Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Prosthodont ; 36(5): 649, 2023 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37921676

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare the CIE L*a*b* values of two different dental shade guides using two shade-matching spectrophotometers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: SpectroShade Micro (SS) and Easyshade (ES) (VITA Zahnfabrik) were tested. One calibrated operator performed 30 measurements of each tab from three batches of the two guides, VITA Classical (VC) and VITA 3D Shade Master (VM). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and intraclass coefficients (ICC) between the different batches were calculated. Results were given as mean and SD of the L*a*b* values and the respective color differences according to the CIEDE 2000 formula (ΔE00) for each of the shade tabs in the two spectrophotometers and then analyzed with independent student t test (α = .05). RESULTS: A total of 1,440 and 2,610 measurements for VC and VM, respectively, were performed per spectrophotometer. There were statistically significant differences between the two devices for all L*a*b* values, with the exception of: L* for 3R1.5; a* for 2R1.5, 3L1.5, 2L2.5, 3M2, 3L2.5, 4L1.5, and 4L2.5; and b* for D3, 1M2, and 3M2. When assessing the same shade guide, differences in ΔE00 were detected between devices above the acceptability threshold (AT) (ΔE00 ≥ 1.8) for all shade tabs except for VC (C1, C2, D3, A3.5, C3, and A4) and VM (4M1, 3R2.5, 4L2.5, and 4M3). The overall mean of the interdevice ΔE00 was 2.2 ± 1.0 for VC and 2.5 ± 1.0 for VM. CONCLUSIONS: The two dental spectrophotometers presented high ICC and ROC values, which validates their indication as auxiliary tools. However, there are discrepancies in the hues D (VC) and R (VM) with interdevice variability when evaluated for the L*a*b* component. Int J Prosthodont 2023;36:e38-e52.


Subject(s)
Dental Prosthesis Design , Prosthesis Coloring , Color , Spectrophotometry , Colorimetry
2.
J Clin Med ; 11(3)2022 Feb 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35160343

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bone regeneration procedures represent a major challenge in oral surgery. This study aimed to evaluate a composite PRF/particulate xenograft in guided bone regeneration. METHODS: Edentulous patients with horizontal ridge deficiencies in the anterior maxilla and candidates to an immediate-loading full-arch rehabilitation were included. Horizontal linear measurements indicating bone gain were assessed from computer beam computer tomography (CBCT) scans obtained at pre-surgery, post-surgery, and the 12-month follow-up. Mean bone values were presented as mean ± 95% CI. Non-parametric tests were used as appropriate, and the effect size was calculated with Cohen's d repeated measures. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were rehabilitated with 72 implants. The mean horizontal bone width was 4.47 [4.13-4.80] mm pre-surgically, 9.25 [8.76-9.75] mm post-surgically, and 7.71 [7.28-8.14] mm 12 months after. CONCLUSIONS: PRF associated with a xenograft seems to promote an effective horizontal bone gain. Randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm the benefits of this surgical approach.

3.
J Clin Med ; 10(21)2021 Nov 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34768687

ABSTRACT

This retrospective study analyzed implant survival of immediate implant-supported fixed complete denture (IFCD) treatment options (TOs) based on the level of alveolar atrophy (CC). Records of 882 patients receiving a total of 6042 implants at one private referral clinic between 2004 and 2020 were considered. The mean follow-up period was 3.8 ± 2.7 years. Cumulative implant survival rates (CSRs) were analyzed as a function of CCs and TOs according to Mantel-Haenszel and Mantel-Cox. Hazard risk ratios for implant loss were compared using Cox regression. Confounding factors were identified using mixed Cox regression models. The 2- and 5-year CSRs were 98.2% and 97.9%, respectively. Maxillary 2- and 5-year CSRs were lower (97.7% and 97.3%) compared to mandibular CSRs (99.8% and 98.6%) (p = 0.030 and 0.0020, respectively). The CC did not influence CSRs of IFCDs in the mandible (p = 0.1483 and 0.3014, respectively) but only in the maxilla (p = 0.0147 and 0.0111), where CSRs decreased with increasing atrophy. TOs did not statistically differ in terms of survival rate for a given level of alveolar atrophy. The adaption of IFCD treatments to the level of atrophy and patient-specific risk factors can result in high CSRs, even at different levels of bone atrophy.

