Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 93
Filter
1.
Eye (Lond) ; 2024 Jun 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38844584

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the changing trends in barriers towards accessing eye care in a rural population cohort from Southern India. METHODS: This is a population-based longitudinal cohort of participants (the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease study [APEDS]) from three rural regions of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh who were evaluated at baseline (APEDS I; 1996-2000), along with follow-ups at 10 years (APEDS II; 2009-10) and 15 years (APEDS III; 2012-2016). At follow-up, all participants 30 years and above were administered a structured questionnaire on barriers to uptake of eye care services. RESULTS: Of 3810 participants, 1449 had visual impairment (VI). Among them, 1302 noticed a reduction in vision over last five years and 722 sought treatment, a significant improvement from baseline (P < 0.001). Participants were more likely to seek treatment if they were educated (OR = 1.43, 95%CI: 1.07-1.89), had hypertension (OR = 1.36, 95%CI: 1.04-1.77), had VI from causes other than cataract and refractive error (OR = 2.49, 95%CI: 1.56-3.99) and were residents of Adilabad (OR = 2.21; 95%CI: 1.58-3.08) and Mahbubnagar (OR = 3.55; 95%CI: 2.48-5.08) districts. Those with moderate or worse VI were less likely to seek treatment (moderate VI: OR = 0.56; 95%CI: 0.42-0.75, severe VI: OR = 0.34; 95%CI: 0.19-0.57, blindness: OR = 0.38; 95%CI: 0.2-0.73). The most important barriers to uptake of services were, not perceiving loss of vision as a serious problem (25.9%), accepting it an aging process (21.4%) or due to economic reasons (16.0%). CONCLUSION: Personal and economic elements accounted for considerable amounts of barriers for utilization of eye care services. The uptake of services could be improved by addressing these specific barriers and risk factors for non-compliance.

2.
BMJ Open ; 14(5): e080973, 2024 May 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38806424

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To report the prevalence and risk factors for the fear of falling (FOF) among older individuals living in residential care facilities in India. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Homes for the aged centres in Hyderabad, India. PARTICIPANTS: The study included individuals aged ≥60 years from homes for the aged centres. The participants underwent a comprehensive eye examination in make-shift clinics setup in homes. Trained investigators collected the personal and demographic information of the participants and administered the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Hearing Handicap Inventory for Elderly questionnaire in the vernacular language. FOF was assessed using the Short Falls Efficacy Scale. The presence of hearing and visual impairment in the same individual was considered dual sensory impairment (DSI). A multiple logistic regression analysis was done to assess the factors associated with FOF. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: FOF. RESULTS: In total, 867 participants were included from 41 homes for the aged centres in the analyses. The mean (±SD) age of the participants was 74.2 (±8.3) years (range 60-96 years). The prevalence of FOF was 56.1% (95% CI 52.7% to 59.4%; n=486). The multivariate analysis showed that those with DSI had eleven times higher odds of reporting FOF than those with no impairment (OR 11.14; 95% CI 3.15 to 41.4.) Similarly, those with moderate depression had seven times higher odds (OR 6.85; 95% CI 3.70 to 12.70), and those with severe depression had eight times higher odds (OR 8.13; 95% CI 3.50 to 18.90) of reporting FOF. A history of falls in the last year was also associated with increased odds for FOF (OR 1.52; 95% CI 1.03 to 2.26). CONCLUSION: FOF is common among older individuals in residential care in India. Depression, falling in the previous year and DSI were strongly associated with FOF. A cross-disciplinary approach may be required to address FOF among the older people in residential care in India.


