function based on Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, was presented as a merit function especially suitable for 2D/3D registration. The advantage of this measure is its robustness against variations in image histogram content and its wide convergence range. The considerable computational expense of computing an ordered rank list is avoided here by comparing randomly chosen subsets of the DRR and reference x-ray. In this work, we show that it is possible to omit the sorting step and to compute the rank correlation coefficient of the full image content as fast as conventional merit functions. Our evaluation of a well-calibrated cadaver phantom also confirms that rank correlation-type merit functions give the most accurate results if large differences in the histogram content for the DRR and the x-ray image are present.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Animals , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Phantoms, Imaging , Stochastic Processes , Time Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...