ABSTRACT
NDP kinases are the non-specific enzymes which catalyse the synthesis of the NTPs through a transfer reaction using ATP as phosphoryl donor. In addition to their enzymatic activity, they display other not yet explained functions related to cell growth, differentiation and apoptosis, embryonic development, tumour progression and metastasis. In this study, the expression patterns of the three highly related NDP kinases A, B and C isoforms were investigated in the developing human trophoblast. Both NDP kinase A and B were found to be primarily present in the villous and extravillous cytotrophoblasts, while NDP kinase C was found almost exclusively in the syncytiotrophoblast layer. This suggests that NDP kinase A and B could be a marker for the mononuclear stage of differentiation of villous trophoblasts, while NDP kinase C could be a marker of the syncytiotrophoblast layer.
Subject(s)
Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental/genetics , Nucleoside-Diphosphate Kinase/genetics , Trophoblasts/enzymology , Embryonic and Fetal Development/physiology , Eye Proteins/metabolism , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , In Situ Hybridization , Ki-67 Antigen/analysis , NM23 Nucleoside Diphosphate Kinases , Nerve Tissue Proteins/metabolism , Nucleoside-Diphosphate Kinase/metabolism , PregnancyABSTRACT
The aim of the present study was to compare conventional and computer-assisted morphology assessment of spermatozoa. Sixty-two semen samples from patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) and 40 samples from patients undergoing an intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) were studied using both techniques. The percentage of normal spermatozoa found was closely correlated between the techniques (r=0.788, p < 0.0001). The intra-operator variation was low for both techniques but the inter-operator variation was much higher with the conventional than with the computer-assisted method (coefficient of variation = 0.43 vs. 0.08, respectively, for conventional and computer-assisted assessments). The percentage of spermatozoa with normal morphology, as well as sperm motility, was significantly enhanced after PureSperm preparation, whatever the method used for assessment. In the IVF study, fertilization rate was poorly correlated with sperm morphology using both methods. However, combined with motility, morphology assessed with the computer allowed discrimination of two groups of patients with significantly different fertilization rates (30.5 +/- 5.4% vs. 63.1 +/- 5.4%, p < 0.0001). In contrast, the fertilization rate in ICSI was influenced neither by sperm morphology nor by motility. In conclusion, computer-assisted assessment of sperm morphology has a slightly better predictive value for ART than conventional assessment, but above all is much more reproducible, allowing standardization.
