Secondary cytoreductive surgery, hyperthermic intraperitoneal intraoperative chemotherapy, and chemotherapy alone: a retrospective comparison of alternative approaches in relapsed platinum sensitive ovarian cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The best treatment for relapsed platinum sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is controversial. The aim of the study was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in platinum-sensitive EOC patients treated with chemotherapy alone (CTA), secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCR) or SCR plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal intraoperative chemotherapy (HIPEC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the clinical outcome of 46 EOC patients with at least 30 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 32 months for the CTA group, 30 months for the SCR group, and 45 months for the SCR + HIPEC group. Fifteen recurrences were observed in the CTA group, seven in the SCR group, and 16 in the SCR + HIPEC group. The median time elapsed between first and second recurrence (PFI-2) was significantly higher among patients treated with SCR + HIPEC, in comparison with patients treated with CTA (p = 0.012 andp = 0.017, respectively). On the contrary, PFI-2 did not significantly differ between the SCR and SCR + HIPEC groups (p = 0.877). A statistically significant difference in OS favouring SCR + HIPEC in comparison with CTA (p = 0.04) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: SCR HIPEC compared with CTA improves PFI-2 in patients with platinum-sensitive EOC recurrence. SCR + HIPEC might also improve OS in comparison with CTA. No improvement in favor of SCR + HIPEC vs SCR was observed,. These results further support the need of a randomized trial comparing chemotherapy with SCR ± HIPEC in this setting.

Ovarian metastases in early-stage cervical cancer (IA2-IIA): a multicenter retrospective study of 1965 patients (a Cooperative Task Force study).

This is a retrospective study of patients treated for early-stage cervical cancer to identify pathologic risk factors associated with ovarian metastases and, therefore, to establish when ovarian preservation can be performed without increasing the risk of relapse in order to improve the quality of life in premenopausal patients. Between 1982 and 2004, 1965 patients with FIGO stage IA2-IB-IIA cervical squamous cell carcinoma and nonsquamous histology types were surgically treated; 1695 (86%) patients underwent primary radical hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and pelvic node dissection, the remaining 270 patients (14%) had their ovaries preserved. The clinical records were reviewed for all patients and clinical features at presentation, the histopathology and follow-up data were recorded. Overall, ovarian metastases were diagnosed in 16 of 1695 patients, for an incidence rate of 0.9%. Univariate analysis shows age (45 years: P = 0.0079), FIGO stage (IB1-IIA 4 cm: P = 0.0133), histology (squamous vs nonsquamous, P = 0.0014), noninvolved peripheral stromal thickness (<3 vs >3 mm: P = 0.0001), lymphvascular space involvement (present vs absent, P = 0.0007), lymph node status (positive vs negative, P = 0.00009) to be statistically associated with the presence of ovarian metastases. Multivariate analysis shows only age (P = 0.0119), FIGO stage (P = 0.011), histology (P = 0.001), and unaffected peripheral stromal thickness (<3 mm: P = 0.037) to be independent risk factors for ovarian metastases. Based on the present data and on the data available in the literature, ovarian preservation could be safely performed in young patients with early-stage squamous cell carcinoma (histology as the most significant risk factor), with macroscopically normal ovaries, and with preserved peripheral unaffected cervical stroma.