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls , Fear , Homes for the Aged , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , India/epidemiology , Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Male , Female , Fear/psychology , Aged, 80 and over , Prevalence , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Vision Disorders/epidemiology , Vision Disorders/psychology , Logistic Models , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
BMJ Open ; 14(5): e083199, 2024 May 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38816051

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence, causes and risk factors associated with visual impairment (VI) in the Nirmal district of Telangana, India, using extended Rapid Assessment of Visual Impairment (RAVI) methodology. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Community setting. PARTICIPANTS: Participants aged ≥16 years were enumerated from 90 randomly selected clusters and 4629/5400 (85.7%) participants were examined. Presenting visual acuity (VA) was assessed using a Snellen chart with E optotypes at a 6 m distance. Near vision was assessed binocularly using an N notation chart with tumbling E optotypes at a 40 cm distance. An anterior segment examination done followed by distance direct ophthalmoscopy at 50 cm. Non-mydriatic fundus images were obtained. VI was defined as presenting VA worse than 6/12 in the better eye. The prevalence of VI in the current study was compared with a RAVI study conducted in 2014 to assess the trends in VI among those aged ≥40 years. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Prevalence, causes and risk factors for VI. RESULTS: Among those examined, 55% were women, 53% had at least school-level education, 2.3% self-reported diabetes and 8.7% self-reported hypertension. The prevalence of VI was 8.81% (95% CI 8.01% to 9.67%). Overall, uncorrected refractive errors (49.5%) were the leading cause of VI, followed by cataracts (40.2%) and posterior segment diseases (4.9%). Among those aged ≥40 years, the prevalence of VI declined by 19.3% compared with the 2014 baseline study (from 20.2% to 16.3%; p<0.01). CONCLUSION: The extended RAVI study conducted in the Nirmal district showed a considerable decline in the prevalence of VI. Targeted interventions are needed to provide adequate eye care for the high-risk groups in this district.


Subject(s)
Visual Acuity , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , India/epidemiology , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Adult , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Aged , Young Adult , Adolescent , Vision Disorders/epidemiology , Cataract/epidemiology
4.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0303401, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38743737

ABSTRACT

AIM: To investigate the barriers to the uptake of referral services from secondary care centers (SC) to a higher-level tertiary care center (TC) in Southern India. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Mahabubnagar district of Telangana, India, between February 1, 2018 to January 31, 2019 and all those referred from SC to TC between January 1, 2013 to December 30, 2016 were identified for interview. Based on inclusion criteria, of the 960 participants identified, 681 (70.9%) participated in the study. A validated study questionnaire was administered to all participants. Information collected were the demographic details, details related to their referral and barriers to referral. The participants that presented at TC were considered compliant and who did not, were non-compliant. Reasons for non-compliance was also collected. RESULTS: The mean age those interviewed was 46.1 years (SD: 17.3 years) and 429 (63%) were males and 252 (37%) were females. Overall, 516 (75.8%) were compliant, and 165 (24.2%) were non-compliant. The major factors for non-compliance were economic (16.4%) and attitudinal (44.2%) barriers. Within the attitudinal barrier category, the most prevalent individual attitudinal barriers were 'too busy to go to the eye center for treatment (16.4%)'and 'able to manage routine daily activities with current vision (12.1%)'. The multivariable analysis showed that the non-compliant participants had only visited the SC once prior to the referral (odds ratio: 2.82; 95% CI: 1.43-5.57) (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Participants with only one SC visit, were less likely to comply with referrals and the major barriers to compliance were economical and attitudinal. It is important to address these specific barriers to provide proper counseling to participants during referrals.


Subject(s)
Referral and Consultation , Humans , Male , Female , India , Cross-Sectional Studies , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Adult , Tertiary Care Centers , Secondary Care , Surveys and Questionnaires , Eye Diseases/therapy , Aged , Tertiary Healthcare
5.
Ophthalmic Epidemiol ; : 1-7, 2024 Apr 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38569085

