Development and evaluation of the Acromegaly Symptom Diary.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are important to consider when evaluating treatments, yet there are no PRO measures for patients with acromegaly that have been developed in accordance with US Food and Drug Administration guidance. Acromegaly is a rare, chronic condition caused by hypersecretion of growth hormone. Disease activity is monitored by measurement in serum of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-I. The objectives of this research were to develop the Acromegaly Symptom Diary (ASD), establish a scoring algorithm, and evaluate the psychometric measurement properties of the ASD. METHODS: Semistructured interviews consisting of concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing components were conducted with 16 adult participants with acromegaly. The concept elicitation component identified symptoms important to individuals with acromegaly. The cognitive debriefing component gathered information about the participants' experience with each proposed item of the ASD, their thought process for answering each question, and their interpretation of the items. The psychometric properties of the draft ASD were then evaluated using data from the ACROBAT Evolve (NCT03792555; n = 13) and ACROBAT Edge (NCT03789656; n = 47) clinical trials. RESULTS: The 16 participants from the interviews described ongoing symptoms, with the most frequently reported being joint pain (n = 13) and fatigue (n = 12), followed by swelling (n = 8), headache (n = 7), and mood swings (n = 6), and were able to interpret and understand the ASD items and had no issues with the 24-hour recall period. From data collected in the clinical studies, the psychometric properties of internal consistency (0.91 - 0.80), test-retest reliability with item-level and total ASD scores (> 0.70), baseline construct validity (r ≥ |0.38|) across scales, and responsiveness to change (r = 0.52-0.56) were supported for the ASD. The proposed preliminary threshold range to characterize a meaningful change from the patients' perspective for the ASD total is a 4- to 6-point change for improvement or worsening out of a total score of 70. CONCLUSION: These findings provide qualitative and quantitative evidence to support the ASD as fit for the purpose of evaluating the symptom experience of patients with acromegaly in clinical trials.

ACROBAT Edge: Safety and Efficacy of Switching Injected SRLs to Oral Paltusotine in Patients With Acromegaly.

CONTEXT: Paltusotine is a once-daily, oral, nonpeptide small-molecule somatostatin receptor type 2 (SST2) agonist in clinical development for treatment of acromegaly. OBJECTIVE: This work aimed to evaluate change in insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels in patients switched from octreotide long-acting release or lanreotide depot monotherapy to paltusotine. METHODS: A phase 2, open-label, prospective, multicenter, multinational, nonrandomized, single-arm exploratory study was conducted in which dosage uptitrations were performed in a double-blinded manner. At 26 global sites, patients with acromegaly switched to paltusotine from injected somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL)-based therapy. Patients received 13-week treatment with once-daily oral paltusotine (10-40 mg/d). The primary end point was change from baseline to week 13 in IGF-I for patients who switched from long-acting octreotide or lanreotide depot monotherapy to paltusotine (group 1). All patients underwent a 4-week paltusotine washout at end of treatment period (wk 13-17). IGF-I, growth hormone (GH), patient-reported outcome, and safety data were collected. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients enrolled. In group 1 (n = 25), IGF-I and GH showed no significant change between SRL baseline and end of paltusotine treatment at week 13 (median change in IGF-I = -0.03×upper limit of normal [ULN]; P = .6285; GH = -0.05 ng/mL; P = .6285). IGF-I and GH rose significantly in the 4 weeks after withdrawing paltusotine (median change in IGF-I = 0.55×ULN; P < .0001 [median increase 39%]; GH = 0.72 ng/mL; P < .0001 [109.1% increase]). No patients discontinued because of adverse events (AE); no treatment-related serious AEs were reported. CONCLUSION: These results suggest once-daily oral paltusotine was effective in maintaining IGF-I values in patients with acromegaly who switched from injected SRLs. Paltusotine was well tolerated with a safety profile consistent with other SRLs.

Clinical application of the GLOBE and United Kingdom-primary biliary cholangitis risk scores in a trial cohort of patients with primary biliary cholangitis.

