Paediatric eosinophilic oesophagitis: towards early diagnosis and best treatment.

UNLABELLED: Eosinophilic oesophagitis is an emerging disease, well known also in paediatric age, probably caused by both IgE and non-IgE mediated food allergies, diagnosed by upper endoscopy with biopsy. The most severe complication is oesophageal stenosis. The identification of the offending allergens is often difficult; therapy is focused to eliminate the supposed antigenic stimulus, to control the acute symptoms and to induce long-term remission. AIM: We report the clinical outcome and the typical endoscopic findings of children and adolescents affected by eosinophilic oesophagitis, referring a proposal of diagnostic and treatment protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve patients, affected by eosinophilic oesophagitis with a histological diagnosis, underwent radiographic upper gastro-intestinal series, 24 h pH-probe and standardised allergic testing; they were treated with steroids (oral prednisone and swallowed aerosolised fluticasone) and elimination diet. Dilations were performed when eosinophilic oesophagitis was not yet diagnosed, or in patients resistant to conventional treatment. RESULTS: Two patients were lost to follow up (mean follow up: 1 year 11 months); seven patients have no symptoms and normal histology, five of them on restricted diet (without cow's milk protein) and two patients on elemental diet (amino acid formula). In two patients (no allergens identified), mild dysphagia and eosinophilic infiltration persist; one patients underwent Nissen fundoplication for Barrett's oesophagus: he has no symptoms and normal oesophagus, on restricted diet (without cow's milk/eggs protein and wheat). CONCLUSION: The recognition of typical endoscopic picture with careful biopsies extended to the whole oesophagus, even in emergency, could more quickly lead to the correct diagnosis and avoid severe complications of eosinophilic oesophagitis in children, as stricture and failure to growth. Elimination diet is the key of resolution when the allergens are identified. A great challenge remains the relation between gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and eosinophilic oesophagitis, which should however be explained.

Success rate and duration of paediatric outpatient colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: The paediatric colonoscopy completion rates have rarely been reported. AIMS: We sought to evaluate colonoscopy completion rate and compare the rates using colonoscope versus enteroscope. METHODS: We prospectively investigated 60 patients who underwent colonoscopy between July 1999 and June 2001. The following data were collected: demographics, type of endoscope used, extent of colonoscopy, indication for procedure, histology, adverse events and time to reach the caecum and the terminal ileum. RESULTS: Sixty colonoscopies were performed during the study period, 30 with an enteroscope and 30 with a colonoscope. The caecum was reached in 56/60 (93%) and the terminal ileum in 50/60 (83%). An average time of 12.61 min (S.D. 7.3) was necessary to advance the instrument from the anus to the caecum, and additional 3.67 min (S.D. 3.62) to terminal ileum. There was no difference in the success rate between enteroscope and colonoscope. Six patients (10%) had definitive diagnosis established because a full colonoscopy was performed. No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: Paediatric colonoscopy to the caecum can be completed safely and expeditiously in more than 90% of procedures. Various types of instruments do not appear to influence completion rate. Full colonoscopy contributes to the establishment of a definitive diagnosis.

Non-surgical interventions for eosinophilic oesophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with eosinophilic oesophagitis (EO) present with difficulty swallowing, vomiting, regurgitation, chest and/or abdominal pain. People with EO frequently fail to respond to treatment with gastric acid suppressants or anti-reflux surgery. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and harms of medical interventions for eosinophilic oesophagitis. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases Group trials register (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2004), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to February 2004) and EMBASE (1980 to February 2004). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials were included if they compared a medical or dietary intervention for eosinophilic oesophagitis with a placebo or one medical intervention with another medical intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently screened the title of abstracts. MAIN RESULTS: No completed RCTs were found in the published literature. We found one abstract reporting preliminary data from an RCT (not completed) comparing oral prednisolone with topical (swallowed metered dose) fluticasone in children. In this study (50 children enrolled to date) healing rates of oesophagitis and symptom resolution with fluticasone were similar to those with prednisolone. For another ongoing RCT, comparing the efficacy of swallowed fluticasone with placebo for eosinophilic oesophagitis in males and females aged 3 to 21 years no results are available. REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: The lack of completed RCT's makes it impossible to compare the relative benefits and harms of the wide range of medical interventions currently used for treating EO. Published case series suggest that an elemental diet, oral steroids and topical steroids all offer some benefits. However, lack of a comparison group in these studies makes it impossible to evaluate the effect of these interventions.

Failure of single-toxin assays to detect clostridium difficile infection in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this retrospective study were 1) to determine the ability of single-toxin assays for Clostridium difficile to detect infection among pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and 2) to determine the toxin assays routinely used by pediatric tertiary care hospitals in the United States. METHODS: Stool specimens from patients with IBD (submitted from January, 1996, to August, 1999) were evaluated for the presence of C. difficile toxin A and toxin B. Toxin profile (toxin A alone, toxin B alone, toxin A and B together) was compared in positive specimens. A phone interview was conducted with representatives from laboratories in 22 pediatric hospitals to investigate which toxin assays were routinely used. RESULTS: A total of 697 specimens were submitted from 284 IBD patients. In all, 81 IBD patients (28.5%) had at least one documented infection. Toxin A assay failed to identify 41.5% of C. difficile infections. Toxin B assay failed to detect 34.9% of C. difficile infections. Toxin profile changed in 55% of patients with multiple infections. Of the hospitals surveyed, 59% did not test for both toxins. CONCLUSIONS: Single-toxin assays for C. difficile fail to detect a significant percentage of infections. The toxins identified during one infection are not predictive of the toxins identified in subsequent infections. Despite this, many pediatric hospitals do not routinely use both toxin assays to diagnose C. difficile infection. When infection is suspected, assays for C. difficile toxin A and toxin B should be requested.

Eosinophilic esophagitis: A subset of eosinophilic gastroenteritis.

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EG) was first described over 50 years ago. Despite its long history, it remains an ill-defined and poorly understood entity. EG can present in a number of ways, none of which are exclusive to the disorder. EG has features of allergy and immune dysregulation but does not clearly fit into the category of allergic or immune disorder. While EG has been reported to affect all locations and layers of the gastrointestinal tract, the vast majority of reported cases have demonstrated mucosal involvement of the gastric antrum and small intestine in addition to disease activity of other locations of the gastrointestinal tract. Recently, several reports have identified a disease consisting of an isolated esophageal eosinophilia. Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE), also known as primary eosinophilic esophagitis or idiopathic eosinophilic esophagitis, occurs in adults and in children and represents a subset of EG with an isolated severe esophageal eosinophilia. Patients with EE present with symptoms similar to those of gastroesophageal reflux but are unresponsive to antireflux medication. Reports have demonstrated that patients with EE respond to either dietary restriction or corticosteroids.