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To report cataract surgical coverage (CSC) and effective Cataract Surgical Coverage (eCSC) from four districts in Telangana, India. METHODS: Individuals aged ≥40 years were recruited from Adilabad, Mahbubnagar, Warangal and Khammam districts using two stage cluster sampling methodology. All participants had detailed eye examinations including visual acuity assessment using a standard Snellen chart at a distance of six meters, anterior segment examination and fundus imaging by trained professionals. CSC and eCSC were calculated for persons using a 6/12 visual acuity cut-off. RESULTS: Of 12,150 individuals enumerated from four districts 11,238 (92.5%) were examined. The mean (standard deviation) age of the participants was 54.1 (±11.2) years (range: 40 to 102 years) and 54.6% (n = 6137) were women. Overall, the CSC (%) was 54.2%. It ranged from a highest of 59% in Khammam followed by 57.5% in Adilabad, 51.7% in Warangal, and a least of 49.7% in Mahbubnagar district. Overall, the eCSC (%) was 39.9%. It ranged from a highest of 46.1% in Adilabad followed by 43.2% in Khammam, 36.2% in Warangal district and a least of 35.8% in the Mahbubnagar district. CONCLUSIONS: CSC and eCSC varied across the districts. A significant gap between CSC and eCSC is noted suggestive of challenges with quality of services. District-wise planning of cataract surgical services with a focus on quality care is recommended to improve coverage and contribute towards achieving the goal of universal eye health coverage in the Telangana State in India.

6.
Clin Exp Optom ; : 1-6, 2024 Apr 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38616051

ABSTRACT

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Near Vision Impairment (NVI) is common in developing countries. A substantial proportion of NVI can be addressed by providing spectacles. Innovative eye care programmes are needed to address NVI. Population-based epidemiological studies can provide vital data to plan such eye care service delivery models. BACKGROUND: To report the prevalence of NVI and effective Refractive Error Coverage (eREC) for near vision in West Godavari and Krishna districts in Andhra Pradesh, south India. METHODS: A population-based cross-sectional study was carried out using a Rapid Assessment of Visual Impairment methodology. Presenting and pinhole distance visual acuity were assessed followed by near vision assessment using a N notation chart at a fixed distance of 40 cm. If the presenting near vision was worse than N8, the best corrected near visual acuity was recorded with age appropriate near vision correction. NVI was defined as presenting near vision worse than N8 among those without distance vision impairment (6/18 or better in the better eye). Effective Refractive Error Coverage for near was calculated as the proportion of individuals with an adequate correction to the total participants, including those with inadequate, adequate, and no correction for near vision. RESULTS: Data of 2,228 participants aged ≥40 years were analysed. The mean age of these participants was 54.0 ± 10.4 years; 53.8% were women; 44.5% had no formal education. The prevalence of NVI was 27.1% (95% CI: 25.2-29.0%). NVI significantly associated with 70 and above age group (adjusted OR: 1.97; 95% CI: 1.45-3.70). Participants with formal education had lower odds for NVI (adjusted OR: 0.75; 95 % CI: 0.68-0.83). The eREC for near vision was 48.0%. CONCLUSION: NVI affects over a quarter of people aged ≥40 years in the West Godavari and Krishna districts of Andhra Pradesh. However, eREC is under 50% and there is scope for improving this by establishing eye care services to achieve universal eye health for all.