The GLOBAL Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) Study Group and United Kingdom-PBC (UK-PBC) Consortium have demonstrated that dichotomous response criteria are not as accurate as continuous equations at predicting mortality or liver transplantation in PBC. The aim of this analysis was to assess the clinical utility of the GLOBE and UK-PBC risk scores using data from POISE, a phase 3 trial investigating obeticholic acid (OCA) in patients with PBC. Data (N = 216) at baseline and month 12 were used to calculate the GLOBE and UK-PBC risk scores to assess the projected change in risk with OCA versus placebo. Additionally, the benefit of OCA was assessed in patients not meeting the POISE primary endpoint. Both the GLOBE and UK-PBC risk scores predicted a significant reduction in long-term risk of death and liver transplantation after OCA treatment (P < 0.0001). The differences in the relative risk reduction from baseline in the 10-year event risk after 1 year for OCA 10 mg versus placebo was 26% (GLOBE) and 37% (UK-PBC). The scores also predicted a significantly decreased risk in patients treated with OCA who did not meet POISE response criteria after 1 year of treatment compared to an increased risk with placebo (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: This analysis demonstrates the use of the GLOBE and UK-PBC risk scores to assess risk reduction of a cohort treated with OCA. While validation of this risk reduction in studies with clinical outcomes is needed, this study highlights the potential use of these scores in individualizing risk prediction in PBC both in clinical practice and therapeutic trials. (Hepatology Communications 2018;2:683-692).

Safety and Tolerability of Multiple Ascending Doses of PRX002/RG7935, an Anti-α-Synuclein Monoclonal Antibody, in Patients With Parkinson Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Aggregated α-synuclein is believed to be central to the pathogenesis of Parkinson disease (PD). PRX002/RG7935 (PRX002) is a humanized monoclonal antibody designed to target aggregated forms of α-synuclein, thereby inhibiting neuron-to-neuron transfer of presumed pathogenic forms of α-synuclein, potentially resulting in neuronal protection and slowing disease progression. Objective: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of multiple intravenous infusions of PRX002 in patients with idiopathic PD. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending-dose trial at 8 US study centers from July 2014 to September 2016. Eligible participants were aged 40 to 80 years with mild to moderate idiopathic PD (Hoehn and Yahr stages 1-3). Interventions: Participants were enrolled into 6 ascending-dose cohorts and randomly assigned to receive PRX002 (0.3 mg/kg, 1.0 mg/kg, 3.0 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, 30 mg/kg, or 60 mg/kg) or placebo. Participants received 3 intravenous infusions every 4 weeks of PRX002 or placebo and were monitored during a 24-week observational period. Main Outcomes and Measures: Safety and tolerability assessments included physical and neurological examinations, laboratory tests, vital signs, and adverse events. Pharmacokinetic parameters included maximum PRX002 concentration, area under the curve, and half-life. Results: Of the 80 participants, most were white (97.5%; n = 78) and male (80%; n = 64); median (SD) age was 58 (8.4) years. PRX002 was generally safe and well tolerated; no serious or severe PRX002-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported. The TEAEs experienced by at least 5% of patients receiving PRX002, irrespective of relatedness to study drug, were constipation (9.1%; n = 5), infusion reaction (7.3%; n = 4), diarrhea (5.5%; n = 3), headache (5.5%; n = 3), peripheral edema (5.5%; n = 3), post-lumbar puncture syndrome (5.5%; n = 3), and upper respiratory tract infection (5.5%; n = 3). No antidrug antibodies were detected. Serum PRX002 levels increased in an approximately dose-proportional manner; mean terminal elimination half-life was similar across all doses (10.2 days). Rapid dose- and time-dependent mean reductions from baseline vs placebo in free serum α-synuclein levels of up to 97% were seen after a single infusion at the highest dose (F78,284 = 1.66; P = .002), with similar reductions after 2 additional infusions. Mean cerebrospinal fluid PRX002 concentration increased with PRX002 dose and was approximately 0.3% relative to serum across all dose cohorts. Conclusions and Relevance: Single and multiple doses of PRX002 were generally safe and well tolerated and resulted in robust binding of peripheral α-synuclein and dose-dependent increases of PRX002 in cerebrospinal fluid, reaching cerebrospinal fluid concentrations that may be expected to engage extracellular aggregated α-synuclein in the brain. Findings support the design of an ongoing phase 2 clinical study (NCT03100149). Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02157714.

