Gentrification and preterm birth in New York City, 2008­2010.

Adverse birth outcomes have been linked to neighborhood level socioeconomic status. However, little work has examined the influence of social and economic change over time (i.e., gentrification) on health. This study aims to assess the association between gentrification and preterm birth (PTB) while examining the modifying effect of maternal race/ethnicity and educational attainment. New York City births, 2008­2010, (n=126,165) were linked to a measure of gentrification at the community district level (n=59). The gentrification measure was calculated using percent change in education level, poverty level, and median household income (MHI) between the 2005­2009 American Community Survey and the 1990 Census. PTB was defined as clinical gestational age less than 37 weeks. Generalized estimating equations were utilized to examine the association. Gentrification (i.e., increase in residents with a college education, increase in MHI, and decrease in residents living below the poverty line) was not associated with PTB. However, among Non-Hispanic Blacks, very high gentrification was adversely associated with PTB (AOR, 1.16; 95 % CI, 1.01­1.33) as compared to those who lived in a very low gentrified neighborhood. Among non- Hispanic Whites, living in a very high gentrified neighborhood was protective as compared to living in a very low gentrified neighborhood (AOR, 0.78; 95 % CI, 0.64­ 0.94). Although there is a need to develop a more nuanced measure of gentrification, these results indicate that changes in the economic character of a neighborhood may have a significant influence on birth outcomes.

Assessing mobile food vendors (a.k.a. street food vendors)--methods, challenges, and lessons learned for future food-environment research.

OBJECTIVES: Mobile food vendors (also known as street food vendors) may be important sources of food, particularly in minority and low-income communities. Unfortunately, there are no good data sources on where, when, or what vendors sell. The lack of a published assessment method may contribute to the relative exclusion of mobile food vendors from existing food-environment research. A goal of this study was to develop, pilot, and refine a method to assess mobile food vendors. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional assessment of mobile food vendors through direct observations and brief interviews. METHODS: Using printed maps, investigators canvassed all streets in Bronx County, NY (excluding highways but including entrance and exit ramps) in 2010, looking for mobile food vendors. For each vendor identified, researchers recorded a unique identifier, the vendor's location, and direct observations. Investigators also recorded vendors answers to where, when, and what they sold. RESULTS: Of 372 identified vendors, 38% did not answer brief-interview questions (19% were 'in transit', 15% refused; others were absent from their carts/trucks/stands or with customers). About 7% of vendors who ultimately answered questions were reluctant to engage with researchers. Some vendors expressed concerns about regulatory authority; only 34% of vendors had visible permits or licenses and many vendors had improvised illegitimate-appearing set-ups. The majority of vendors (75% of those responding) felt most comfortable speaking Spanish; 5% preferred other non-English languages. Nearly a third of vendors changed selling locations (streets, neighbourhoods, boroughs) day-to-day or even within a given day. There was considerable variability in times (hours, days, months) in which vendors reported doing business; for 86% of vendors, weather was a deciding factor. CONCLUSIONS: Mobile food vendors have a variable and fluid presence in an urban environment. Variability in hours and locations, having most comfort with languages other than English, and reluctance to interact with individuals gathering data are principal challenges to assessment. Strategies to address assessment challenges that emerged form this project may help make mobile-vendor assessments more routine in food-environment research.

Selective dopamine-1 receptor agonist augments regional myocardial blood flow: comparison of fenoldopam and dopamine.

A new class of vasodilators exhibiting selective dopamine-1 receptor agonist activity is being introduced into clinical practice. Inasmuch as various vasodilators either augment or decrease myocardial blood flow ("coronary steal") depending on their pharmacologic action, the goal of this study was to assess the effects of fenoldopam (selective dopamine-1 receptor agonist) and dopamine (nonselective dopamine-1 receptor agonist) on regional myocardial blood flow in the presence of coronary occlusion. Accordingly, in 16 dogs anesthetized with pentobarbital, the left anterior descending coronary artery was occluded. Cardiovascular and renal hemodynamic effects were measured before and after intravenous infusion of renal equipotent doses of either fenoldopam (n = 9, 0.1 micrograms/kg/min) or dopamine (n = 7, 1 micrograms/kg/min). Both fenoldopam and dopamine caused a significant and comparable increase in renal blood flow. Fenoldopam but not dopamine significantly decreased the calculated peripheral vascular resistance and subsequently increased cardiac output. Dopamine had no effect on regional myocardial blood flow. In contrast, fenoldopam augmented transmural myocardial blood flow in normal (from 114 +/- 10 to 188 +/- 27 ml/100 gm/min, p less than 0.02) and ischemic border myocardium (from 45 +/- 5 to 68 +/- 11 ml/100 gm/min, p less than 0.03 and p less than 0.02 vs dopamine). There was a significant increase in blood flow to both the endocardial and epicardial layers of normal and ischemic border myocardium. These changes were accompanied by a significant reduction in coronary vascular resistance in the normal myocardium.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)