7.
Clin Exp Optom ; : 1-5, 2024 Apr 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38594023

ABSTRACT

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Understanding the awareness level of diabetes and diabetes-related eye diseases will help in developing better eye health education programmes and improve health-seeking behaviour in the community. BACKGROUND: Diabetes and diabetes related eye diseases are increasing in numbers both in urban and rural areas in India. There are limited data on awareness of diabetes and diabetes-related eye disease in rural communities of India. This study reports on awareness of diabetes and diabetes-related eye diseases in people aged ≥40 years from two rural districts of Telangana, India. METHODS: A structured questionnaire was used to determine the awareness of diabetes and diabetes-related eye diseases among participants aged ≥40 years in the Khammam and Warangal districts of Telangana, India. Social investigators visited the participant's households and conducted the interviews. A positive response to a question on having heard about diabetes was considered as 'awareness'. For those aware, follow-up questions were asked about the effect of diabetes on vision, frequency of eye examination and source of information. A positive response on a question that diabetes could cause loss of vision was considered as awareness of diabetic eye disease. RESULTS: A total of 3273 participants were interviewed. Among them, 56.2% (n = 1840) were women, 60.6% (n = 1985) had no formal education, and 50.2% (n = 1645) were from the Khammam district. The mean age of the participants was 55.3 years (standard deviation: 11.7 years). Awareness of diabetes was 52.5% (n = 1719). Among them, 1056 participants (61.4%) were aware that diabetes could affect vision. CONCLUSION: Only half of the participants were aware of diabetes and of this substantial proportion of individuals was unaware of potential vision loss due to diabetes. Improving awareness about diabetes and its impact on vision is recommended to prevent potential vision loss in this population.

8.
Eye (Lond) ; 2024 Mar 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38438796

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Uncorrected refractive error (URE) is one of the leading causes of childhood vision impairment. Increasing effective refractive error coverage (e-REC) is one of the main indicators of WHO's 2030 global eye health targets. The aim of this study is to estimate the e-REC and spectacle coverage among school children in Telangana, South India. METHODS: School children aged 4-15 years in the study locations underwent vision screening using 6/12 tumbling E optotype by trained community eye health workers in the schools. Those failing the initial vision screening and/or found to be having eye conditions were referred to a nearby referral centre appropriately, where they underwent detailed eye examination. RESULTS: A total of 774,184 children were screened in schools of which 51.49% were boys. The mean age was 9.40 ± 3.27 years. The prevalence of URE was 1.44% (95%CI:1.41-1.46) of which myopia was 1.38% (95%CI: 1.35-1.41). In multivariate analysis, the risk of myopia was higher among older children (Adj.OR: 17.04; 95%CI: 14.64-19.85), those residing in urban areas (Adj.OR:3.05, 95%CI:2.60-3.57), those with disabilities (Adj.OR:2.61, 95%CI:2.00-3.39) and among girls (Adj.OR:1.30, 95%CI:1.25-1.35) (P < 0.001). The overall e-REC was 56.97% and the spectacle coverage was 62.83%. CONCLUSION: The need for interventions to improve e-REC to achieve 2030 global eye health target is eminent among children in this region. Improving refractive services through school eye health programs could aid in accelerating this process to achieve the target. Myopia being the most common type of RE, the risk factors included increasing age, urban location, and presence of disability.

9.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 72(2): 264-269, 2024 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38099374

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The World Report on Vision highlights that health information systems (HIS) should collect information on the determinants of eye conditions and vision impairment (VI) as a step toward integrated people-centered eye care (IPEC). Thus, this retrospective study aims to elucidate VI trends across age and gender of the patients who visited our centres in southern and eastern India. METHODS: Electronic medical records of all new patients who visited the network were included. VI was defined as visual acuity less than 6/12; unilateral VI was based on the worse presenting eye (the other eye being normal), and bilateral VI was based on the better eye. "Total VI" includes both unilateral and bilateral VI. RESULTS: The records of 7,31,307 patients from January to December 2019 were extracted. Males were 54%. The mean age was 40 years (SD: 19.16 years). The majority of patients (46.54%) visited a primary care centre. Centres in Andhra Pradesh saw the largest number of patients (46%). Approximately 65% of all patients presented had no VI in either eye. Total VI was 23.5% at the primary-centre level and approximately 45% at other levels, the highest being in Odisha. More females accessed care at primary and secondary centres (46.6%) than at higher levels of care (44%). Odisha had the lowest number of females accessing care (43.01%). CONCLUSION: Non-visually impairing conditions form an important reason for patients visiting our eye care facilities. Strategies focusing on improving access to eye care for females should be planned at all levels, especially in Odisha.