A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Obeticholic Acid in Primary Biliary Cholangitis.

BACKGROUND: Primary biliary cholangitis (formerly called primary biliary cirrhosis) can progress to cirrhosis and death despite ursodiol therapy. Alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin levels correlate with the risk of liver transplantation or death. Obeticholic acid, a farnesoid X receptor agonist, has shown potential benefit in patients with this disease. METHODS: In this 12-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 217 patients who had an inadequate response to ursodiol or who found the side effects of ursodiol unacceptable to receive obeticholic acid at a dose of 10 mg (the 10-mg group), obeticholic acid at a dose of 5 mg with adjustment to 10 mg if applicable (the 5-10-mg group), or placebo. The primary end point was an alkaline phosphatase level of less than 1.67 times the upper limit of the normal range, with a reduction of at least 15% from baseline, and a normal total bilirubin level. RESULTS: Of 216 patients who underwent randomization and received at least one dose of obeticholic acid or placebo, 93% received ursodiol as background therapy. The primary end point occurred in more patients in the 5-10-mg group (46%) and the 10-mg group (47%) than in the placebo group (10%; P<0.001 for both comparisons). Patients in the 5-10-mg group and those in the 10-mg group had greater decreases than those in the placebo group in the alkaline phosphatase level (least-squares mean, -113 and -130 U per liter, respectively, vs. -14 U per liter; P<0.001 for both comparisons) and total bilirubin level (-0.02 and -0.05 mg per deciliter [-0.3 and -0.9 µmol per liter], respectively, vs. 0.12 mg per deciliter [2.0 µmol per liter]; P<0.001 for both comparisons). Changes in noninvasive measures of liver fibrosis did not differ significantly between either treatment group and the placebo group at 12 months. Pruritus was more common with obeticholic acid than with placebo (56% of patients in the 5-10-mg group and 68% of those in the 10-mg group vs. 38% in the placebo group). The rate of serious adverse events was 16% in the 5-10-mg group, 11% in the 10-mg group, and 4% in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Obeticholic acid administered with ursodiol or as monotherapy for 12 months in patients with primary biliary cholangitis resulted in decreases from baseline in alkaline phosphatase and total bilirubin levels that differed significantly from the changes observed with placebo. There were more serious adverse events with obeticholic acid. (Funded by Intercept Pharmaceuticals; POISE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01473524; Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN89514817.).

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the abuse potential of different formulations of oral oxycodone.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and abuse potential of different formulations of oxycodone. DESIGN: The participants completed an 8-day, placebo-controlled trial with four phases: naloxone challenge, double-blind drug discrimination, double-blind abuse liability, and discontinuation. SUBJECTS: Nineteen healthy, male, recreational drug abusers participated in this study. INTERVENTIONS: The participants were administered different doses and formulations of oxycodone (40 mg immediate release [IR], 40 mg controlled release [CR], crushed 40 mg CR, and 80 mg CR) to evaluate pharmacokinetic parameters and ratings of drug liking and high. OUTCOME MEASURES: Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined over a 12-hour dosing interval. The primary pharmacodynamic endpoints were two questions from the Drug Effects Questionnaire ("Do you like the drug?" and "How high are you now?"). RESULTS: Maximal plasma concentrations and area under the curve determinations were similar for 40 mg IR, crushed 40 mg CR, and 80 mg CR, which were all greater than 40 mg CR. For drug liking and high, the maximal effect and area under the effect curve were similar for the three formulations, which were all greater than 40 mg CR. The dose required to produce comparable reports of drug liking and high was approximately twofold greater for the CR vs IR formulation. When the 40 mg CR tablet was crushed, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile was similar to the 40 mg IR formulation. Adverse events were consistent with opioid administration. CONCLUSIONS: Intact, orally administered oxycodone CR produced less drug liking and high than IR oxycodone, and required approximately twofold greater doses to produce subjective effects comparable to IR oxycodone.

