Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Epidemiol Community Health ; 63(8): 610-22, 2009 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19386612

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Interventions to change health-related behaviours have potential to increase health inequalities. METHODS: This review investigated the effectiveness of interventions targeting low-income groups to reduce smoking or increase physical activity and/or healthy eating. Of 9766 papers identified by the search strategy, 13 met the inclusion criteria. Intervention content was coded into component technique and theoretical basis, and examined as a potential source of effect heterogeneity. RESULTS: Interventions were heterogeneous, comprising 4-19 techniques. Nine interventions had positive effects, seven resulted in no change and one had an adverse effect. Effective interventions had a tendency to have fewer techniques than ineffective interventions, with no evidence for any technique being generally effective or ineffective. Only six studies cited theory relative to intervention development, with little information about how theory was used and no obvious association with intervention content or effect. CONCLUSION: This review shows that behaviour change interventions, particularly those with fewer techniques, can be effective in low-income groups, but highlights the lack of evidence to draw on in informing the design of interventions for disadvantaged groups.


Subject(s)
Feeding Behavior/psychology , Health Promotion/methods , Motor Activity , Smoking Cessation/psychology , Behavior Therapy/methods , Health Behavior , Humans , Models, Theoretical , Risk Reduction Behavior , Smoking Cessation/methods , Social Class
2.
Health Educ Res ; 16(2): 143-56, 2001 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11345659

ABSTRACT

This paper reports on an investigation into smoking amongst 14- to 15-year-old Bangladeshis living in an UK inner city locality. A survey using self-completion questionnaires was undertaken in conjunction with focus group discussions. The survey of 316 Bangladeshi adolescents was conducted to determine smoking prevalence. Regular smoking was more common amongst Bangladeshi males (39%) than amongst Bangladeshi females (11%). Thirty-one people (17 females and 14 males) took part in seven focus groups (four female and three male) which were conducted in schools (six) and youth clubs (one). Focus group discussions were conducted to examine what smoking means to Bangladeshi teenagers and factors which influence why they do or do not smoke. Differences between what smoking means to Bangladeshi females and males are identified which arise from perceived social norms and cultural values, and greatly influence smoking uptake. However, many of the reasons why Bangladeshi adolescents continue to smoke, stop smoking or never smoke appear similar to those identified in other studies with largely white adolescents. Factors underpinning adolescent choices together with the implications of the study findings for the development of smoking prevention initiatives for inner city Bangladeshi teenagers are discussed.


Subject(s)
Adolescent Behavior , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Smoking/ethnology , Adolescent , Bangladesh/ethnology , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Male , Poverty Areas , Prevalence , Sex Factors , Smoking/psychology , Smoking Prevention , United Kingdom/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...