Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Acta Odontol Scand ; 79(4): 296-301, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33945398

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dentists are often exposed to occupational health hazards such as stress, high workload, and ergonomic and mental strain. However, there are limited studies focussing on occupational health and factors associated with working conditions. The aim of this study was to identify possible gender differences and factors associated with a high workload. METHOD: The study population comprised of 187 dentists (123 women and 64 men) who had been working between 5 and 12 years. All participants completed a questionnaire regarding perceived workload and different working conditions. In the logistic regression analyses, gender and employment (employee or employer/manger), influence over work, social support, ergonomics, and working hours were used as independent covariates. RESULTS: Poor satisfaction with ergonomic conditions and low influence on the work situation were reported by 40 and 47% of the participants, respectively. Female dentists were more often employees, reported lower influence over work situation, and more often worked part-time compared to male dentists. Those who reported a high workload significantly more often experienced that they had low influence over work, low levels of social support, and were not satisfied with ergonomic working conditions. CONCLUSION: Dentists with low influence over work, low levels of social support, and who were unsatisfied with the ergonomic conditions reported higher levels of workload. The dentists experienced a similar workload, regardless of employment and gender. Preventive actions at the workplace in order to maintain a moderate workload promote both individual and organizational measures, to minimize the risk of poor occupational health.


Subject(s)
Dentists , Workload , Causality , Female , Humans , Male , Surveys and Questionnaires , Workplace
2.
J Oral Rehabil ; 47(2): 143-149, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31520538

ABSTRACT

The best treatment strategy for disturbing temporomandibular clicking sounds is not known. The aim was to evaluate the effect of exercise and bite splint therapy, respectively, in patients with symptomatic disc displacement with reduction. The study was a randomised clinical trial of subjects with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) clicking sounds with a reported severity/intensity of ≥4 on a numerical rating scale (0-10) and signs fulfilling the Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC/TMD) for disc displacement with reduction. Thirty subjects each were randomised to bite splint, home exercise, or supervised exercise programme at the clinic. Two examiners (authors), blinded to the treatment modality, examined the same subject at baseline and at a 3-month follow-up. Non-parametric statistical methods were applied for analyses. A P-value <.05 was considered statistically significant. The dropout rate was highest in the home exercise group. About 50% of the participants reported improvement of their TMJ sounds with no significant difference between treatments. In the supervised exercise and the bite splint groups, approximately 2/3 of the patients reported 30% or more improvement of their TMJ sounds and half reported 50% improvement or more. The supervised exercise group also showed reductions in TMD pain, neck disability, mood disturbances and somatisation. Jaw exercise programmes and bite splint treatments had positive effects on TMJ clicking. The supervised exercise programme had an additional effect on the subject's well-being and thus may help to encourage patient's empowerment and coping strategies.


Subject(s)
Joint Dislocations , Temporomandibular Joint Disc , Humans , Occlusal Splints , Splints , Treatment Outcome
3.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health ; 93(2): 271-278, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31654126

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Work ability can be measured by the work ability index (WAI), and work-related questions measuring productivity loss in terms of quality and quantity of work. Dentists have high occupational risk of musculoskeletal pain and the exposure of ergonomic strain is already high during dental education. The aim was to evaluate work ability and productivity among dentists, and to identify gender differences and associations with sleep, stress, and reported frequent pain. METHODS: The study population comprised 187 dentists (123 women and 64 men) who had been working as dentists between 5 and 12 years. Participants completed a questionnaire regarding sleep, stress, presence of pain at different sites, work ability assessed by WAI, and productivity in terms of quality and quantity of work. RESULTS: Poor sleep quality and high level of stress were reported by 31% and 48.1% of participants, respectively, with no gender differences and no association with age. The prevalence of frequent pain ranged 6.4-46.5% with shoulders being the most prevalent site. Thirty-three percent reported reduced work ability. Poor sleep, high amount of stress, and multi-site pain were associated with decreased work ability. CONCLUSIONS: A high prevalence of pain was shown among dentists. Decreased work ability in terms of productivity loss was associated with poor sleep quality, high amount of stress, and multi-site pain. Preventive actions at the workplace should promote good musculoskeletal health, and measures taken, both individual and organizational, to minimize the risk of high, persistent stress and work-related pain.