Pharmacotherapy of pain in depressed older adults.

OBJECTIVES: To examine pharmacotherapy for pain in a sample of 1,801 depressed older primary care patients. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey data collected from 1999 to 2001. SETTING: Eighteen primary care clinics belonging to eight healthcare organizations in five states. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand eight hundred one patients aged 60 and older who met diagnostic criteria for major depression or dysthymia. MEASUREMENTS: Diagnoses or treatment for chronic pain, functional impairment from pain, and use of over-the-counter and prescription analgesic medications. RESULTS: One thousand four hundred sixteen (79%) participants reported functional impairment from pain in the previous month, and 1,024 (57%) reported a diagnosis of or treatment for chronic pain in the previous 3 years. Fifty-one percent of those with recent functional impairment from pain reported any analgesic use, ranging from 31% to 75% across the participating healthcare organizations. Opioid analgesic use varied from 5% to 34%. Predictors of analgesic use included a history of chronic pain or arthritis and the degree of functional impairment from pain in the previous month. Differences in analgesic use across participating organizations remained significant after adjusting for clinical and demographic covariates. CONCLUSION: Most depressed older adults in the sample reported recent functional impairment from pain and a history of chronic pain, but almost half of those with functional impairment from pain did not report using analgesic medications. Participating organizations varied substantially in their use of analgesics, suggesting that there is room to improve the quality of pain management in depressed older adults.

Cognitive impairment, chronic medical illness, and risk of mortality in an elderly cohort.

OBJECTIVE: The mortality risk for older persons with chronic medical illness and cognitive impairment is relatively unknown. The authors assessed 6-year mortality risks for cognitive impairment and six chronic diseases in 7,482 subjects from the East Boston, Massachusetts, and rural Iowa cohorts of the Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies in the Elderly (EPESE). METHODS: Cognitive impairment was identified with a modified form of Pfeiffer's Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire. Chronic medical illnesses included diabetes, stroke, myocardial infarction, hypertension, hip fracture, and cancer. The authors examined the association of cognitive impairment and each of the six chronic illnesses with mortality by means of Cox proportional-hazards regression models, and determined the interaction of cognitive impairment and chronic medical illness on mortality. RESULTS: Participants who were cognitively impaired at baseline were found to have a 68% increased relative risk of mortality. The relative risks of mortality from diabetes, heart attack, stroke, and hip fracture were similar to the risk from cognitive impairment. Interactions between cognitive impairment and each chronic medical illness on mortality were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Survival curves demonstrate that the effects of cognitive impairment and chronic medical illness on mortality are mostly additive, resulting in very poor survival for those with both medical illness and cognitive impairment. Further research should examine the healthcare behaviors and needs of older adults with cognitive impairment.

Depressive symptoms and mortality in a prospective study of 2,558 older adults.

OBJECTIVE: The authors report results from a 7-year prospective study of depression and mortality in 2,558 Medicare recipients age 65 and older. METHODS: This report is based on a secondary data analysis of a randomized controlled trial that evaluated the cost-effectiveness of preventive services for older enrollees in an HMO. RESULTS: Subjects with mild-to-moderate depression at baseline did not have an increased risk of mortality compared with those without significant depression. The 3% of older adults with the most severe depressive syndromes, however, had significant increases in mortality, even after adjusting for demographics, health risk behaviors, and chronic medical disorders. CONCLUSION: The increase in mortality in this group of older adults was comparable to that in participants with chronic medical disorders such as emphysema or heart disease.