Subject(s)
Blindness , Vision Disorders , Male , Female , Humans , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Visual Acuity , India/epidemiology , Prevalence
10.
Eye (Lond) ; 2023 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37968514

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To report 15-year incidence rate of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) in the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study (APEDS). METHODS: A population-based longitudinal study was carried out at three rural study sites. Phakic participants aged ≥40 years who participated at baseline (APEDS I) and the mean 15-year follow-up visit (APEDS III) were included. A comprehensive ophthalmic examination was performed on all participants. Mean intraocular pressure (IOP) was average of IOPs of right and left eyes. The definition of glaucoma was based on the International Society of Geographical and Epidemiological Ophthalmology (ISGEO) classification. The main outcome measure was incidence of POAG during the follow-up period in participants without glaucoma or suspicion of glaucoma at baseline. RESULTS: Data from the available and eligible participants from the original cohort (1241/2790; 44.4%) were analysed. The mean age (standard deviation) of participants at baseline was 50.2 (8.1) years; 580 (46.7%) were men. Thirty-six participants developed POAG [bilateral in 17 (47.2%)] over 15 years. The incidence rate of POAG per 100-person years (95% confidence interval) was 2.83 (2.6, 3.08). Compared to baseline, the reduction in mean IOP [median (range) mm Hg] was -0.75 (-7.5, 9) in participants with incident POAG and -2.5 (-14.5, 14.5) in those without. The inter-visit difference in mean IOP was a significant risk factor on logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSION: We report the long-term incidence of POAG in rural India. A longitudinal change in IOP, specifically a less pronounced reduction in IOP with increasing age, was a novel risk factor.

11.
Eye (Lond) ; 2023 Oct 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37875702

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of visual impairment (VI), uncorrected refractive errors (URE), and effective refractive error coverage among individuals aged 15-50 years in Koshi Province, Nepal. METHODS: A population-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Koshi Province in which 4800 participants were selected from 80 clusters. The study teams visited the selected households and conducted eye examinations. This included monocular unaided (and aided) visual acuity assessment using a Snellen chart with tumbling E optotypes at a distance of 6 meters. Near vision was assessed binocularly using the N notation chart at a fixed distance of 40 cm for each individual. Torchlight examination and distance direct ophthalmoscopy was done. VI was defined as presenting visual acuity worse than 6/12 in the better eye. URE was defined as presenting visual acuity worse than 6/12 and improving to 6/12 or better on using a pinhole. Near Vision Impairment was defined as binocular presenting near vision worse than N8 among those age 35 years and older. RESULTS: In total, 4057 were examined (84.5% response rate). The prevalence of VI was 3.52% (95% CI:2.89-4.13; n = 143). The prevalence of URE in the better eye was 1.95% (95% CI:1.54-2.42; n = 79). The Refractive Error Coverage and Effective Refractive Error Coverage were 34.8% and 31.3% respectively. The prevalence of NVI was 34.24% (95% CI: 32.1-36.40; n = 666). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of VI and  URE was low, attributed to the availability and uptake of services in Koshi province in Nepal.

12.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 71(10): 3322-3327, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37787229

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Undetected vision impairment (VI) could negatively affect the overall development in children. School vision screening program is a viable and cost-effective approach for the early identification and management of VI. Aim: This study aims to estimate the prevalence of VI, its risk factors, and ocular morbidity among school children in Telangana, South India. Methods: Children aged 4-15 years attending schools in the study area were screened in this study. The vision screenings were performed in schools by trained community eye health workers using 6/12 tumbling E optotypes. Children who failed the test and/or presented with other eye conditions were referred to vision centers or secondary and tertiary eye care centers. A comprehensive eye examination was conducted in these centers, including cycloplegic refraction and fundus examination. Results: A total of 774,184 children, with a mean age of 9.4 ± 3.27 years, were screened. Overall, 51.49% (N = 398,596) were male. In total, 4.33% [N = 33,528; 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.29-4.38] required referral services, while 1.16% (N = 9,002) had a presenting visual acuity of < 6/12. Multivariate analysis showed a high risk of VI among older children [Adj. odds ratio (OR): 5.75; 95% CI: 5.18-6.38], those with disabilities (Adj. OR: 5.12; 95% CI: 4.14-6.33), female gender (Adj. OR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.24 - 1.35), and those residing in the urban areas (Adj. OR: 2.87; 95% CI: 2.42-3.39). The main cause of VI was uncorrected refractive errors (74.14%). Conclusion: The prevalence of VI among school children was 1.16% in Telangana, South India, and refractive error was the leading cause of VI among this population. Increasing age, urban location, female gender and other disabilities increase the risk of VI among children.