Subject(s)
Dentists , Musculoskeletal Pain/epidemiology , Occupational Stress , Sleep , Adult , Cohort Studies , Ergonomics , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Surveys and Questionnaires , Sweden
4.
Acta Odontol Scand ; 72(8): 788-94, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24702010

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Headaches represent a significant public health problem, but the knowledge of factors specifically related to incidence and persistence of headaches is still limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether gender, self-reported bruxism and variations in the dental occlusion contribute to onset and persistence of frequent headaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population comprised 280 dental students, examined annually in a 2-year prospective study with a questionnaire and a clinical examination of the jaw function. In the analysis subjects were dichotomized into cases with frequent (once a week or more) or without frequent headaches (controls). The 2-year cumulative incidence was based on subjects without frequent headaches at baseline. Cases with 2-year persistent headaches reported such symptoms at all three examinations. Self-reported bruxism and factors in the dental occlusion at baseline were used as independent variables in logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The 2-year cumulative incidence of frequent headaches was 21%. Female gender (OR = 2.6; CI = 1.3-5.4), self-reported bruxism (OR = 2.3; CI = 1.2-4.4) and mandibular instability in intercuspal position (OR = 3.2; CI = 1.4-7.5) were associated with incidence of frequent headaches. Persistent headaches during the observation period were present in 12 individuals (4%) and significantly related to mandibular instability in intercuspal position (OR = 6.1; CI = 1.6-22.6). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that female gender, self-reported bruxism and mandibular instability in intercuspal position are of importance in the development of frequent headaches. In management of these patients a multidisciplinary approach including dentists may be important and, thus, advocated.


Subject(s)
Headache/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Bruxism/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Dental Occlusion , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Malocclusion/epidemiology , Mandible/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Self Report , Sex Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Sweden/epidemiology , Young Adult
5.
Acta Odontol Scand ; 68(5): 289-99, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20528485

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyze whether gender, self-reported bruxism, and variations in dental occlusion predicted incidence and persistence of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) during a 2-year period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study population comprised 280 dental students at Umeå University in Sweden. The study design was that of a case-control study within a 2-year prospective cohort. The investigation comprised a questionnaire and a clinical examination at enrolment and at 12 and 24 months. Cases (incidence) and controls (no incidence) were identified among those without signs and symptoms of TMD at the start of the study. Cases with 2-year persistence of signs and symptoms of TMD were those with such signs and symptoms at all three examinations. Clinical registrations of baseline variables were used as independent variables. Odds ratio estimates and 95% confidence intervals of the relative risks of being a case or control in relation to baseline registrations were calculated using logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The analyses revealed that self-reported bruxism and crossbite, respectively increased the risk of the 2-year cumulative incidence and duration of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) signs or symptoms. Female gender was related to an increased risk of developing and maintaining myofascial pain. Signs of mandibular instability increased the risk of maintained TMD signs and symptoms during the observation period. CONCLUSION: This 2-year prospective observational study indicated that self-reported bruxism and variations in dental occlusion were linked to the incidence and persistence of TMJ signs and symptoms to a higher extent than to myofascial pain.


Subject(s)
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/etiology , Age Factors , Bruxism/complications , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Dental Occlusion, Centric , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Forecasting , Headache/physiopathology , Humans , Jaw Relation Record , Male , Malocclusion/complications , Mandible/physiopathology , Prospective Studies , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/physiopathology , Young Adult
6.
Eur J Pain ; 14(4): 366-71, 2010 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19640751

ABSTRACT

Temporomandibular disorders (TMD), headaches, and spinal pain show co-morbidity and may therefore influence each other. The hypothesis tested is that the presence of any of these conditions will increase the risk of onset of new symptoms within a 2-year period. The study population comprised 280 dental students, who were examined three times at 12-month intervals. The incidence was calculated for a 2-year period, based on subjects without the defined symptom at baseline. Each participant was classified into five different case-control groups, representing incidence cases or no incidence (controls) of: (1) nonpain TMD symptoms; (2) jaw pain; (3) headaches; (4) spinal pain; and (5) TMD pain. Presence of headaches and of spinal pain and signs and symptoms of TMD at baseline were used as independent variables in logistic regression analyses, controlling for age and sex. Incidence cases with TMD pain reported spinal pain at baseline significantly more often than the controls, and were mostly women. Incidence cases with headaches and incidence cases with jaw pain significantly more often had signs of TMD and reported spinal pain at baseline, compared to controls. Incidence cases with nonpain TMD symptoms or spinal pain significantly more often presented with signs of TMD at baseline. Our findings show that pain and dysfunction in trigeminally innervated areas and pain in spinally innervated areas mutually predict the onset of new symptoms in dental students, indicating common pathophysiological mechanisms and individual vulnerability. This may be of importance in risk assessment and treatment planning of individuals with musculoskeletal pain.


