Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 57(11): 1282-9, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25285695

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection after stoma reversal is common. The optimal skin closure technique after stoma reversal has been widely debated in the literature. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that pursestring near-complete closure of the stoma site would lead to fewer surgical site infections compared with conventional primary closure. DESIGN: This study was a parallel prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at 2 university medical centers. PATIENTS: Patients (N = 122) presenting for elective colostomy or ileostomy reversal were selected. INTERVENTIONS: Pursestring versus conventional primary closure of stoma sites were compared. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Stoma site surgical site infection within 30 days of surgery, overall surgical site infection, delayed healing (open wound for >30 days), time to wound epithelialization, and patient satisfaction were the primary outcomes measured. RESULTS: The pursestring group had a significantly lower stoma site infection rate (2% vs 15%, p = 0.01). There was no difference in delayed healing or patient satisfaction between groups. Time to epithelialization was measured in only 51 patients but was significantly longer in the pursestring group (34.6 ± 20 days vs 24.1 ± 17 days, p = 0.02). LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the variability in procedures and surgeons, the limited follow-up after 30 days, and the inability to perform blinding. CONCLUSION: Pursestring closure after stoma reversal has a lower risk of stoma site surgical site infection than conventional primary closure, although wounds may take longer to heal with the use of this approach. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01713452 (www.clinicaltrials.gov).


Subject(s)
Colostomy , Ileostomy , Intestinal Diseases/surgery , Surgical Stomas , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Wound Closure Techniques , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intestinal Diseases/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Wound Healing , Young Adult
3.
World J Surg ; 34(12): 2877-82, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20703459

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Stoma closure has been associated with a high rate of surgical site infection (SSI) and the ideal stoma-site skin closure technique is still debated. The aim of this study was to compare the rate of SSI following primary skin closure (PC) versus a skin-approximating, subcuticular purse-string closure (APS). METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing stoma closure between 2002 and 2007 by two surgeons at a single tertiary-care institution were retrospectively assessed. Patients who had a new stoma created at the same site or those without wound closure were excluded. The end point was SSI, determined according to current CDC guidelines, at the stoma closure site and/or the midline laparotomy incision. RESULTS: There were 61 patients in the PC group (surgeon A: 58 of 61) and 17 in the APS group (surgeon B: 16 of 17). The two groups were similar in baseline and intraoperative characteristics, except that patients in the PC group were more often diagnosed with benign disease (p = 0.0156) and more often had a stapled anastomosis (p = 0.002). The overall SSI rate was 14 of 78 (18%). All SSIs occurred in the PC group (14 of 61 vs. 0 of 17, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that a skin-approximating closure with a subcuticular purse-string of the stoma site leads to less SSI than a primary closure. Randomized studies are needed to confirm our findings and assess additional end points such as healing time, cost, and patient satisfaction.


Subject(s)
Dermatologic Surgical Procedures , Surgical Stomas , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Suture Techniques , Young Adult
4.
J Pediatr Surg ; 44(1): 257-65; discussion 265, 2009 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19159753

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: A variety of procedures have been described for the treatment of total colonic aganglionosis (TCA); however, there is no consensus as to a superior operative method. The objective of this review is to evaluate the operative methods used to treat TCA and their effectiveness with respect to morbidity, mortality, rates of enterocolitis, and functional outcomes. METHODS: We searched Medline (1950-2007) and the Cochrane Library for studies reporting the operative treatment of TCA. Search terms used were "aganglionosis," "Hirschsprung's disease," "total colonic," and "long-segment." Studies evaluated were limited to those that solely discussed the operative outcomes for the treatment of TCA. A meta-analysis was then performed for morbidity outcomes in those studies describing a single operative procedure. RESULTS: The search yielded 271 articles related to TCA. One hundred twenty-two articles discussed operative treatment of Hirschsprung's disease, and only 26 of these articles discussed operative management of TCA. Nineteen articles were isolated for statistical analysis on the basis of results for perioperative outcomes for a single procedure. These procedures included Martin (4), colonic patch modifications (4), Duhamel (2), endorectal pull-through (1), Kimura (2), Boley (2), Rehbein (2), Soave (1), and J-pouch ileoanal anastomosis (1). Overall mortality was 1.9%. Meta-analysis revealed morbidity rates ranging from 10% to 64% depending on procedure category without significant outliers. Higher morbidity rates were found for the Martin-type procedure using the descending colon but with noted higher within-group variance due to small sample sizes. Enterocolitis was noted in 7 studies with a mean of 22%. CONCLUSIONS: There is no superior operative method for the treatment of TCA with respect to perioperative morbidity, mortality, enterocolitis, and functional outcomes. The operative technique performed should be selected on center and surgeon familiarity and expertise.


Subject(s)
Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Hirschsprung Disease/surgery , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...