Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Reprod Domest Anim ; 40(6): 553-8, 2005 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16324083

ABSTRACT

In order to optimize the production of embryos under tropical conditions and to test a possible seasonal effect on embryo quality, 40 Zebu cows were superovulated during the dry season (April to May) and during the rainy season (July to August). A total of 116 (average 2.7/cow) and 83 embryos (3.5 average/cow) were obtained during the respective seasons. After classification as good, fair or poor quality, embryos were tested based on their ultrastructural differences (n = 53 dry season 16 good, 20 fair and 17 poor and n = 61 rainy season 21 good, 20 fair and 20 poor) and their degree of apoptosis using the TUNEL technique (n = 30 during the dry season and n = 55 in the rainy season). Structural characteristics determining embryo quality varied between good and fair quality embryos. No difference, however, was observed between good, fair and poor quality embryos from the two seasons. The number of TUNEL-positive cells was different among embryos (p < 0.001), being lower in labelled cells of good quality embryos regardless of the season. Fewer apoptotic cells were observed in embryos assigned in all three quality levels during the rainy season (p < 0.001). Ultrastructural evaluations confirmed the results obtained by TUNEL. Cryopreserved embryos of good (n = 25 in each season) and fair quality (n = 11 dry season; n = 17 rainy season) showed a significant decrease of TUNEL-positive cells during the rainy season (p < 0.05). Results suggest that embryos collected in the dry season have more cellular damage in contrast; embryos cryopreserved in the rainy season appeared morphologically better equipped to result in a pregnancy following transfer.


Subject(s)
Apoptosis/physiology , Cattle/embryology , Cryopreservation/veterinary , Embryo, Mammalian/physiology , Superovulation/physiology , Animals , Cattle/physiology , Cryopreservation/methods , Embryo, Mammalian/cytology , Embryo, Mammalian/ultrastructure , Female , In Situ Nick-End Labeling/veterinary , Pregnancy , Seasons
2.
Reprod Domest Anim ; 37(6): 341-6, 2002 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12464072

ABSTRACT

The most important point in embryo transfer success is the evaluation of the stage of development and quality of embryos. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the morphological evaluation of embryos using stereoscopy, light microscopy and electron microscopy in order to establish the accuracy of former method compared with more invasive and accurate procedures. For this purpose, 23 Brahman x Swiss cows were used and synchronized with Norgestomet 6 mg plus, 5 mg Estradiol valerate (Syncromate B(R), Rhone Merieux, Mexico, Mexico City) and superovulated with Folltropin-V 240 mg (Vetrepharm, Mexico, Mexico City). Non-surgical embryo collection was performed 7.5 days after insemination. Descriptive statistics analysis was used to assess the data. Seventy-eight embryos were collected and classified by stereoscopic microscopy, finding 51.2% (40) of good quality, 25.6% (20) fair and 24.3% (19) poor. Later, under light microscopy observation, evaluation of the same embryos resulted in 25.6% (20) good, 32.0% (25) fair and 42.3% poor quality. Finally, in the evaluation of embryos under electron microscopy 24.3% (19) were found to be of good quality, 29.3% (23) fair and 46.1% (36) poor. Evaluation of embryos with stereoscopic microscopy was found to be very subjective, as nearly 50% of embryos classified by this method as good quality, showed features of degenerative stages under light and electron microscopy. Embryos with these features are generally frozen and transferred, which could be one of the reasons for having low fertility rate in embryo transfer programmes.


Subject(s)
Cattle/embryology , Embryo Transfer/veterinary , Embryo, Mammalian/anatomy & histology , Animals , Breeding , Embryo Transfer/instrumentation , Embryo, Mammalian/ultrastructure , Female , Microscopy/veterinary , Pregnancy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...