Confirmation of linkage of prostate cancer aggressiveness with chromosome 19q.

Regions on chromosomes 7 and 19 were recently reported to contain susceptibility loci that regulate tumor aggressiveness of prostate cancer. To confirm these findings, we analyzed genome scan data from 161 pedigrees affected with prostate cancer. Using the Gleason score as a quantitative measure of tumor aggressiveness, we regressed the squared trait difference, as well as the mean-corrected cross product, on the estimated proportion of alleles shared identical-by-descent at each marker position. Our results confirm the previous linkage results for chromosome 19q (D19S902, P<.00001). In addition, we report suggestive evidence for linkage on chromosome 4 (D4S403, P=.00012). The results of previous findings, together with our results, provide strong evidence that chromosome 19 harbors a gene for tumor aggressiveness.

Role of HPC2/ELAC2 in hereditary prostate cancer.

The HPC2/ELAC2 gene on chromosome 17p was recently identified as a candidate gene for hereditary prostate cancer (HPC). To confirm these findings, we screened 300 prostate cancer patients (2 affected members/family) from 150 families with HPC for potential germ-line mutations using conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis, followed by direct sequence analysis. The minimum criteria for our families with HPC was the presence of 3 affected men with prostate cancer. A total of 23 variants were identified, including 13 intronic and 10 exonic changes. Of the 10 exonic changes, 1 truncating mutation was identified, a Glu216Stop nonsense mutation. This nonsense variant was found in 2 of 3 affected men in a single family. The remaining nine alterations included five missense, three silent, and one variant in the 3' untranslated region. To additionally test for potential associations of polymorphic variants and increased risk for disease, we genotyped two common polymorphisms, Ser217Leu and Ala541Thr, in 446 prostate cancer patients from 164 families with HPC and 502 population-based controls. The frequency of the Leu217 variant was similar for patients (32.3%) and controls (31.8%), as was the frequency of the Thr541 variant (5.4% among patients versus 5.2% among controls). In contrast to previous reports, we found no association of the joint effects of Leu271 and Thr541 (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-1.89). Overall, our results did not reveal any association between these two common polymorphisms and the risk for HPC. The finding of a nonsense mutation in the HPC2/ELAC2 gene confirms its potential role in genetic susceptibility to prostate cancer. However, our data also suggest that germ-line mutations of the HPC2/ELAC2 are rare in HPC and that the variants Leu217 and Thr541 do not appear to influence the risk for HPC. Cumulatively, these results suggest that alterations within the HPC2/ELAC2 gene play a limited role in genetic susceptibility to HPC.

Computer analysis of intraoperative cardiac rhythms using esophageal and surface leads.

Esophageal ECG lead and computer as arrhythmia monitor were elevated in 6 dogs and 23 patients. In dogs arrhythmias were induced by an epinephrine infusion during halothane anesthesia. The computer identified 1858 irregular beats, a cardiologist 2130. Bigeminy was correctly identified 82% of the time, trigeminy 72%, couplets 29%, and ventricular tachycardia 45%. The false positive rate was .03%. In the operating room the monitor identified an average of 44 abnormal beats per patient. In 5 patients junctional rhythm was correctly identified. This study shows the feasibility of using an esophageal ECG lead for computerized ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmia monitoring in the operating room.