Subject(s)
Refractive Errors , Vision Screening , Humans , Male , Child , Female , Adolescent , Prevalence , Rural Population , Visual Acuity , Refractive Errors/epidemiology , Refractive Errors/diagnosis , India/epidemiology , Vision Disorders/diagnosis , Vision Disorders/epidemiology
13.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 71(7): 2850-2855, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37417133

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To document the spectrum and magnitude of eye disorders and visual impairment in the Dongaria-a Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group in the Rayagada district of Odisha, India. Methods: A door-to-door screening protocol included a record of basic health parameters, visual acuity for distance, and near and flashlight examination of the eyes. Spectacles were dispensed to those who improved; those who failed the screening were referred to fixed (primary and secondary) eye care centers. Results: We examined 89% (n = 9872/11,085) of people who consented for screening. The mean age was 25.5 ± 18.8 years; 55% (n = 5391) were female; 13.8% (n = 1361) were under-five children, and 39% (n = 3884) were 6 to 16 years. 86% (n = 8515) were illiterate. 12.4% (n = 1224) were visually impaired, of which 9.9% had early moderate VI, and 2.5% had severe VI and blindness. Uncorrected refractive error was detected in 7.5% (n = 744) and cataracts in 7.6% (n = 754); among the adults, 41.5% (n = 924/2227) had presbyopia. In children, 20% (n = 790) had vitamin A deficiency, 17% (n = 234) had global acute malnutrition, and 18% (n = 244) were stunted for their age. Almost two-thirds (62%, n = 6144) confirmed habitual intake of alcohol, and 4% (n = 389) of adults had essential hypertension. Following the screening, 43.5% (n = 837) of referred patients reported to the fixed centers, and 55% (134/243) of people advised underwent cataract surgery. Spectacles were dispensed to 1496 individuals. Conclusion: Visual impairment and malnutrition are high in Dongaria indigenous community. Permanent health facilities and advocacy would improve this community's health and health-seeking behavior.


Subject(s)
Cataract , Refractive Errors , Vision, Low , Adult , Child , Humans , Female , Adolescent , Young Adult , Male , Prevalence , Vision, Low/diagnosis , Vision, Low/epidemiology , Vision, Low/etiology , Blindness/diagnosis , Blindness/epidemiology , Blindness/etiology , Refractive Errors/complications , Refractive Errors/diagnosis , Refractive Errors/epidemiology , Visual Acuity , Cataract/complications
15.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 8858, 2023 05 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37258536

ABSTRACT

Timely identification of individuals "at-risk" for myopia progression is the leading requisite for myopia practice as it aids in the decision of appropriate management. This study aimed to develop 'myopia progression risk assessment score' (MPRAS) based on multiple risk factors (10) to determine whether a myope is "at-risk" or "low-risk" for myopia progression. Two risk-score models (model-1: non-weightage, model-2: weightage) were developed. Ability of MPRAS to diagnose individual "at-risk" for myopia progression was compared against decision of five clinicians in 149 myopes, aged 6-29 years. Using model-1 (no-weightage), further 7 sub-models were created with varying number of risk factors in decreasing step-wise manner (1a: 10 factors to 1g: 4 factors). In random eye analysis for model-1, the highest Youden's J-index (0.63-0.65) led to the MPRAS cut-off score of 41.50-43.50 for 5 clinicians with a sensitivity ranging from 78 to 85% and specificity ranging from 79 to 87%. For this cut-off score, the mean area under the curve (AUC) between clinicians and the MPRAS model ranged from 0.89 to 0.90. Model-2 (weighted for few risk-factors) provided similar sensitivity, specificity, and AUC. Sub-model analysis revealed greater AUC with high sensitivity (89%) and specificity (94%) in model-1g that has 4 risk factors compared to other sub-models (1a-1f). All the MPRAS models showed good agreement with the clinician's decision in identifying individuals "at-risk" for myopia progression.


