Different phenotypes in dermatomyositis associated with anti-MDA5 antibody: Study of 121 cases.

OBJECTIVES: The predominance of extramuscular manifestations (e.g., skin rash, arthralgia, interstitial lung disease [ILD]) as well as the low frequency of muscle signs in anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibody-positive (anti-MDA5+) dermatomyositis caused us to question the term myositis-specific antibody for the anti-MDA5 antibody, as well as the homogeneity of the disease. METHODS: To characterize the anti-MDA5+ phenotype, an unsupervised analysis was performed on anti-MDA5+ patients (n = 83/121) and compared to a group of patients with myositis without anti-MDA5 antibody (anti-MDA5-; n = 190/201) based on selected variables, collected retrospectively, without any missing data. RESULTS: Within anti-MDA5+ patients (n = 83), 3 subgroups were identified. One group (18.1%) corresponded to patients with a rapidly progressive ILD (93.3%; p < 0.0001 across all) and a very high mortality rate. The second subgroup (55.4%) corresponded to patients with pure dermato-rheumatologic symptoms (arthralgia; 82.6%; p < 0.01) and a good prognosis. The third corresponded to patients, mainly male (72.7%; p < 0.0001), with severe skin vasculopathy, frequent signs of myositis (proximal weakness: 68.2%; p < 0.0001), and an intermediate prognosis. Raynaud phenomenon, arthralgia/arthritis, and sex permit the cluster appurtenance (83.3% correct estimation). Nevertheless, an unsupervised analysis confirmed that anti-MDA5 antibody delineates an independent group of patients (e.g., dermatomyositis skin rash, skin ulcers, calcinosis, mechanic's hands, ILD, arthralgia/arthritis, and high mortality rate) distinct from anti-MDA5- patients with myositis. CONCLUSION: Anti-MDA5+ patients have a systemic syndrome distinct from other patients with myositis. Three subgroups with different prognosis exist.

Outcome of patients with sarcoidosis refractory to TNF antagonists: a case series.

Background: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists have been reported as an efficient third-line therapy for sarcoidosis but there is no data regarding patients who do not respond to this treatment. Objective: To report the characteristics, the outcome and the response to therapy of patients with sarcoidosis resistant to TNF antagonists. Methods: Patients from the French STAT (Sarcoidosis Treatment with Anti-TNF) registry who were classified as non-responders and who were followed-up for >1 year were included. The response to further therapies was classified as complete response, or partial response, and the others were classified as non-responders. Results: Among the 132 patients from the registry, 14 were considered as non-responders to anti-TNF. Nine patients (66% of women; mean age 48 years) were analyzed. The mean number of organs involved was 4.2. Seven patients were previously treated with more than 2 immunosuppressive treatments. The mean duration of the anti-TNF treatment was 9 months (range, 3-24). After a mean follow-up duration of 58 months (median, 35; range, 19-128) a complete response was observed in 2/9 cases, a partial response in 5/9 cases, and 2/9 cases were considered as non-responders. In all but one patient, the immunosuppressant that allowed the clinical response had previously been used. Furthermore, the dosage was not necessarily increased to gain efficacy. Non-responders were treated by corticosteroids only because of their comorbidities or noncompliance. Conclusion: In patients who do not respond to TNF antagonists, previously used immunosuppressants may be useful. Excluding a differential diagnosis, assessing compliance and testing for anti-drug antibodies should be systematic. (Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis 2018; 35: 371-375).

Efficacy and Tolerance of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor α Agents in Cutaneous Sarcoidosis: A French Study of 46 Cases.

Importance: Evidence for the long-term efficacy and safety of anti-tumor necrosis factor α agents (anti-TNF) in treating cutaneous sarcoidosis is lacking. Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of anti-TNF in treating cutaneous sarcoidosis in a large observational study. Design, Setting, and Participants: STAT (Sarcoidosis Treated with Anti-TNF) is a French retrospective and prospective multicenter observational database that receives data from teaching hospitals and referral centers, as well as several pneumology, dermatology, and internal medicine departments. Included patients had histologically proven sarcoidosis and received anti-TNF between January 2004 and January 2016. We extracted data for patients with skin involvement at anti-TNF initiation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Response to treatment was evaluated for skin and visceral involvement using the ePOST (extra-pulmonary Physician Organ Severity Tool) severity score (from 0 [not affected] to 6 [very severe involvement]). Epidemiological and cutaneous features at baseline, efficacy, steroid-sparing, safety, and relapses were recorded. The overall cutaneous response rate (OCRR) was defined as complete (final cutaneous ePOST score of 0 or 1) or partial response (ePOST drop ≥2 points from baseline but >1 at last follow-up). Results: Among 140 patients in the STAT database, 46 had skin involvement. The most frequent lesions were lupus pernio (n = 21 [46%]) and nodules (n = 20 [43%]). The median cutaneous severity score was 5 and/or 6 at baseline. Twenty-one patients were treated for skin involvement and 25 patients for visceral involvement. Reasons for initiating anti-TNF were failure or adverse effects of previous therapy in 42 patients (93%). Most patients received infliximab (n = 40 [87%]), with systemic steroids in 28 cases (61%) and immunosuppressants in 32 cases (69.5%). The median (range) follow-up was 45 (3-103) months. Of the 46 patients with sarcoidosis and skin involvement who were treated with anti-TNF were included, median (range) age was 50 (14-78) years, and 33 patients (72%) were women. The OCRR was 24% after 3 months, 46% after 6 months, and 79% after 12 months. Steroid sparing was significant. Treatment was discontinued because of adverse events in 11 patients (24%), and 21 infectious events occurred in 14 patients (30%). Infections were more frequent in patients treated for visceral involvement than in those treated for skin involvement (n = 12 of 25 [48%] vs n = 2 of 21 [9.5%], respectively; P = .02). The relapse rate was 44% 18 months after discontinuation of treatment. Relapses during treatment occurred in 35% of cases, mostly during anti-TNF or concomitant treatment tapering. Conclusions and Relevance: Anti-TNF agents are effective but suspensive in cutaneous sarcoidosis. The risk of infectious events must be considered.

