ABSTRACT
This study aims to analyze the influence of the application of cryotherapy on shoulder proprioception in badminton athletes. Thirty federated badminton athletes were included in this study, all of whom belonged to three of the teams currently competing in national competitions (Portugal). Their mean ages were 21.00 ± 5.60 years, and their experience in the modality was 8.40 ± 6.93 years. They practiced in an average of 2.93 ± 1.26 training sessions per week. All of them used their right hand to hold the racket. Each participant's dominant shoulder joint position and force senses were evaluated for four consecutive time points through the isokinetic dynamometer Biodex System 3. The experimental procedure consisted of applying ice for 15 min and the control procedure consisted of no therapeutic intervention. The proprioception outcomes were expressed using the absolute error, relative error, and variable error. All statistical analysis was performed using PASW Statistics 18 software (IBM-SPSS Statistics). There were no statistically significant changes in the joint position and force senses after the intervention, as well as during the subsequent 30 min. We conclude that, after this cryotherapy technique, there is no increased risk of injury associated with a proprioception deficit that prevents athletes from immediately returning to badminton practice.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Few methodologies are used to assess Tibialis Posterior muscle stiffness. Those present limitations leading to a lack of evidence. Muscle stiffness assessment can help in the injuries risk factors identification while coupling with Ultrasound based Shear-Wave Elastography for its management. However, a precise and reliable methodology needs to be utilized to increase stiffness accuracy among the entire Tibialis Posterior muscle. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the stiffness association between Tibialis posterior deep and superficial layer and between flat and neutral footed subjects. METHODS: The sample consisted of 18 participants, where 9 subjects represent the flatfoot group and 9 the neutral foot group. Only the subjects who presented a Navicular Drop Test value of > 9 mm were included in the flatfooted group. All participants were submitted to the Tibialis posterior stiffness assessment with the help of Ultrasound base Shear-Wave Elastography in a lying supine position. Association between Tibialis Posterior deep and superficial layers were determined by Pearson's correlation analysis and group differences were assessed using the U-Mann Whitney test in the comparison between flat foot and neutral foot group (p < 0.05). RESULTS: No significant correlations between Tibialis Posterior layers stiffness were found (p = 0.194), nor in the comparison between both neutral and flat foot groups (p = 0.424/p = 0.258). CONCLUSION: Among participants, no associations between tibialis posterior layers stiffness were found. Also, we did not find any differences in the stiffness between flat and neutral foot groups. In this study, the stiffness did not differentiate flat-footed subjects from neutral subjects.