Subject(s)
Myopia , Humans , Myopia/diagnosis , Risk Factors , Risk Assessment
16.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 71(3): 902-908, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36872706

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To assess the incidence, visual impairment, and blindness due to retinitis pigmentosa (RP) in a rural southern Indian cohort. Methods: This is a population-based longitudinal cohort study of participants with RP from the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study (APEDS) cohorts I and III, respectively. The study included participants with RP of APEDS I who were followed until APEDS III. Their demographic data along with ocular features, fundus photographs, and visual fields (Humphrey) were collected. Descriptive statistics using mean ± standard deviation with interquartile range (IQR) were calculated. The main outcome measures were RP incidence, visual impairment, and blindness as per the World Health Organization (WHO) definitions. Results: At baseline (APEDS I), 7771 participants residing in three rural areas were examined. There were nine participants with RP with a mean age at baseline of 47.33 ± 10.89 years (IQR: 39-55). There was a male preponderance (6:3), and the mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 18 eyes from nine participants with RP was 1.2 ± 0.72 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; IQR: 0.7-1.6). Over a mean follow-up duration of 15 years, 5395/7771 (69.4%) were re-examined, which included seven RP participants from APEDS 1. Additionally, two new participants with RP were identified; so, the overall incidence was 370/ million in 15 years (24.7/million per year). The mean BCVA of 14 eyes of seven participants with RP who were re-examined in APEDS III was 2.17 ± 0.56 logMAR (IQR: 1.8-2.6), and five of these seven participants with RP developed incident blindness during the follow-up period. Conclusion: RP is a prevalent disease in southern India that warrants appropriate strategies to prevent this condition.


Subject(s)
Retinitis Pigmentosa , Vision, Low , Male , Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Follow-Up Studies , Longitudinal Studies , Blindness , India
17.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 71(1): 263-267, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36588247

ABSTRACT

Purpose: This study was conducted to report on the pattern of spectacles use and compliance among the elderly (aged ≥60 years) in homes for the aged in Hyderabad region in Telangana State, India. Methods: Participants were recruited from 41 homes for the aged centres for comprehensive eye health assessments. A questionnaire was used to collect information on current and past use of spectacles, type of spectacles, spectacles provider and amount paid for the spectacles. For those that reported using spectacles in the past, information was collected on the reasons for their discontinuation. Compliance with spectacles use was assessed after eight months of provision of the spectacles. Results: A total of 1182/1513 participants were examined from 41 homes for the aged in Hyderabad, India. The mean age of the participants examined was 75 years (standard deviation (SD): 8.8 years; range: 60-108 years); 764 (64.6%) of them were women and 240 participants (20.3%) had no formal education. The prevalence of spectacles use was 69.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 67.1-72.4; n = 825). Bifocals were the most commonly used type of spectacles (86.7%) followed by single vision glasses for distance vision (7.4%). Private eye clinics were the largest service provider (85.5%) followed by local optical outlets (6.9%) and other service providers (7.7%). The prevalence of spectacles compliance was 81.5% (211/259). Conclusion: Use of spectacles and compliance are high among the elderly living in residential care homes in the Hyderabad region. Spectacles use can be further improved by periodic eye assessments along the lines similar to school eye programs, which can immensely benefit this vulnerable, aged population.