Efficacy and safety of tumor necrosis factor antagonists in refractory sarcoidosis: A multicenter study of 132 patients.

INTRODUCTION: The off-label use of TNF antagonists in refractory sarcoidosis is increasingly reported but data on their efficacy and safety are still insufficient. OBJECTIVE: To report on efficacy and safety of TNF antagonists in severe and refractory sarcoidosis. METHODS: Examination of retrospective demographic, clinical, therapeutic, and adverse event data on 132 sarcoidosis patients (58% women; mean (min-max) age = 45.5 (14-78) years) given TNF antagonists (mainly infliximab, 91%) and investigation of response-linked factors. RESULTS: The overall clinical response (complete and partial) rate was 64%. TNF-antagonist efficacy (i.e., significant decrease of the ePOST score) was noted in cases with neurologic, heart, skin, and upper respiratory tract involvements. No significant difference in efficacy was found between anti-TNF used alone and TNF with immunosuppressant. The use of anti-TNF allowed reducing prednisone dosage at end of follow-up (p < 0.001). Adverse events were observed in 52% of the patients; they included infections (36%) and allergic reactions (8%) and required treatment interruption in 31 cases (23%). When TNF antagonists were interrupted, 13 patients experienced relapses within 14 months on average (median follow-up: 20.5 months). CONCLUSION: TNF antagonists were efficacious in about two-thirds of patients with severe/refractory sarcoidosis but their use led to a high rate of adverse events.

Efficacy and safety of TNF antagonists in ocular sarcoidosis: data from the French registry STAT.

Backgroung: This study investigated the efficacy and safety of TNF antagonists in sarcoid uveitis in unselected cases. Design: This is a multicentre study on patients with sarcoidosis who received TNF antagonists in pneumology and internal medicine departments in France. We present here the subgroup of patients with biopsy-proven sarcoid uveitis included in the nationwide registry STAT (Sarcoidosis treated with TNF AnTagonists). Results: Among the 132 patients included in this multicenter study, 18 patients with refractory uveitis were treated as a first-line TNF antagonist with infliximab (n=14), adalimumab (n=3) and certolizumab (n=1). Before anti-TNF initiation, the median duration of sarcoidosis was 42 months and 83% of the patients have been treated with at least one immunosuppressive drug. Six patients switched for a second-line TNF antagonist. After a mean time under treatment of 29 months, the treatment resulted in a significant decrease of the ophthalmic extrapulmonary Physician Organ Severity Tool (ePOST) (mean score: 4.2 vs. 2.6) scores and a steroid sparing effect (29.4±20.7 vs. 6.2±5.2 mg/d). Overall, the ophthalmic response, either complete or partial, was 67%. Nine patients (50%) presented adverse events, including severe infectious complications in 5 patients, which required anti-TNF treatment interruption in 6 cases (33%). Among the 7 responder patients who discontinued anti-TNF therapy, 71% relapsed. Finally, 12 patients (67%) could continue TNF antagonist treatment. Conclusions: TNF antagonists were efficient in 67% of biopsy-proven refractory sarcoid uveitis. Severe adverse events, mainly infectious complications, were frequent. The high frequency of relapses after anti-TNF-α discontinuation requires a close patient follow-up thereafter. (Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis 2017; 34: 74-80).

Efficacy and safety of infliximab therapy in refractory upper respiratory tract sarcoidosis: experience from the STAT registry.

Background: Upper respiratory tract (URT) involvement in sarcoidosis may be refractory to corticosteroids and immunosuppressants. Whether TNF-antagonists are efficient and safe in such phenotype is unknown. Methods: STAT is a French national drug registry including patients presenting sarcoidosis treated with TNF alpha antagonists. All cases of biopsy-proven sinonasal and laryngeal sarcoidosis were extracted and retrospectively analyzed from July 2014 to July 2015. Results: Twelve patients presenting biopsy-proven sarcoidosis with URT involvement were included in the STAT registry. Infliximab appeared effective in decreasing URT symptoms, as assessed by a significant decrease of the e-POST (extra-pulmonary Physician Organ Severity Tool) (1.5 [0-2] vs 5 [1.5-5], p=0.03) and a corticosteroids-sparing effect (7.5mg per day [5-10] vs 17.5 mg per day [7.5-20], p=0.04) at the end of follow-up. Conclusions: TNF-antagonists may be an efficient treatment of refractory URT manifestations and should be discussed when prolonged or high dosages of corticosteroids despite immunosuppressive therapy are required. (Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis 2017; 34: 343-351).