4.
AIDS Care ; 33(10): 1321-1328, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32715739

ABSTRACT

This cross-sectional study compared the Oral-Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) in HIV negative patients (Group 1, n=129, mean age: 39.9 ± 15.6, 75 females) and HIV+ patients (Group 2, n=670, mean age: 43.2 ± 9.8, 246 females) from the same socio-economic environment using the OHIP-49 questionnaire. OHIP total score were determined by simple summing. A multiple linear regression model was carried out to predict OHIP scores in which HIV+ patients experienced a significantly (p<0.001) worst OHRQoL for total and every dimension. A general linear model was used for estimating the means in the two groups adjusted for covariates included in the previous model. Adjusted means for subscale and total OHIP scores were significantly higher for Group 2 (61.6 ± 6.26 vs. 119.8 ± 3.31) with a large effect size (0.94). HIV+ infection, decayed teeth, prosthodontic and surgical needs, care index, drug use, employment and age presented an independent effect on questionnaire scores. This study shows that HIV+ infection has an independent and negative impact on the OHRQoL while care index presents a positive impact. Additional factors like high decayed teeth, prosthodontic treatment needs and drug use are independently associated with total OHIP scores, presenting a negative effect on OHRQoL.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , HIV-1 , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Oral Health , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
5.
Oral Dis ; 26(2): 313-324, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31814226

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of gustatory stimulants of salivary secretion (GSSS) on Sjögren's syndrome patients' self-perception of xerostomia, oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and salivary secretion. METHODS: A total of 110 Sjögren's syndrome patients were randomly allocated to be treated with either a malic acid lozenge or a citric acid mouthwash and then crossed over. Before and after the interventions, the Xerostomia Inventory 5 (SXI-5-PL) and the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14-PT) questionnaires (both in the Portuguese language) were administered to patients. Unstimulated, mechanical and gustatory-stimulated salivary flows were determined. Repeated measures and between-subject analyses were performed. Statistical significance was set at 5%. RESULTS: After the intervention and within each group, both GSSS elicited a reduction in the SXI-5-PL and OHIP-14-PT scores and an increase in salivary output, significant in the malic acid lozenge group. The malic acid treatment resulted in a greater effect size and percentage improvement than citric acid mouthwash. The malic acid lozenge also produced a significant greater salivary output than the citric acid rising solution. CONCLUSIONS: In Sjögren's syndrome patients, lozenges containing malic acid increased saliva production and xerostomia relief, resulting in improved quality of life.


Subject(s)
Citric Acid/therapeutic use , Malates/therapeutic use , Mouthwashes/therapeutic use , Saliva/physiology , Salivation/drug effects , Sjogren's Syndrome/drug therapy , Citric Acid/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Malates/pharmacology , Male , Middle Aged , Mouthwashes/pharmacology , Quality of Life , Sjogren's Syndrome/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome
6.
Gerodontology ; 35(1): 33-37, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29193291