Subject(s)
Refractive Errors , Aged , Humans , Female , Male , Prevalence , Refractive Errors/epidemiology , Refractive Errors/therapy , Visual Acuity , Eyeglasses , Homes for the Aged , Morbidity , India/epidemiology
19.
Br J Ophthalmol ; 107(8): 1184-1189, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35365490

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To report on the barriers to uptake of eye care services after referral in the elderly in 'homes for the aged' in Hyderabad, India. METHODS: Individuals aged ≥60 years were recruited from 41 'homes for the aged' and were examined in the 'make-shift' clinics in homes. All participants who had vision impairment or needed further eye examination other than spectacles were referred to the higher centres for 'free services'. Three months after the referral, the participants were interviewed and asked about the uptake of services, and their reasons for not attending. RESULTS: In all, 731/1182 (61.8%) participants were referred of which 375 (49.9%) attended. In multiple logistic regression, participants aged ≥80 years were less likely to utilise the services (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.03). Similarly, the participants living in free homes (OR 3.53; 95% CI 2.15 to 5.79) and subsidised homes (OR 2.24: 95% CI 1.55 to 3.23) and those independently mobile had higher odds for uptake of services (OR 5.74; 95% CI 3.31 to 10.51). The major reasons for not availing the referral services were 'lack of felt need' reported by 136 (45.4%) participants followed by other health issues in 100 (33.4%) participants and non-consenting family members in 49 (16.4%) participants. In all, 14 (4.7%) participants gave other reasons. CONCLUSIONS: The uptake of eye care services in the elderly in residential care remains poor despite the provision of services for free. Lack of felt need for services is the main reason for non-compliance to the referral for care. Counselling on the benefit of interventions could potentially improve referral compliance in this population.


Subject(s)
Eye , Vision, Ocular , Aged , Humans , Referral and Consultation , Morbidity , India/epidemiology
20.
Eye (Lond) ; 37(8): 1725-1731, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36104520

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: To report the impact of interventions for avoidable vision impairment (VI) on the visual function of elderly residents in 'homes for the aged' in India. METHODS: Participants aged ≥60 years were recruited. A comprehensive eye examination was conducted by trained examiners and interventions were provided. Trained social investigators administered the Indian Vision Function questionnaire (INDVFQ) to assess visual function before and after the intervention (spectacles, cataract surgery or laser capsulotomy). Lower scores on IVFQ imply better visual function. VI was defined as presenting visual acuity worse than 6/18 in the better eye. VI due to cataract, uncorrected refractive errors, and posterior capsular opacification after cataract surgery were considered avoidable VI. RESULTS: The mean age of the participants (n = 613) was 73.8 years (standard deviation: 8.1 years) and 378 (62.2%) were women. 64/103 (62.1%) participants who had avoidable VI at baseline were evaluated after the intervention. Significant gains were observed in all four domains of visual function. There was a 14.9% improvement in mobility scores (33.8 versus 28.8; p = 0.03), a 19.9% improvement in the activity limitations score (36.8 versus 29.5; p < 0.01), a 10.9% improvement in the psychosocial impact score (41.1 versus 36.6; p < 0.01) and a 13.6% improvement in the visual symptoms score (49.2 versus 42.5 p < 0.01). Overall, the mean IVFQ score improved by 16.4% (47.6 versus 39.8; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Elderly individuals in residential care with avoidable VI had a significant improvement in visual function after relatively low-cost interventions such as spectacles and cataract surgery. Strategies are needed to provide these interventions for the elderly in 'homes for the aged' in India.


Subject(s)
Capsule Opacification , Cataract Extraction , Cataract , Refractive Errors , Aged , Humans , Female , Male , Vision Disorders/epidemiology , Vision Disorders/diagnosis , Cataract/complications , Refractive Errors/therapy , Refractive Errors/diagnosis , Morbidity , India/epidemiology , Prevalence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...