Long-Term Outcomes of Cervical Cancer Patients Treated With Definitive Chemoradiation Following a Complete Metabolic Response.

AIMS: A complete metabolic response (CMR) on early post-treatment 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is a positive prognostic factor for cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation, but long-term outcomes of this group of patients are unknown. Patterns of failure and risk subgroups are identified. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who received curative-intent chemoradiation from 1998 to 2018 for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB1-IVA cervical cancer and had a CMR on post-treatment FDG-PET within 5 months of treatment completion were included. Cox proportional hazards models determined factors associated with locoregional and distant failure. Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from any recurrence (FFR) of patient subgroups were compared with Log-rank tests. RESULTS: There were 402 patients with a CMR after chemoradiation on FDG-PET. Initial T stage was T1 (38%)/T2 (40%)/T3 (20%)/T4 (2%); initial FDG-avid nodal status was no nodes (50%)/pelvic lymph nodes (40%)/pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes (10%). After a median follow-up of 6 years, 109 (27%) recurred. The pattern of recurrence was locoregional (27%), distant (61%) or both (12%). No factors were associated with locoregional failure. Distant recurrence was more likely in patients with T3-4 lesions (hazard ratio = 2.4, 95% confidence interval 1.5-3.8) and involvement of pelvic (hazard ratio = 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.0-2.7) or para-aortic lymph nodes (hazard ratio = 2.7, 95% confidence interval 1.4-5.0) at diagnosis. The 5-year FFR rates for T1-2 patients with no nodes, pelvic nodes alone or para-aortic nodes at diagnosis were 85, 76 and 62%, respectively (P = 0.04, none versus para-aortic nodes). The 5-year FFR for T3-4 patients with no nodes, pelvic nodes alone or para-aortic nodes at diagnosis were 68, 56 and 25%, respectively (P = 0.09, none versus para-aortic nodes). CONCLUSIONS: T3-4 tumours and para-aortic nodal involvement at diagnosis are poor prognostic factors, even after a CMR following chemoradiation.

Indomethacin-induced radiosensitization and inhibition of ionizing radiation-induced NF-kappaB activation in HeLa cells occur via a mechanism involving p38 MAP kinase.

Although ionizing radiation (IR) activates multiple cellular factors that vary depending on dose and tissue specificity, the activation of NF-kappaB appears to be a well-conserved response in tumor cells exposed to IR. Recently, it also has been demonstrated that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents inhibit tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-1-induced NF-kappaB activation and act as radiosensitizing agents. These observations reinforce the growing notion that NF-kappaB may be a protective cellular factor responding to the cytotoxicity of IR and other damaging stimuli. As such, we addressed the idea and mechanism that NF-kappaB is a downstream target of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent indomethacin and is involved in the process of radiosensitization. In this study, we report that indomethacin inhibited IR-induced activation of NF-kappaB and sensitized HeLa cells to IR-induced cytotoxicity at similar concentrations. Pretreatment of HeLa cells with SB 203580, a pyridinyl imidazole compound that specifically inhibits p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), abrogated the ability of indomethacin to inhibit IR-induced activation of NF-kappaB and diminished the indomethacin radiosensitizing effect. In addition, the transient genetic activation of p38(MAPK) inhibited IR induction of NF-kappaB gene expression in the absence of indomethacin. Finally, permanently transfected cell lines genetically unable to activate NF-kappaB, because of expression of a dominant negative I-kappaBalpha gene, demonstrated increased sensitivity to IR-induced cytotoxicity. Taken together, these results suggest that p38 MAPK is a target involved in indomethacin-induced radiosensitization and that NF-kappaB may be one downstream target in this process.

Thioredoxin nuclear translocation and interaction with redox factor-1 activates the activator protein-1 transcription factor in response to ionizing radiation.

Thioredoxin (TRX) is a cytoplasmic, redox-sensitive signaling factor believed to participate in the regulation of nuclear transcription factors mediating cellular responses to environmental stress. Activation of the activator protein (AP)-1 transcription factor is thought to be mediated in part by redox-sensitive interactions between the nuclear signaling protein redox factor-1 (Ref-1) and TRX. In this study, the role of TRX and Ref-1 in the activation of the AP-1 complex was examined in HeLa and Jurkat cell lines exposed to ionizing radiation (IR). After exposure to IR, nuclear levels of immunoreactive TRX increased, accompanied by an increase in AP-1 DNA binding activity. It was shown that a physical interaction between Ref-1 and TRX occurs within the nucleus and is enhanced after exposure to IR. Furthermore, TRX immunoprecipitated from irradiated cells was capable of activating AP-1 DNA binding activity in nonirradiated nuclear extracts. In addition, immunodepletion of Ref-1 from nuclear extracts demonstrated that the increase in AP-1 DNA binding activity after IR was also dependent upon the presence of Ref-1 from irradiated cells. Finally, the ability of both TRX and Ref-1 from irradiated cells to stimulate AP-1 DNA binding in nonirradiated nuclear extracts was abolished by chemical oxidation and restored by chemical reduction. These results indicate that, in response to IR, TRX and Ref-1 undergo changes in redox state that contribute to the activation of AP-1 DNA binding activity. These experiments suggest that a redox-sensitive signaling pathway leading from TRX to Ref-1 to the AP-1 complex participates in the up-regulation of DNA binding activity in response to ionizing radiation.