Subject(s)
Pain/physiopathology , Spinal Cord/physiopathology , Trigeminal Nerve/physiopathology , Adolescent , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Headache/psychology , Humans , Jaw/physiopathology , Logistic Models , Male , Odds Ratio , Pain/epidemiology , Pain Measurement , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Surveys and Questionnaires , Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome/physiopathology , Terminology as Topic , Young Adult
7.
Acta Odontol Scand ; 66(2): 113-21, 2008 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18446553

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to examine the 1-year period prevalence, incidence, and course of myofascial pain in the jaw-face region, and to analyze whether female gender, dental occlusion, and oral parafunctions have any influence on these signs and symptoms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study population comprised 308 dental students examined at the start of their dentistry course and re-examined after 1 year. Case histories were collected using a questionnaire. The clinical examination included palpation sites of muscles, a submaximal clenching test, measurements of maximal mandibular mobility, and classification of morphological and functional dental occlusion. RESULTS: The 1-year period prevalence of frequent myofascial symptoms was 19%. The incidence of myofascial pain, according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TemporoMandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD), was 4%. The female students presented an almost 4-fold incidence rate of myofascial symptoms compared to the male students. Non-symptomatic subjects were found predominantly among men, among those unaware of bruxism with bilateral contact in the retruded contact position (RCP), and among those with a stable intercuspal position (ICP). Variations in morphological occlusion did not show any relation to myofascial symptoms, nor did contact patterns in eccentric positions. CONCLUSIONS: Female dental students were more prone to developing frequent myofascial pain and to perceiving local muscle soreness than were male students during a 1-year period. Both self-reported bruxism and registered mandibular instability in ICP showed association with the 1-year period prevalence of myofascial signs and symptoms in the jaw-face region.


Subject(s)
Facial Pain/epidemiology , Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Bruxism/complications , Facial Pain/etiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Logistic Models , Male , Malocclusion/complications , Masticatory Muscles/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Sweden/epidemiology , Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome/etiology
8.
Acta Odontol Scand ; 65(2): 119-27, 2007 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17453430

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to investigate the incidence and recovery of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain and dysfunction during a 1-year period, and to examine factors associated with TMJ signs and symptoms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study population comprised 371 dental students examined at the start of education, out of which 308 were re-examined after 1 year. Case histories were collected with the aid of a questionnaire. The clinical examination involved TMJ mobility, TMJ pain, TMJ sounds, morphological and functional dental occlusion. RESULTS: The 1-year incidence of TMJ signs and/or symptoms was 12%, with no statistically significant difference between men and women. Reported TMJ sounds (10%) and clinically registered TMJ pain (8%) reached the highest incidence rates. Approximately a quarter of those who had TMJ signs and/or symptoms at baseline had recovered at follow-up. Subjects with a non-symptomatic TMJ were significantly more often found among men and among those with bilateral contacts in centric relation, a normal transverse inter-maxillary relationship, and a stabile mandibular position in centric occlusion. CONCLUSION: The 1-year incidence of TMJ pain and/or dysfunction was high among 1st-year university students. The persistence of signs and symptoms during the observation period was related to gender, while incidence and disappearance of symptoms were not. Dental occlusion was not rejected as a possible concurrent factor in relation to TMJ pain and/or dysfunction among university students.


Subject(s)
Arthralgia/epidemiology , Facial Pain/epidemiology , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Arthralgia/etiology , Dental Occlusion , Facial Pain/etiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Joint Instability/complications , Joint Instability/epidemiology , Logistic Models , Male , Malocclusion/complications , Malocclusion/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Range of Motion, Articular , Sex Factors , Students, Dental , Surveys and Questionnaires , Sweden/epidemiology , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/complications , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/etiology
9.
Int J Prosthodont ; 16(1): 70-3, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12675459

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Earlier studies on low-fusing ceramics have shown the occurrence of changes over time regarding surface and color. The present prospective study is an ongoing follow-up of an intraindividual comparison between two metal-ceramic systems, the Procera system (titanium copings veneered with a low-fusing ceramic) and noble-alloy copings veneered with a medium-fusing ceramic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one crown pairs were fabricated for 18 patients. After 5 years, 18 crown pairs in 15 patients were available for comparison. The crowns were examined shortly after cementation (baseline), and after 1, 2, and 5 years. The crowns were rated according to the CDA system. Bleeding index and margin index were also evaluated. RESULTS: Obvious changes regarding surface and color were noted for the titanium-ceramic crowns. The difference between the two types of crowns was statistically significant at 5 years (P = .004). The differences between the two systems regarding anatomic form, margin integrity, bleeding index, and margin index were small. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, it is concluded that low-fusing ceramic-veneered titanium copings are inferior to medium-fusing ceramic-veneered conventional copings regarding surface and color of the ceramic. Therefore, conventional ceramic-veneered crowns seem to be preferable, at least in the anterior area, where the esthetic requirements are greater than in premolar and molar regions. Whether possible changes in the properties of low-fusing ceramics will reduce the differences between the two types of metal-ceramic crowns remains to be proven.


Subject(s)
Crowns , Dental Porcelain/chemistry , Metal Ceramic Alloys/chemistry , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Color , Dental Prosthesis Design , Dental Veneers , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gold Alloys/chemistry , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Periodontal Index , Prospective Studies , Statistics as Topic , Surface Properties , Titanium/chemistry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...