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to validate and determine the reliability of the Portuguese version of the Summated Xerostomia Inventory. BACKGROUND: Many conditions such as head and neck radiation, autoimmune diseases or polypharmacy are characterised by hyposalivation which can affect oral and systemic quality of life. As such, this condition must be assessed, and the English version of the Xerostomia Inventory has been increasingly used to determine the severity of dry mouth perception. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study, which employed volunteers suffering from hyposalivation after local ethical committee clearance. Each patient signed an informed consent and responded to the Portuguese version of the questionnaire in the form of an interview. This was repeated again after 2 weeks. A standard single question provided a validity check. Data were analysed using Cronbach's α to test its reliability and total and interitem correlation, and intraclass correlation to determine its internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Significance was set at .05. RESULTS: A sample of 103 volunteers was recruited. Cronbach's α was .84 and .87 for the first and second test administrations, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient value for the test-retest reliability was .93, and scores for the individual items ranged from .79 to .90. The correlation between the total score of the questionnaire and standard single dry mouth question was .66, indicating a very good correlation. CONCLUSION: Demonstrating excellent psychometric properties, the Summated Xerostomia Inventory (Portuguese Version) is a valid tool for quantifying Xerostomia in a dry mouth-afflicted population.


Subject(s)
Xerostomia/diagnosis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Portugal , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
Clin Oral Investig ; 16(1): 155-63, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21221681

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study is to compare salivary hydrogen peroxide (HP) release kinetics and potential toxicity of systemic exposure of four different whitening products. A double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted in a Portuguese dental faculty clinic. Two hundred forty volunteers were randomized to eight intervention groups. Participants were randomly assigned to receive active or placebo applications of one of four different products: Opalescence 10% PF™ (OPL), Vivastyle® 10%™ (VS10%), Vivadent Paint On Plus™ (PO+), and Trés White Supreme™ (TWS). Saliva collection was obtained by established methods at different times. The HP salivary content was determined by a photometric method. Salivary HP variations, total amount of salivary HP, and counts of subjects above the safe daily HP dose were the main outcome measures. All whitening systems significantly released HP to the saliva when compared to placebo, and all showed different release kinetics. The adaptable tray system (TWS) presented a risk increase of 37% [20-54%, 95% confidence interval] when compared to the other systems. The use of an adaptable tray whitening system with higher concentration of HP increases the toxicity potential.


Subject(s)
Hydrogen Peroxide/pharmacokinetics , Saliva/metabolism , Tooth Bleaching Agents/pharmacokinetics , Carbamide Peroxide , Double-Blind Method , Drug Combinations , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Peroxides/pharmacokinetics , Photometry , Placebos , Polyvinyls/pharmacokinetics , Safety , Time Factors , Tooth Bleaching/instrumentation , Tooth Bleaching/methods , Urea/analogs & derivatives , Urea/pharmacokinetics , Young Adult
8.
Eur J Esthet Dent ; 1(1): 70-7, 2006 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19655477

ABSTRACT

In-office techniques for bleaching vital teeth are effective and expedient, but because they require the use of elevated concentrations of hydrogen peroxide-based agents, which are caustic and potentially toxic, they are found to be less appealing by practitioners compared with home whitening procedures. In this article we propose a new technique for in-office whitening of vital teeth using a 6% hydrogen peroxide paint-on whitening varnish, which enables the whitening procedure to be more economic and user-friendly, as well as less toxic and time consuming, compared with traditional in-office bleaching. A total of six patients with no caries or restorations in the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth were selected for this study. Ten-minute applications of the paint-on whitening varnish were performed repeatedly with each patient for up to 1 hour and then repeated 1 week later. Initial shades were recorded with a Vita scale guide, and photographs were taken at the beginning and end of the study. A questionnaire assessing clinical parameters and patient satisfaction was performed. A change of 7 to 13 values on the Vita scale was observed in all cases. There were no reports of tooth sensitivity, and overall patient satisfaction was achieved. In-office bleaching with the use of paint-on varnishes seems to be effective, safe, and well accepted by patients, offering a viable alternative to high-peroxide-concentration in-office procedures.


Subject(s)
Hydrogen Peroxide/therapeutic use , Oxidants/therapeutic use , Tooth Bleaching/methods , Color , Colorimetry , Dental Offices , Follow-Up Studies , Gingiva/drug effects , Humans , Hydrogen Peroxide/administration & dosage , Oxidants/administration & dosage , Paint , Photography , Time Factors , Tooth/drug effects , Tooth/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...